Treatment for Malignant Ovarian Cancer: Laparoscopy vs Laparotomy

February 18, 2016 updated by: Qing Yang, Shengjing Hospital

Diagnosis and Treatment of Laparoscopy for Malignant Ovarian Cancer: an Open-label, Parallel, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety

This trial is designed to compare diagnostic and therapeutic effects of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy on early malignant ovarian cancer, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy in early malignant ovarian cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The principle for treating early-stage ovarian cancer is first to stage the cancer, and then to determine the optimal surgical and non-surgical treatments. Ovarian cancers mainly metastasize as extensive diffusions on surfaces of organs in the abdominal cavity. Although the most common ovarian cancer staging method is laparotomy, this procedure often misses upper abdominal metastases, especially on the diaphragm muscles, thus leading to inaccurate staging and prognostic assessments, and insufficient treatment.

A laparoscopic approach allows closer observation of relevant tissues, as these tissues are magnified in laparoscopies, which facilitates discovery of small lesions on surfaces of diaphragmatic muscle, liver and stomach fundus. Laparoscopes allow lavage of a wider area of the abdominal cavity, including hepatic flexure, splenic flexure and diaphragmatic muscle; and can also improve the accuracy of peritoneal lavage examinations while avoiding blood contamination. Laparoscopic surgery is also a very accurate staging procedure, with potentially reduced complications, bleeding, hospitalization days and expense, and recovery time compared with laparotomy-thus shortening the interval between surgery and initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

However, although some studies have compared laparoscopy and laparotomy for ovarian cancer, most are individual or small-sample case report or case-control studies. A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is needed.

This will be a prospective, open, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial, designed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy and laparotomy in diagnosing and treating early malignant ovarian cancer in terms of surgical safety, postoperative survival rate, reoperation rate, postoperative quality of life and medical cost, to provide evidence for clinical application of laparoscopic surgical staging in in diagnosing and treating early malignant ovarian cancer, and to fill some gaps in the evidence for laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Endoscopic surgical staging of early malignant ovarian cancer accords with the trend of minimal invasion and radical treatment for tumors.

Surgical procedures Laparoscopy: (1) Pneumoperitoneum will be established for laparoscopy. Ascites or pelvic peritoneal lavage fluid will be used for cytologic examination. (2) Unilateral or bilateral attachments will be resected, placed in specimen bags, and removed, to be pathologically examined as fast-frozen samples. Alternatively, the ovarian artery and vein will be ligated, and attachments on the lesion side will be resected and placed in the specimen bag, which will be tied and placed at right iliac fossa. (3) The uterus will be resected and removed through the vagina with the specimen bag at the right iliac fossa. (4) Pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes will be resected and separately removed through the vagina. (5) The greater omentum below the transverse colon will be resected and, together with parietal peritoneum at the paracolic sulci and basin side, receive multiple punch biopsies. (6) Removal of vermiform appendix; closure of vaginal stump by vaginal suture and laparoscopic suspension; (7) wound hemostasis, irrigation, and drainage.

Laparotomy: Hysterectomy + oophorotomy + high ligation of ovarian artery and vein + dissection of pelvic and abdominal aortic lymph nodes + resection of greater omentum + resection of vermiform appendix. Procedures are the same as with the laparoscopy group.

Withdrawal process Criteria for withdrawal during the trial Patients may withdraw from the trial (1) if the researchers consider withdrawal to be medically necessary, (2) if patients ask to withdraw, or (3) if patients who have no fixed means of contact plan to move to other cities during follow-up.

Withdrawal of consent during follow-up If patients or their families do not agree to do further tests during follow-up, we will not conduct further evaluation. The corresponding data will not be collected, although data previously collected will be retained, and can be used for analysis with informed consent.

Data archiving, collection and monitoring Paper-based case report forms will be archived, and their data will be converted to an electronic version by professionals using a double-data entry strategy.

To ensure the safety of the patient and the integrity of the clinical data, correct informed consent procedures and assessment of primary end points and compliance will be monitored by professional inspectors. Inspectors have the right to query key documents. Besides site visits, inspectors and the test center will keep in touch through email and phone.

Security of patients' data Each patient will be encoded separately during the trial. Case report forms will be saved in accordance with local data protection laws. These data will be strictly confidential. During clinical interviews, clinical research associates will examine patient-related data to ensure its correctness and completeness, and its preservation in accord with legal requirements.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions(SPSS) 18.0 software, with normally distributed variables expressed as mean ± standard deviation; abnormally distributed variables as median and interquartile range; and categorical variables expressed as number and percentage. Continuous variables will be compared among groups using Student's t-test. Abnormally distributed data will be compared among groups using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be compared among groups using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be performed for the different time point assessments between groups. P < 0.05 will be considered significant.

Contact and communication Our communication strategy mainly involves patients enrolled in trials, who can consult with doctors, family members or friends to decide whether to participate in the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative examination indicates highly suspected early stage of ovarian cancer.
  • This is the first time treatment to the patient for the ovarian cancer.
  • Family consents are granted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding women
  • History of multiple pelvic surgeries; severe adhesions suspected at the surgical area
  • Highly allergic constitution or a history of severe allergies
  • Systemic infection or severe local infection
  • Age younger than 18 years old or older than 65 years old
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease, liver and kidney dysfunction and other severe underlying disease
  • Poor compliance (cannot finish the trial) or the investigator believes that the patient is not appropriate for treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the laparoscopy group
Patients who are randomized to the laparoscopy group.
Procedure: Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy is an operation performed in the abdomen or pelvis through small incisions (usually 0.5-1.5 cm) with the aid of a camera. It can either be used to inspect and diagnose a condition or to perform surgery.
Experimental: the laparotomy group
Patients who are randomized to the laparotomy group.
Procedure: Laparotomy
A laparotomy is a surgical procedure involving a large incision through the abdominal wall to gain access into the abdominal cavity. It is also known as a celiotomy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Time to recurrence
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Time to last follow up/death
5 years
Operative complication rate
Time Frame: 30 days
Intra- and post-operative complication rate of both group
30 days
Quality of life after surgery
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Quality of life before surgery, and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after surgery in both groups will be evaluated using European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Shengjing Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qing Yang, M.D., Shengjing Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QYang_001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Senegal

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe