SecOnd-generation seLf-expandable Versus Balloon-expandable Valves and gEneral Versus Local Anesthesia in TAVI (SOLVE-TAVI)

February 17, 2021 updated by: Holger Thiele, MD, Leipzig Heart Institute GmbH

CompariSon of secOnd-generation seLf-expandable Versus Balloon-expandable Valves and gEneral Versus Local Anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (SOLVE-TAVI)

Aim of the study is to demonstrate equivalence of second-generation self-expandable valves (CoreValve Evolut R) in comparison to second-generation balloon-expandable valves (Edwards Sapien 3) and of local anesthesia with conscious sedation in comparison to general anesthesia with respect to safety and efficacy in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

444

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Luebeck, Germany, 23538
        • University of Luebeck

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis defined as aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1cm2 or 0.6 cm²/m²
  • Age ≥75 years and/or logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) ≥20% and/or Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score ≥10% and/or high risk/contraindication to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement
  • Native aortic valve annulus measuring 18-29 mm
  • Suitability for transfemoral vascular access
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy <12 months due to comorbidities
  • Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
  • History of or active endocarditis
  • Contraindications for transfemoral access
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding <3 months
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin or clopidogrel
  • Contraindication for a specific mode of anesthesia as judged by the cardiac anesthesia representative of the Heart Team
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic treatment
  • Participation in another trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Self-expandable valve under local anesthesia
CoreValve Evolut R valve under local anesthesia with conscious sedation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Self-expandable valve under general anesthesia
CoreValve Evolut R valve under general anesthesia
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Balloon-expandable valve under local anesthesia
Edwards Sapien 3 valve under local anesthesia with conscious sedation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Balloon-expandable valve under general anesthesia
Edwards Sapien 3 valve under under general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Device)
Time Frame: 30 day follow-up
Number of participants with adverse events related to the treatment at 30-day follow-up consisting of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and permanent pacemaker implantation
30 day follow-up
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Anesthesia)
Time Frame: 30 day follow-up
Number of participants with adverse events related to the treatment at 30-day follow-up consisting of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, infection requiring antibiotic treatment, and acute kidney injury
30 day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on General anesthesia

Subscribe