Study Assessing Evaluation of the Interest of Serum S100B Protein Determination in the Management of Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (PROS100B)

January 4, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Interventional Study Assessing Evaluation of the Interest of Serum S100B Protein Determination in the Management of Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a very common reason for presentation to pediatric emergency departments. So as not to overlook the risk of complications, which occur at a rate of 0-7%, measures such as cranial computed tomography (CCT-scan) and/or short inpatient observation are prescribed. Ultimately, the majority of these measures could be avoided and a large Australian cohort shows that the risk of brain tumors is 2.44 times higher for children who had a CCT-scan (3.24 for age 1-4 years). Assay of a sensitive biomarker in blood, such as the S100B protein, has the potential to reduce the number of these unnecessary measures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Based on initial results from a previous prospective study, a multicenter interventional study will be necessary to validate the routine use of this biomarker .The ultimate goal is to include serum S100B assay in the current recommendations for m traumatic brain injury (mTBI) management based on the study of Kupperman et al. (2009), as mTBI accounts for 5-8% of pediatric emergency admissions in France (60-100 per 100,000 children). The study of Kuppermann et al. strongly dictated the recommendations for mTBI management by the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU) . Then, from these 2 publications, the French Society of Pediatrics (SFP) redacted their recommendations after adjustment method recommendations for clinical practice, used by the French High Authority of Health (HAS) .

The use of serum S100B assay as part of the management of pediatric mTBI should make it possible to reduce the number of additional examinations, in particular a 30% reduction in the number of CCT-scans, with a resultant reduction in radiation exposure, known to be a risk factor for cancer. The study protocol corresponds to a diagnostic prospective, controlled, multicenter study using a randomized stepped wedge cluster design, in which pediatric patients (aged ≤ 16 years) presenting to the pediatric emergency room for mTBI with a GCS score of 15 will benefit from usual care ("conventional management" arm) in the control group, and from S100B management in the interventional group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2209

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Chu Clermont-Ferrand
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Limoges Teaching hospital
      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Montpellier Teaching hopsital
      • Nantes, France, 44036
        • Nantes Teaching Hospital
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Nice Teaching Hospital
      • Nimes, France, 30900
        • Nimes Teaching Hospital
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • Reims Teaching Hospital
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • Saint-Etienne Teaching Hospital
      • Vichy, France, 03200
        • Vichy Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≤ 16 years Therapeutic management within 3 hours after TBI

GCS score of 15 classically requiring hospitalization and/or CCT-scan as per SFP recommendations (Lorton et al., 2014). These criteria are:

  • For children aged under 2 years (CCT-scan or hospitalization recommended according to physician's evaluation):
  • Parietal or occipital scalp hematoma,
  • Loss of consciousness for more than 5 seconds,
  • Trauma due to serious accident (road accident with passenger ejected from vehicle or death of another person or rollover; pedestrian hit by a moving vehicle; cyclist not wearing a helmet; fall from a height greater than 0.9 meter),
  • Abnormal behavior in the opinion of parents.
  • For children 2 years and older (CCT-scan or hospitalization recommended according to physician's evaluation):
  • Loss of consciousness at time of accident,
  • Vomiting,
  • Trauma due to serious accident (road accident with passenger ejected from vehicle or death of another person or rollover; pedestrian hit by a moving vehicle; cyclist not wearing a helmet; fall from a height greater than 1.5 meter),
  • Severe headache.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient already enrolled in another therapeutic trial with drug administration Down syndrome Melanoma Refusal of child Refusal of parents or legal guardian Trauma more than 3 hours earlier GCS score of 13 or 14, or signs of skull fracture or lesions of the skull base (CCT-scan recommended)

Children with TBI not requiring hospitalization and/or CCT-scan as per SFP recommendations (Lorton et al., 2014). This group is defined by the absence of the following criteria:

  • GCS score different from 15,
  • Age < 3 months,
  • Seriousness of accident:
  • road accident with passenger ejected from vehicle or death of another person or rollover,
  • pedestrian hit by a moving vehicle,
  • cyclist not wearing a helmet.
  • Fall:
  • of more than 0.9 m before age 2 years,
  • of more than 1.5 m after age 2 years.
  • Loss of consciousness for 5 seconds or more,
  • Inconsolable crying,
  • Agitation, drowsiness, feeling "slowed down", obnubilation,
  • Vomiting or headache,
  • Facial or cranial hematoma,
  • Otorrhea, rhinorrhea,
  • Child under 2 years old,
  • Loss of consciousness for less than 5 seconds,
  • Unusual behaviour,
  • Concern of family members

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group
The study protocol corresponds to a diagnostic prospective, controlled, multicenter study using a randomized stepped wedge cluster design, in which pediatric patients (aged ≤ 16 years) presenting to the pediatric emergency room for mTBI with a GCS score of 15 will benefit from usual care ("conventional management" arm) in the control group, and from S100B management in the interventional group
Other: interventional group
The study protocol corresponds to a diagnostic prospective, controlled, multicenter study using a randomized stepped wedge cluster design, in which pediatric patients (aged ≤ 16 years) presenting to the pediatric emergency room for mTBI with a GCS score of 15 will benefit from usual care ("conventional management" arm) in the control group, and from S100B management in the interventional group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
utility of serum S100B measurement in the management of pediatric mTBI
Time Frame: at day 1
Evaluate the utility of serum S100B measurement in the management of pediatric mTBI by demonstrating a decrease in the proportion of CCT-scan prescribed in the "S100B management" intervention arm compared with the "conventional management" control arm, hypothesizing a 30% decrease in the number of CCT-scan between the intervention versus control arms.
at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to reduction in the time spent in the pediatric emergency room
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to reduction in the duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to reduction in radiation exposure (mSv)
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to detection of complications
Time Frame: at day 1
detection of complications (intracranial lesions) by CCT-scan which can occur at a rate of 0-7% in patients with mTBI (American Academy of Pediatrics, 1999)
at day 1
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to absence of intercurrent events at 48 hours and 3 weeks after mTBI
Time Frame: at 48 hours and 3 weeks after mTBI
at 48 hours and 3 weeks after mTBI
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to compliance of emergency physicians with the S100B assay
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
utility of serum S100B measurement with respect to reduction of the cost of management
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Craniocerebral Trauma

Clinical Trials on usual care

3
Subscribe