Closed Suction Drainage in Shoulder Arthroplasty

March 25, 2019 updated by: Christopher S. Ahmad, MD, Columbia University

The Utility of Closed Suction Drainage in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Analysis.

The purpose of this study is to determine the limited effectiveness of drains during Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Drains are used during joint arthroplasty procedures to decrease infection rates, swelling,and the number of dressing changes required during a hospital stay. The use of drains has been heavily investigated in the hip and knee replacement literature, but there have been no investigations regarding their use in shoulder replacements, despite frequent use.

Clinical benefit has not been consistently documented regarding drain usage in hip and knee arthroplasty and the investigators hypothesize that they are of limited utility in total shoulder arthroplasty as well. The investigators will perform a prospective investigation of total shoulder arthroplasty patients- dividing them into two groups- half will receive a drain at the time of surgery and the other half will not be receiving a drain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The use of closed-suction draining has been well studied in the hip and knee arthroplasty literature. Drains have been used with the intention of decreasing infection, ecchymoses, and frequency of dressing changes. Some have reported a corresponding decrease in hematocrit for patients receiving post-op drainage leading to increased transfusion needs. Given that no clinical benefit has been consistently documented regarding drain usage in knee and hip arthroplasty, they are no longer routinely used in those operations. The use of such drainage systems in shoulder arthroplasty, however, has not been studied and the benefit of drain use in regards to patient outcomes is questionable. As such, the study is a prospective investigation comparing outcomes in two groups of total shoulder arthroplasty patients, those receiving a drain at the time of surgery and those without a drain. The short-term outcome measurements include peri-operative hematocrit and hemoglobin, infection rate, hematoma development, transfusion requirement, ecchymosis and wound complication. Long-term outcomes include shoulder functional scores as measured by post-operative visits and any need for revision shoulder surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty following trauma, failed prior surgery/revision or infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TSA with drain placement
Hemovac drains are placed in subjects during standard Total Shoulder Arthroplasty involving the replacement of damaged shoulder components with shoulder prosthesis.
Experimental portion removing/draining blood/fluid from a space created during a surgical procedure. Typically, surgeons place a plastic tube in the shoulder joint to drain fluids that may accumulate after surgery. Hemovac drain is a FDA-approved device routinely used or wound drainage; however, there is no known evidence whether this improves outcomes of surgery.
Standard procedure for treating the severe pain and stiffness that often result at the end stage of various forms of arthritis or degenerative joint disease of the shoulder joint. The primary goal of shoulder replacement surgery is pain relief, with a secondary benefit of restoring motion, strength, function, and assisting with returning patients to an activity level as near to normal as possible. Shoulder prosthesis is a standard artificial device to replace both components of the "ball and socket" joint during TSA.
Other Names:
  • TSA
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TSA without drain placement
Hemovac drains will not be placed in subjects during standard Total Shoulder Arthroplasty involving the replacement of damaged shoulder components with shoulder prosthesis.
Standard procedure for treating the severe pain and stiffness that often result at the end stage of various forms of arthritis or degenerative joint disease of the shoulder joint. The primary goal of shoulder replacement surgery is pain relief, with a secondary benefit of restoring motion, strength, function, and assisting with returning patients to an activity level as near to normal as possible. Shoulder prosthesis is a standard artificial device to replace both components of the "ball and socket" joint during TSA.
Other Names:
  • TSA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hemoglobin level
Time Frame: Day 0 post-operative, day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative
To assess blood loss
Day 0 post-operative, day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative
Change in Hematocrit level
Time Frame: Day 0 post-operative, day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative
To assess blood loss
Day 0 post-operative, day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Day 0 post-operative to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Calculated in number of days
Day 0 post-operative to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Total cost incurred during hospital stay
Time Frame: Pre-surgical admitting to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Calculation will include the cost of the surgical procedure
Pre-surgical admitting to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Change in Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative
To determine the longterm effect of drain usage on functional shoulder score-total score from 0-100 where 0= worse pain and functional loss /disability
Baseline, 6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative
Number of subjects that developed any of the following: wound compromise, ecchymosis, bleeding, hematoma formation or infection
Time Frame: Day 0 post-operative to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Day 0 post-operative to discharge, an average of up to 3 days
Total Drain Output record
Time Frame: Day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative
Calculated total blood loss in ml
Day 1 post-operative, day 2 post-operative
Number of subjects that presented with anatomic healing after total shoulder arthroplasty
Time Frame: 6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative
To be determined by shoulder ultrasound results
6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative
Change in Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative
To determine the longterm effect of drain usage on functional shoulder score- measured from 0-100 a higher score indicates greater disability
Baseline, 6 month post-operative, 1 year post-operative, 2 year post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher S. Ahmad, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 24, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Wound drainage

Subscribe