Volatile Anesthetic Protection Of Renal Transplants 2 (VAPOR-2)

July 24, 2025 updated by: Gertrude J. Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen
To compare the effect of a sevoflurane based anesthesia versus a propofol based anesthesia on the incidence of DGF in recipients of kidneys of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) donors

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective:

To compare the effect of a sevoflurane based anaesthesia versus a propofol based anaesthesia on the incidence of delayed graft function in recipients of DCD and DBD donor kidneys.

Study design:

Prospective randomized controlled European multicentre clinical trial with two parallel groups

Study population:

Patients ≥18 years scheduled for kidney transplantation with a kidney from a DBD or DCD donor

Intervention:

Patients will be included and randomised to one of the following groups:

Group 1 PROP (control): Propofol: a propofol-remifentanil based anaesthesia. Group 2 SEVO (intervention): Sevoflurane: a sevoflurane-remifentanil based anaesthesia.

Main study parameters:

Primary outcome: The two co-primary endpoints are the incidence of DGF and one-year acute rejection in recipients of DCD and DBD donor kidneys. DGF is defined as need for dialysis within the first week after transplantation, excluding one-time dialysis for hyperkalaemia. Acute rejection is defined by the modified BANFF 2013 classification and must be associated with decline in kidney function and treatment.

Secondary outcomes Functional delayed graft function (fDGF) is defined as the absence of a daily decrease of at least 10% in serum creatinine for at least three consecutive days; primary non function (PNF) defined as a permanent lack of function of the allograft; length of hospital stay and postoperative complications of all kind (28). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at one week and three and twelve months calculated with the CKD-EPI formula; measured GFR employing Iodinethalamate (Groningen), CrEDTA (Aarhus) and Iohexol (Oslo) at twelve months; readmissions at three and twelve months, graft survival and patient survival at twelve months.;

The investigators predefined four substudies being: Cardiac biomarkers in renal transplantation, Volatile vs Intravenous anaesthetic agent; Predictive value of urinary Biomarkers in a deceased donor kidney transplantation cohort to predict PNF, DGF, Acute rejection and long term graft function and outcome; Association between intraoperative haemodynamics and vasopressor use and graft outcome; Postoperative delirium, volatile vs Intravenous anaesthetic agent (Groningen, Aarhus);

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

488

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Amsterdam University Medical Center
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9728XR
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Oslo, Norway
        • university Hospital Oslo
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Fundagio Puigvert

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • high immunological risk as determined bij local practice
  • Patients of the ABO-incompatible program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: propofol
Group 1 PROP (control): propofol: a propofol-remifentanil based general anesthesia.
General anesthesia with propofol
Active Comparator: sevoflurane
Group 2 SEVO (intervention): Sevoflurane: a sevoflurane-remifentanil based general anesthesia.
General anesthesia with sevoflurane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of delayed graft function and/or one year acute rejection
Time Frame: DGF: 7 days after transplantation Acute rejection: up to 1 year after transplantation
DGF is defined as need of dialysis first 7 days after transplantation Acute rejection up to 1 year after transplantation, defined by the modified BANFF 2013 classification and must be associated with decline in kidney function and treatment.
DGF: 7 days after transplantation Acute rejection: up to 1 year after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Time Frame: 7 days after transplantation, 3 months after transplantation, 1 year after transplantation
calculated with the CKD-EPI formula
7 days after transplantation, 3 months after transplantation, 1 year after transplantation
incidence of primary non function (PNF)
Time Frame: up to 3 months after transplantation
PNF is defined as permanent lack of function of the transplanted kidney. This kidney will not gain function after transplantation
up to 3 months after transplantation
Incidence of funactional Delayed Graft Function
Time Frame: 7 days after transplantation
Absence of a daily decrease of at least 10% in serum creatinine for at least three consecutive days
7 days after transplantation
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From day of transplantation until the day of discharge, assessed up to 60 days
Days
From day of transplantation until the day of discharge, assessed up to 60 days
Postoperative complications of all kind
Time Frame: from the day of transplantation until the day of discharge, assessed up to 60 days
from the day of transplantation until the day of discharge, assessed up to 60 days
hospital readmissions after transplantation
Time Frame: 3 months after transplantation and between 3 months and 1year after transplantation
3 months after transplantation and between 3 months and 1year after transplantation
Graft survival
Time Frame: up to 1 year after transplantation
up to 1 year after transplantation
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: up to 1 year after transplantation
Mortality due to any cause
up to 1 year after transplantation
measured GFR employing Iodinethalamate (Groningen), CrEDTA (Aarhus) and Iohexol (Oslo) at twelve months
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
In a subpopulation of Groningen, Aarhus, Oslo; employing Iodinethalamate (Groningen), CrEDTA (Aarhus) and Iohexol (Oslo)
1 year after transplantation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac biomarkers in renal transplantation, Volatile vs Intravenous anesthetic agent. A substudy of the VAPOR-2 study; a multicenter randomized controlled study
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 year follow-up
The aim of our study is to investigate cardiac biomarkers in kidney transplant recipients using two different anesthesia regimen and to investigate whether there is any difference in outcome. In this substudy we will investigate the levels and thresholds of cardiac biomarkers (Troponin-T and pro-BNP) at three time points (day 0, day 1 and day3) with two different anesthetic management (intravenous or inhalational), and the impact of outcome and MACE (major adverse cardiac events). The findings in this study may provide important information for the transplant team about which anesthesia is best suited for kidney transplant recipients with cardiovascular comorbidity.
From enrollment to 1 year follow-up
Predictive value of urinary Biomarkers in a deceased donor kidney transplantation cohort to predict PNF, DGF, Acute rejection and long term graft function and outcome
Time Frame: from enrollement to follow-up of 1 year
The donation and transplantation procedure is inevitably accompanied by harmful processes that impact the kidney's viability. Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is one of the main harmful processes which frequently results in complications and reduced kidney function after transplantation, such as delayed graft function (DGF) or primary non-function (PNF) . It is therefore important to detect and prevent damage as a result of IRI. An improved and earlier detection of IRI-induced damage might allow therapeutic measures and improve renal function and patient outcome on a longer term. We studied several biomarkers in a living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) cohort. We will now proceed whit analysis of the release pattern and predictive value of KIM-1, H-FABP, NAG and NGAL and novel biomarkers on short- and long-term graft outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation
from enrollement to follow-up of 1 year
Association between intraoperative haemodynamics and graft outcome
Time Frame: from enrollement to 1 year follow-up
Perioperative hemodynamic and fluid management remains one of the most debated topics in modern anesthesia, particularly in the context of kidney transplantation, where there is currently no consensus on optimal blood pressure targets. This is further complicated by the fact that the transplanted kidney is denervated, resulting in impaired autoregulation and making renal blood flow directly dependent on systemic circulation. Our objective is to identify specific intraoperative hemodynamic parameters that are associated with both short- and long-term graft outcomes. To achieve this, we will analyze continuous intraoperative hemodynamic data and assess their relationship with delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), primary non-function (PNF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 and 12 months, and overall graft survival.
from enrollement to 1 year follow-up
Incidence of postoperative delirium assessed by RASS in PACU and CAM on postoperative days 1-2 between volatile vs Intravenous anaesthetic agent, A substudy of the VAPOR-2 study
Time Frame: From day of transplantation until 2 days postoperative

This substudy investigates the incidence of postoperative delirium after renal transplantation in a randomized controlled trial with two groups anesthetized using either Propofol or Sevoflurane. Postoperative delirium will be screened using RASS (Richmond agitation sedation score) in the PACU and CAM (Confusion assessment method) during the first two postoperative days on the ward.

The findings from this study will provide information about the incidence of postoperative delirium following renal transplantation. Data may provide information about differences depending on the choice of anesthetic agent - Propofol versus Sevoflurane.

From day of transplantation until 2 days postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke, MD, University Medical Center Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon completion of the study and primary data analysis, the dataset will be anonymized and made openly accessible through a public data repository

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Study Protocol, ICF and SAP will be shared with the protocol article which will be publihed open access Upon completion of the study and primary data analysis, the dataset will be anonymized and made openly accessible through a public data repository (start date January 2027-end date to be determined)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

all will be open access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on propofol

Subscribe