- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02817880
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation and the Trans-spinal Stimulation in the Algoneurodystrophy. (ALGOSTIM)
May 17, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation (tDCS and rTMS) and the Trans-spinal Stimulation (tsDCS ) in the Algoneurodystrophy of Members. A Randomised Clinical Trial. tDCS : Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation rTMS : Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation tsDCS : Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic effectiveness of two motor cortex neurostimulations (tDCS and rTMS) and the trans-spinal neurostimulation (tsDCS ) in the algoneurodystrophy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Entry into the study : After informed consent, patients will be randomised into three groups : tDCS, rTMS, tsDCS. The physician responsible for conducting neurostimulation sessions will make the randomization via an interactive web response system (IWRS).
- Baseline : Participants, will record on a book, a daily Visual Numeric Scale(VNS) of Pain Intensity for 1 month.
- The beginning of the treatment : after the baseline, sessions of neurostimulation will begin. Sessions of neurostimulation will have a decreasing rhythm. Five sessions per week during the two first weeks, two sessions per week during the third week, one session during the fourth week and then two sessions per month for four months.
- After the end of neurostimulation sessions, patients will be followed for 1month.
Throughout their participation in the study, patients will complete their VNS report book (1month of baseline before the treatment, 3 months during neurostimulation, 1 month after neurostimulation).
Patients will have 5 evaluation examinations:
- The first, one just before the beginning of the neurostimulation,
- The second, 1 month after the beginning of neurostimulation
- The third, 3 months after the beginning of neurostimulation
- And the last one, 1 month after the end of neurostimulation.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
36
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ile De France
-
Créteil, Ile De France, France, 94010
- Service de Physiologie - Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Henri Mondor
-
-
Isere
-
Grenoble, Isere, France, 38043
- Centre de la douleur, CHU Grenoble Alpes
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient's written consent
- Patient suffering from an algoneurodystrophy for more than a year.
- Diagnosis of algoneurodystrophy confirmed by an osseous scintigraphy
- Stable treatment for at least 1 month
- Patient non-responsive to pharmacological treatments
- VNS > 3 at the time of screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- Drug addiction
- History of epilepsy, head trauma, Psychiatric pathology likely to hamper the progress of the study.
- Intracranial ferromagnetic material or an implanted stimulator
- MRI contraindication
- Algoneurodystrophy due to a nervous lesion
- Pregnant women, parturient women, breast-feeding mother. Lack of effective contraception
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation)
|
|
Experimental: tDCS (transcranial direct-current stimulation)
|
|
Experimental: tsDCS (transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
The Visual numeric scale of pain between the three groups
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 month
|
Baseline to 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) between the three groups
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
|
The SF12 quality of life questionnaire between the three groups
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) between the three groups
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
|
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scale (NPSI) between the three groups
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
|
Evolution of the conductance of feet and hands by using Sudoscan
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
The body conductance will be used to assess the evolution of the Impact of the neurostimulation on the sympathetic nervous system and on the small fiber neuropathy.
|
Baseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Modifications of the sensori-motor cortical cards by using a MRI
Time Frame: Baseline, and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Baseline, and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
- Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Fregni F, Freedman S, Pascual-Leone A. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):188-91. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70032-7.
- Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899.
- Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
- Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;114(11):2220-2; author reply 2222-3. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00235-9. No abstract available.
- Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
- Picarelli H, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC, Myczkowski ML, Luvisotto TB, Yeng LT, Fonoff ET, Pridmore S, Marcolin MA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is efficacious as an add-on to pharmacological therapy in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, Ahmed MA, Sadek R, Rothwell JC. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):833-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.055806.
- Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in chronic neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1568-74. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242731.10074.3c.
- de Andrade DC, Mhalla A, Adam F, Texeira MJ, Bouhassira D. Neuropharmacological basis of rTMS-induced analgesia: the role of endogenous opioids. Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
- Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Poulet E, Devanne H, Haffen E, Londero A, Cretin B, Leroi AM, Radtchenko A, Saba G, Thai-Van H, Litre CF, Vercueil L, Bouhassira D, Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Mylius V, Nicolier M, Garcia-Larrea L. [French guidelines on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): safety and therapeutic indications]. Neurophysiol Clin. 2011 Dec;41(5-6):221-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.10.062. Epub 2011 Nov 10. French.
- Lefaucheur JP, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Goujon C, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Predictive value of rTMS in the identification of responders to epidural motor cortex stimulation therapy for pain. J Pain. 2011 Oct;12(10):1102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
- Lefaucheur, J. P. (2007).
- Passard A, Attal N, Benadhira R, Brasseur L, Saba G, Sichere P, Perrot S, Januel D, Bouhassira D. Effects of unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex on chronic widespread pain in fibromyalgia. Brain. 2007 Oct;130(Pt 10):2661-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm189. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
- Leung A, Donohue M, Xu R, Lee R, Lefaucheur JP, Khedr EM, Saitoh Y, Andre-Obadia N, Rollnik J, Wallace M, Chen R. rTMS for suppressing neuropathic pain: a meta-analysis. J Pain. 2009 Dec;10(12):1205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 23.
- Lefaucheur JP. Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in pain relief. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):799-808. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.799.
- Medeiros LF, de Souza IC, Vidor LP, de Souza A, Deitos A, Volz MS, Fregni F, Caumo W, Torres IL. Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 28;3:110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00110. eCollection 2012.
- Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Gosseries O, Laureys S, Bruno MA. [Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for neurostimulation]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Feb;169(2):108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Sep 7. French.
- Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L, Bravo R, Rigonatti SP, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98. doi: 10.1002/art.22195.
- Antal A, Kriener N, Lang N, Boros K, Paulus W. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011 May;31(7):820-8. doi: 10.1177/0333102411399349. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
- Mori F, Codeca C, Kusayanagi H, Monteleone F, Buttari F, Fiore S, Bernardi G, Koch G, Centonze D. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Pain. 2010 May;11(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
- Antal A, Terney D, Kuhnl S, Paulus W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):890-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023.
- O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. A report of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):309-26. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
- Zaghi S, Thiele B, Pimentel D, Pimentel T, Fregni F. Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):439-51. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0615.
- Luedtke K, Rushton A, Wright C, Geiss B, Juergens TP, May A. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the reduction of clinical and experimentally induced pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):452-61. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823853e3.
- O'Connell NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 11;(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub3.
- Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Pulecchi F, Marceglia S, Priori A. Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.249. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
- Truini A, Vergari M, Biasiotta A, La Cesa S, Gabriele M, Di Stefano G, Cambieri C, Cruccu G, Inghilleri M, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation inhibits nociceptive spinal pathway conduction and increases pain tolerance in humans. Eur J Pain. 2011 Nov;15(10):1023-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 May 14.
- Toshev PK, Guleyupoglu B, Bikson M. Informing dose design by modeling transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2147-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 4. No abstract available.
- Priori A, Ciocca M, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Ferrucci R. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists. J Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;592(16):3345-69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.270280. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Cogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Vergari M, Ferrucci R, Ciocca M, Scelzo E, Barbieri S, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 4;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00063. eCollection 2012.
- Plow EB, Pascual-Leone A, Machado A. Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain. J Pain. 2012 May;13(5):411-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
- Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ahdab R, Ciampi de Andrade D, Fregni F, Khedr EM, Nitsche M, Paulus W. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain. Brain Stimul. 2008 Oct;1(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
- Nizard J, Lefaucheur JP, Helbert M, de Chauvigny E, Nguyen JP. Non-invasive stimulation therapies for the treatment of refractory pain. Discov Med. 2012 Jul;14(74):21-31.
- Mhalla A, Baudic S, de Andrade DC, Gautron M, Perrot S, Teixeira MJ, Attal N, Bouhassira D. Long-term maintenance of the analgesic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in fibromyalgia. Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1478-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
- Zaghi S, DaSilva AF, Acar M, Lopes M, Fregni F. One-year rTMS treatment for refractory trigeminal neuralgia. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Oct;38(4):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 Aug 26. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):e9.
- Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Nguyen JP. Neuropathic pain controlled for more than a year by monthly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Neurophysiol Clin. 2004 Apr;34(2):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2004.02.001.
- Hodaj H, Alibeu JP, Payen JF, Lefaucheur JP. Treatment of Chronic Facial Pain Including Cluster Headache by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex With Maintenance Sessions: A Naturalistic Study. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):801-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.416. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
- Kim YJ, Ku J, Kim HJ, Im DJ, Lee HS, Han KA, Kang YJ. Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Dec;37(6):766-76. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
- M. Sorel, J.-P. Lefaucheur, J.-C. Beatrix, A.M. Domec, M.L. Giboutet, E. Houy, J. Robert, P. Cesaro (2012); Complex regional pain syndrome: interest in coupling the vascular phase of technetium 99 bone scintigraphy with the effectiveness of ketamine. Lett. Méd. Phys. Réadapt., OI 10.1007/s11659-012-0296-1
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 25, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 11, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
February 22, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 28, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
June 29, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2022
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 38RC15.158
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on rTMS
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanRecruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruiting
-
Changping LaboratoryBeijing HuiLongGuan HospitalRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder | Severe Depression | Moderate DepressionChina
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompleted
-
Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceRecruitingTo Evaluate the Effectiveness of Open rTMSFrance
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Bayside HealthCompletedAutistic Disorder | Asperger's DisorderAustralia
-
Changping LaboratoryWuhan Mental Health CentreRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder | Severe Depression | Moderate DepressionChina
-
Prof. Dominique de Quervain, MDRecruiting