- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03307720
Agonist Versus Classical HCG Trigger (Poor Responders, Normoresponders and High Responders)
Agonist Trigger Versus Classical HCG Trigger in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among Three Different Subsets of Patients (Poor Responders, Normoresponders and High Responders)
Agonist triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols is being used during last years (among high responder patients to avoid OHSS).
Indeed, agonist triggering is more physiologic than HCG triggering. Investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of both types of trigger among three different subsets of patients:
- Poor responders.
- Normo-responders
- High responders Comparing both the number and the quality of achieved oocytes.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
During the last years, ovulation triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation protocols has been used specially to avoid hyperstimulation syndromes (OHSS). Indeed, the substitution of the classical HCG triggering by the agonist one, reduces almost to zero the risk of OHSS.
On the other hand poor responder patients to ovarian stimulation represent a challenge in assisted reproduction. Defining poor responders is not easy, but we can define them as those patients with less than 4 eggs obtained after oocyte retrieval.
Different strategies have been proposed to overcome this problem. In other words, to obtain more oocytes. These include an increase in FSH doses, an increase in FSH action by adding sensitizers agents.
Among the possible strategies, investigators propose the agonist triggering. HCG (classical) triggering represents the use of a LH-like product (with a prolonged action). The administration of a GnRH agonist provoke the production and liberation of both FSH and LH. Thus, the pro-ovulatory action is more physiologic , and possibly, more effective.
So, the use of a triggering protocol that nowadays is being used among high responders (thus reducing the OHSS risk) is proposed for both poor responder and normo-responder patients trying to achieve more oocytes, and specifically more mature oocytes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bizkaia
-
Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain, 48014
- Reproduccion Bilbao Assisted Reproduction Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women scheduled for IVF treatment.
- First ovarian stimulation
- Two ovaries present
- No previous ovarian surgery
- No contraindication for any of the assigned treatments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous ovarian surgery.
- Previous IVF treatments.
- Absence of one ovary
- Presence of an endometrioma
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Poor responders. Classical trigger
Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval. Women scheduled for IVF treatment with 4 or less antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Poor responders. Agonist trigger
Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval) Women scheduled for IVF treatment with 4 or less antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Normo responders. Classical trigger
Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval. Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 4 and less than 16 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Normo responders. Agonist trigger
Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval) Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 4 and less than 16 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: High responders. Classical trigger
Intervention: HCG trigger (Administration of recombinant HCG 250 UI subcutaneously 36 prior to oocyte retrieval. Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 15 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 250 IU subcutaneously , 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: High responders. Agonist trigger
Intervention: Agonist trigger (administration of 0,2 mg of Triptoreline subcutaneously 36 hours prior to oocyte retrieval) Women scheduled for IVF treatment with more than 15 antral follicles in ultrasound assessment. |
Administration of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (0,2 ml) subcutaneously, 36 hours before ovum pick-up in IVF treatments.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mature oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Number of mature oocytes achieved after oocyte retrieval.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Relation mature oocytes/punctured oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Relation between the number of mature oocytes and the follicles.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Fertilized oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Number of fertilized oocytes
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Relation fertilized oocytes/achieved Mature oocytes
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Relation between the number of fertilized oocytes and the mature oocytes achieved.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Number of blastocysts developed
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Number of blastocysts developed in each arm of the study.
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Cancelled cycles
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
|
Percentage of cancelled cycles
|
Up to 24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gorka Barrenetxea, PhD, Reproducción Bilbao. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
- Study Chair: Jon Iker Arambarri, MD, Reproducción Bilbao. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AGONIST TRIGGER
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infertility, Female
-
Esraa Gamal AhmedAin Shams Maternity HospitalUnknownUnexplained Female Infertility
-
Pacific Fertility CenterTerminatedPrimary Female Infertility | Secondary Female Infertility
-
Assuta Hospital SystemsMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelCompletedInfertility, Female Infertility, Male InfertilityIsrael
-
Newlife Fertility CentreRecruitingInfertility | Infertility,Female | Infertility Unexplained | Infertility of Uterine Origin | Infertility; Female, NonimplantationCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Navy General Hospital, BeijingUnknownFemale Infertility Due to Nonimplantation of OvumChina
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedPregnancy | Male Infertility | Female InfertilityNetherlands
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesWithdrawnUterine Diseases | Endometriosis | Infertility Unexplained | Endometrial Diseases | Infertility; Female, NonimplantationUnited States
-
Sapientiae InstituteTerminated
-
Woman's Health University Hospital, EgyptCompletedFemale Infertility Due to Diminished Ovarian ReserveEgypt
Clinical Trials on Human chorionic gonadotropin
-
Beijing Children's HospitalUnknownKallmann Syndrome | Hypogonadotropic HypogonadismChina
-
Ferring PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Royan InstituteCompletedEndocrine System Diseases | Gonadal DisordersIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Michigan State UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedRepeated Implantation FailureEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityAdam International Hospital; Nile Ivf Center, Cairo, EgyptCompleted
-
Tongji HospitalRecruitingInfertility | Kallmann Syndrome | Isolated Hypogonadotropic HypogonadismChina
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromeUnited States
-
ART Fertility Clinics LLCCompleted
-
Martin Blomberg JensenCompleted