Comparison of Disposcope Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope

September 23, 2017 updated by: The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao

A Comparison of Disposcope Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope During Awake Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airway : A Prospective, Randomised and Controlled Clinical Trial

The fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) has been the preferred instrument for many years in the management of difficult tracheal intubation, and it is considered as a gold standard. The disposcope endoscope (DE) is a medical device for endotracheal intubation used in clinical practice recently.This study compares FOB and DE for awake orotracheal intubation in obese patients with anticipated difficult airway.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Forty obese patients with anticipated difficult airways were randomised to undergo awake orotracheal intubation by FOB(group F) or DE(group D) after conscious sedation. The conditions of orotracheal intubation, the time needed to view the vocal cords and to complete the orotracheal intubation, the hemodynamic changes and the adverse events including bradycardia, respiratory depression during orotracheal intubation, throat pain, hoarseness and memory after surgery were recorded. The ease of view the vocal cords and passing the tracheal tube through the glottis were also evaluated by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) by operator.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classifications of I-II, modified Mallampati classification of 3 or 4, requiring general anesthesia were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 yr,
  • ASA class IV or V,
  • Abnormalities of the heart, brain, liver, lung, kidney and coagulation functions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fiberoptic bronchoscope
In case of FOB, the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB
In case of FOB, the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB
Experimental: Disposcope endoscope
In the DE group, the operator gripped the chin and lower incisors of patients with the fingers and thumb to open the mouth adequately wide and grasped the wire body, which was enclosed within the endotracheal tube, by the other hand and held it parallel to,then inserted into oral cavity
In the DE group, the operator gripped the chin and lower incisors of patients with the fingers and thumb to open the mouth adequately wide and grasped the wire body, which was enclosed within the endotracheal tube, by the other hand and held it parallel to,then inserted into oral cavity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intubation Time
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Occurrence of throat pain measured by VAS
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ximing Qi, PHD, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0001 (Cancer Research Institute)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Therapeutic Procedural Complication

Clinical Trials on Fiberoptic bronchoscope

3
Subscribe