PPARγ Agonist Treatment for Cocaine Dependence

March 26, 2018 updated by: Joy Schmitz, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether a medication called pioglitazone (trade name Actos) can reduce behavioral problems associated with cocaine use, improve brain structural changes associated with cocaine use and reduce cocaine craving and drug use in cocaine dependent patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-IV criteria for cocaine dependence
  • At least one cocaine positive urine during screening
  • Female subjects: a negative pregnancy test
  • Be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam
  • Be able to understand the consent form and provide written informed consent
  • Be able to provide the names of at least 2 persons who can generally locate their whereabouts.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV diagnosis of any psychoactive substance dependence other than cocaine marijuana, alcohol, or nicotine
  • Any serious medical or psychiatric illness and/or clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, which in the judgment of the Principal Investigator or his/her designee would make study participation unsafe, or would make treatment compliance difficult or put the study staff at undue risk
  • Significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation
  • Medical conditions contraindicating pioglitazone pharmacotherapy (e.g., congestive heart failure as determined by Framingham criteria, clinically significant edema, clinically significant liver disease, hypoglycemia, diabetes, history of bladder cancer)
  • Taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with the study medication (CYP2C8 inhibitors or inducers, antihyperglycemic medications)
  • Currently being treated for substance misuse with medication
  • Conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court
  • Impending incarceration
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial or nursing for female patients
  • Inability to read, write, or speak English (many of the research instruments in this study only exist in English)
  • Having plans to leave the immediate geographical area within 3 months
  • Unwillingness to sign a written informed consent form
  • Unwillingness to use a barrier method of birth control during the study for female patients
  • History of pacemaker or metal implants or welding or metal work without protective eyewear (for risk of MRI scans).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pioglitazone + Therapy + Contingency Management
Subjects randomized to pioglitazone begin with a starting dose of 15 mg daily administered. The dose will be titrated up to 30mg on the second week and 45 mg on the third week of the study. Subjects will remain on 45 mg of pioglitazone until the end of week 12. At the end of week 12 the study medication will be discontinued.
Subjects randomized to pioglitazone begin with a starting dose of 15 mg daily administered. The dose will be titrated up to 30mg on the second week and 45 mg on the third week of the study. Subjects will remain on 45 mg of pioglitazone until the end of week 12. At the end of week 12 the study medication will be discontinued.
Other Names:
  • Actos
Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1 hour per week
Prize-based contingency management for attendance
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Therapy + Contingency Management
Subjects randomized to placebo receive placebo capsules once daily across all twelve weeks of the study.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1 hour per week
Prize-based contingency management for attendance
Subjects randomized to placebo receive placebo capsules once daily across all twelve weeks of the study.
Other Names:
  • corn starch

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Craving as Assessed by the Brief Substance Craving Scale (BSCS)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12
The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.)
Baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12
Craving as Assessed by the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS)
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The obsessive compulsive drug use scale (OCDUS) measures the level of craving for cocaine during the past week. The mean score over all time points is reported in this outcome measure (i.e., a summary score is reported). The scale was administered once weekly. It consists of 12 items. The score range is 0 to 60, and higher scores indicates greater craving.
Weeks 1-12
Cue Reactivity as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Cocaine Craving
Time Frame: Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12
Every two weeks, visual analog scale ratings of craving (VAS craving) consisting of 100 mm line, anchored by 0 "not at all" and 100 "extremely," were used to assess cocaine craving right now, craving on average in the past week, and the worst craving in the past week. Data were analyzed as a total score, which is the sum of the scores for the three questions.
Baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Posterior Thalamic Radiation)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Anterior Thalamic Radiation)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Splenium of Corpus Callosum)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Genu of Corpus Callosum)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - External Capsule)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12
Brain White Matter (WM) Integrity as Assessed by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Value (Region - Cingulum)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
DTI scans were acquired on a Philips Integra 3T magnet. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a summary measure of the integrity of white matter neurons that provides a dimensionless index of the expected movement of water molecules inside and across the neuron. Higher values of FA indicate better neuronal integrity (that is, less movement of water across the neuron). There is no range of values, as this is a dimensionless index.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Subject Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed All 12 Weeks of the Study
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Riboflavin-Positive
Time Frame: weeks 1 - 12
Riboflavin was added to pill capsules as a marker of medication compliance. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.
weeks 1 - 12
Feasibility - Medication Compliance as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Capsules Were Taken
Time Frame: weeks 1 - 12
A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used for self-reports. The percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.
weeks 1 - 12
Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants Reporting Side Effects
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
Feasibility - Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Urine Samples That Were Cocaine-positive
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Urine samples were collected once weekly.
Weeks 1-12
Cocaine Use as Assessed by Percentage of Self-reports That Indicate Cocaine Use
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
A modified Timeline Followback (TLFB) procedure was used to assess cocaine use. The mean percentage over all time points is reported in this outcome measure. Self-reports were collected once weekly.
Weeks 1-12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joy M Schmitz, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Pioglitazone

Subscribe