Reducing Blood Culture Contamination:

May 2, 2016 updated by: Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Reducing Blood Culture Contamination: a Prospective Crossover Study

Bloodstream infections cause significant morbidity and mortality and their prompt identification is an essential part of modern medicine. False positive results in blood cultures are primarily due to contaminants. It has been estimated that up to 50% of positive blood cultures represent contamination. These false positive cultures, at the microbiological laboratory level, require significant additional resources for workup. Additionally, they result in unnecessary antibiotic treatment and hospitalization days, causing needless harm to patients. Various methods have been implemented in order to reduce blood culture contaminants, including modifying the solution used for sterilizing the skin and feedback on contamination rates. However, it has been shown that the bacteria which colonize the human skin are not only on the surface but in fact colonize deeper surfaces as well. The SteriPath device diverts the initial 1-2 ml blood so as to remove any potential skin plug with contaminants. Thus, the principle object of this study is the determination of the rate of contamination of blood culture taken prior to initiating intervention versus the rate of contamination using three interventions: Monthly feedback via departmental report card, a chlorhexidine plus alcohol wipe and the SteriPath device. Secondary objectives will include ease of use of the wipes and the SteriPath device and an estimate of the sensitivity of SteriPath device use to true bacteremia. If the various interventions will be shown to reduce contamination, researchers will also attempt to estimate the financial effects of those reductions, comparing intervention cost to estimated savings related to reduced contamination.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients hospitalized in our institution in whom blood cultures are taken

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Monthly report
A monthly report will be submitted to department heads describing their departments rate of blood culture contamination and comparing it to blood culture contamination rate in previous months and to blood culture contamination rate of the hospital as a whole
Experimental: Steripath
The Steripath device (Magnolia) will be used to take blood cultures in this arm instead of standard methods. This will be in addition to a departmental monthly report (described above).
A device that diverts the first 2 ml of blood drawn in order to reduce contamination
Experimental: Soluprep wipes
In this arm, skin sterilization will be achieved using Soluprep wipes (3M) instead of standard methods (alcohol wipes).This will be in addition to a departmental monthly report (described above).
Wipes containing alcohol (70%) and chlorhexidine (2%) to achieve skin sterilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of contaminated blood cultures relative to overall blood cultures as compared to percentage in historical and parallel control groups
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Ease of use of SteriPath device as evaluated by resident physicians and phlebotomists using a questionaire
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Cost effectiveness of Steripath device and chlorhexidine wipes in measured as cost of devices in dollars versus reduction of cost in dollars associated with reduced blood culture contamination
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 42/16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preventing Blood Culture Contamination

3
Subscribe