Agonist Versus Classical HCG Trigger (Poor Responders, Normoresponders and High Responders)

December 8, 2017 updated by: Gorka Barrenetxea, Ginegorama S.L.

Agonist Trigger Versus Classical HCG Trigger in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among Three Different Subsets of Patients (Poor Responders, Normoresponders and High Responders)

Agonist triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols is being used during last years (among high responder patients to avoid OHSS).

Indeed, agonist triggering is more physiologic than HCG triggering. Investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of both types of trigger among three different subsets of patients:

  1. Poor responders.
  2. Normo-responders
  3. High responders Comparing both the number and the quality of achieved oocytes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

During the last years, ovulation triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols has been used specially to avoid hyperstimulation syndromes (OHSS). Indeed, the substitution of the classical HCG triggering by the agonist one, reduces almost to zero the risk of OHSS.

On the other hand poor responder patients to ovarian stimulation represent a challenge in assisted reproduction. Defining poor responders is not easy, but we can define them as those patients with less than 4 eggs obtained after oocyte retrieval.

Different strategies have been proposed to overcome this problem. In other words, to obtain more oocytes. These include an increase in FSH doses, an increase in FSH action by adding sensitizers agents.

Among the possible strategies, investigators propose the agonist triggering. HCG (classical) triggering represents the use of a LH-like product (with a prolonged action). The administration of a GnRH agonist provoke the production and liberation of both FSH and LH. Thus, the pro-ovulatory action is more physiologic , and possibly, more effective.

So, the use of a triggering protocol that nowadays is being used among high responders (thus reducing the OHSS risk) is proposed for both poor responder and normo-responder patients trying to achieve more oocytes, and specifically more mature oocytes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bizkaia
      • Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain, 48014
        • Reproduccion Bilbao Assisted Reproduction Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women scheduled for IVF treatment.
  • First ovarian stimulation
  • Two ovaries present
  • No previous ovarian surgery
  • No contraindication for any of the assigned treatments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous ovarian surgery.
  • Previous IVF treatments.
  • Absence of one ovary
  • Presence of an endometrioma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Poor responders. Classical trigger

Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval.

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with 4 or less antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • HCG trigger
Experimental: Poor responders. Agonist trigger

Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval)

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with 4 or less antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • Agonist trigger
Active Comparator: Normo responders. Classical trigger

Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval.

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 4 and less than 16 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • HCG trigger
Experimental: Normo responders. Agonist trigger

Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval)

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 4 and less than 16 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • Agonist trigger
Active Comparator: High responders. Classical trigger

Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval.

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 15 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • HCG trigger
Experimental: High responders. Agonist trigger

Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval)

Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 15 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment.

Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
  • Agonist trigger

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mature oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of mature oocytes achieved after oocyte retrieval.
Up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relation mature oocytes/punctured oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Relation between the number of mature oocytes and the follicles.
Up to 24 weeks
Fertilized oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of fertilized oocytes
Up to 24 weeks
Relation fertilized oocytes/achieved Mature oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Relation between the number of fertilized oocytes and the mature oocytes achieved.
Up to 24 weeks
Number of blastocysts developed
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of blastocysts developed in each arm of the study.
Up to 24 weeks
Cancelled cycles
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Percentage of cancelled cycles
Up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gorka Barrenetxea, PhD, Reproducción Bilbao. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
  • Study Chair: Jon Iker Arambarri, MD, Reproducción Bilbao. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility, Female

Clinical Trials on Human chorionic gonadotropin

3
Subscribe