Relationship Between Aerobic Prescription Methods
January 17, 2016 updated by: Alberto Souza de Sá Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Relationship Between Methods of Aerobic Prescription: Heart Rate vs. VO2 Load vs. Self Selected
Current literature report 3 ways to prescribe and control aerobic training.
Such models require comparison to determine if they really provide the same impact training in a prescription.
The aim of this study is to compare the results of different methods of prescription of aerobic training, ie VO2 workload, heart rate (HR), and load self adjusted by perceived effort (PSE) as well as psychological responses activation, and feel depending on the stimuli offered.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
36 subjects will undergo two sessions.
On the first visit, a maximum aerobic exercise test will be carried on treadmill to determine the maximum oxygen intake and maximum heart rate.
Second, the subjects are placed (in a blinded fashion) in 3 situations of moderate effort (60 to 65%) for a total of 5 min and 3 min interval between conditions.
In situation 1) will be used to speed regarding the particular metabolic demand from the maximum oxygen intake; In the second situation the reserve of heart rate will be used as reference for prescription aiming to achieve 60-65%; On the last visit will be shown to subjects a perceived effort characterized as moderate and asked to adjust their speed according to the application effort.
The final will be recorded each time the FC and the speed and perception of effort that the subject was.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
36
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 45 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 at 45 years
- Risk stratification low
- Physically active by American College of Sports Medicine criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of ergogenic resources
- Use of sympatholytic drugs
- Use of stimulants
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Prescription for Workload
Prescription from 65% VO2max for 5 min of exercise
|
Prescription from 60 - 65% Maximum Heart Rate for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
Prescription Self Selected from Perceived exertion at 3 - 4 (moderate) for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Prescription for Heart Rate
Prescription from 60 - 65% Maximum Heart Rate for 5 min of exercise
|
Prescription Self Selected from Perceived exertion at 3 - 4 (moderate) for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
Prescription from 65% VO2max for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Prescription Self Selected
Prescription Self Selected from Perceived exertion at 3 - 4 (moderate) for 5 min of exercise
|
Prescription from 60 - 65% Maximum Heart Rate for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
Prescription from 65% VO2max for 5 min of exercise
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Response of Heart Rate and perceived Effort through prescriptions for oxygen uptake
Time Frame: Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
|
Response of Heart Rate through prescriptions for self selected workload based in perceived effort
Time Frame: Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
|
Response of velocity and Perceived Effort through Prescription of Heart Rate
Time Frame: Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
Acute Change in 5 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
April 1, 2016
Study Completion (Anticipated)
July 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
January 21, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 21, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2016
Last Verified
January 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNIG 02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.