- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02835157
Balanced Crystalloid vs. Saline in Children With Septic Shock
Multiple Electrolyte Solution vs. Saline in Pediatric Septic Shock
Fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of pediatric shock management; current practices of fluid resuscitation in children are not evidence based. Normal saline is the preferred crystalloid recommended during initial resuscitation in shock, as the incidence of hyponatremia is lower with normal saline compared to all other fluids available and commonly used. However, normal saline has its own set of undesired physicochemical actions. Emerging data strongly indicate the increased incidence of hyperchloremia, metabolic acidosis and consequently, acute kidney injury associated with infusion of large volumes of normal saline. Balanced salt solutions or crystalloids, which have composition resembling plasma but lower chloride concentrations than normal saline, clearly decrease the risk of hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis in adult as well as pediatric studies when used during the peri-operative period. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. Recent systematic reviews comparing balanced or buffered versus non-buffered fluids for surgery in adults favored the former solution as the metabolic derangements were less with the use of this type of fluid. In adult patients, the two solutions have been compared in various other settings as well such as in traumatic brain injury and in shock. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. However, in the non-surgical setting there is a paucity of evidence on the use of these solutions in children with shock and more evidence needs to be generated to support or refute the use of this fluid as compared to normal saline.
Given this background, the investigators decided to compare the effect of two solutions on the incidence of acute kidney injury in children resuscitated with either of the two fluids. Children receiving at least one fluid bolus at 20 ml/kg in the first hour would be enrolled and followed up for the proposed outcome variables. The investigators plan to enroll 708 patients over a period of 3 years. The investigators believe that the proposed study will provide answer to the research question of which of the fluids could be preferred for resuscitation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background
Fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of pediatric shock management; current practices of fluid resuscitation in children are not evidence based. Emerging data strongly indicate the increased incidence of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and consequently, acute kidney injury associated with infusion of large volumes of normal saline in critically ill adults in shock. Balanced salt solutions or crystalloids, which have composition resembling plasma but lower chloride concentrations than normal saline, have shown to decrease the risk of hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis in adult as well as pediatric studies when used during the peri-operative period. In adult patients, the two solutions have been compared in various other settings as well such as in traumatic brain injury and in shock. The results favored balanced solutions in comparison to normal saline. However, in the non-surgical setting there is a paucity of evidence on the use of these solutions in children with shock and more evidence needs to be generated to support or refute the use of this fluid as compared to normal saline.
Objectives
Primary To examine if use of 'balanced crystalloids (multiple electrolyte solution)" results in lower incidence of new or progressive Acute kidney injury (defined as increase in serum creatinine by > 0.3mg/dL within 48 hours or to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours) in the first seven days after initial fluid resuscitation as compared to saline.
Secondary
To evaluate the difference if any, between two fluid types with regard to the following secondary objectives such as:
- Incidence of hyperchloremia (defined as serum chloride levels >108 mEq/L) at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hrs of fluid resuscitation.
- Incidence of metabolic acidosis at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hrs of fluid resuscitation.
- Requirement of fluid boluses in first 6 hrs and total fluids in first 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours.
- Proportion of patients achieving the pre-determined therapeutic end points at 6, 24, 48 hours and 72 hours after fluid resuscitation.
- Need for inotrope therapy in first 7 days.
- Change in SOFA scores and PELOD scores at 24 hours and 48 hours.
- Time to resolution of AKI.
- In- ICU mortality rates.
- Ventilator free days, ICU free days and Hospital free days.
Site of study
Pediatric emergency and PICU, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of medical Sciences,New Delhi
Other sites
PGIMER, Chandigarh, JIPMER Puducherry and St Johns Medical College Bengaluru
Study Design
Randomized controlled trial (safety and superiority for kidney injury). Multicenter trial.
Study Duration
3 years
Study definitions
Septic shock is defined as children who have a suspected infection manifested by hypothermia or hyperthermia and have at least two clinical signs of decreased perfusion with or without hypotension such as decreased mental status, prolonged capillary refill of >2 secs (cold shock) or flash capillary refill (warm shock), diminished (cold shock) or bounding (warm shock) peripheral pulses, mottled cool extremities (cold shock), or decreased urine output of <1 ml/kg/hr).
Therapeutic end points
- Normal heart rate
- Appropriate-for-age mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured non-invasively;
- Normal pulses with no difference between peripheral and central pulses, warm extremities;
- Capillary refill time <2 seconds;
- Normal mental status;
- Urine output ≥ 1mL/kg/hr,
Hyperchloremia: Defined as serum chloride value of >108 meq/L, based on our laboratory cut off of 98-108 meq/L Metabolic acidosis: pH of less than 7.35 with serum bicarbonate < 24 meq/L with low to normal pCO2 (<40 mm Hg)
Acute kidney injury: An abrupt (within 48-hr) reduction in kidney function defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of more than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl, an increase in serum creatinine of more than or equal to 1.5 fold from the value preceding the abnormal value, or reduction in urine output (oliguria of less than 0.5 ml/kg per hour for >6-hr).
Enrollment
All children with features of shock as per standard definitions will be screened for eligibility. Of these, children who require at least one fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg will be enrolled. The eligible participants would be enrolled after obtaining informed consent from one of the parents.
Randomization
Once enrolled, the participants would be randomized into 2 groups. 'MES' or 'study group' will receive the balanced fluids and 'saline' or 'control group' will receive 0.9% saline. Process of randomization will be done by an investigator who will have no further role in collecting the baseline variables, applying intervention or analysis of outcome(s). Block randomization will be done in varying block sizes of 2 to 8. The random number table generated from computer software would be used for this purpose.
Sample size estimation
The investigators calculated that a sample size of 354 patients in each group (708 total) would be required to detect an absolute reduction in incidence of AKI from 25% (current incidence in children with shock in the unit) to 15% assuming a two-sided α level of 0.05 and a statistical power of 90%. The sample size was calculated using Stata 11. The investigators expect the required sample size to be collected within 3 years period in the three centers.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Chandigarh, India
- PGIMER
-
Puducherry, India, 605006
- JIPMER
-
-
Delhi
-
New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110029
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, 560034
- St Johns Medical College and Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children 2 month to ≤ 15 years with features of septic shock - defined as children who have a suspected infection manifested by hypothermia or hyperthermia and have at least two clinical signs of decreased perfusion with or without hypotension
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children receiving fluid boluses before enrollment
- Children with cardiogenic shock
- Known patient with chronic kidney disease with baseline deranged renal function (eGFR < 90 ml/1.73 m2/min)
- Severe malnutrition
- Children whose parents refuse to give an informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Balanced crystalloid or multiple electrolyte solution group
After enrollment, a fluid bolus comprising of 'multiple electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte P)' solution at a dose of 20 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes (recommended) with careful monitoring for features of fluid overload would be administered to each child.
Fluid resuscitation will be targeted at achieving the therapeutic end points as given in study definitions.
After this the management protocol will be as per recommendations of the American College of Critical Care Medicine 2017 for septic shock in children.
|
Multiple electrolyte solution as boluses would be administered.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: 0.9% saline or saline group
After enrollment, a fluid bolus comprising of 'saline' solution at a dose of 20 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes (recommended) with careful monitoring for features of fluid overload would be administered to each child.
Fluid resuscitation will be targeted at achieving the therapeutic end points as given in study definitions.
After this the management protocol will be as per recommendations of the American College of Critical Care Medicine 2017 for septic shock in children.
|
saline as boluses would be administered
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
New or progressive acute kidney injury defined as increase in serum creatinine by > 0.3mg/dL within 48 hours or to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours
Time Frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
|
Incidence of new or progressive AKI in first 7 days after randomization/ intervention
|
From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of patients with serum chloride levels > 108 meq/L at admission, 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours
Time Frame: At 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
|
Incidence of hyperchloremia
|
At 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
|
|
Number of fluid boluses received in the first 6 hours after randomization
Time Frame: From the time of randomization to 6 hours
|
Total number of fluid boluses received in the first 6 hours after randomization/intervention
|
From the time of randomization to 6 hours
|
|
Total fluids received in the first 24 hours, 24-48 hours and 48-72hrs in ml/kg after randomization
Time Frame: From the time of randomization to 72 hours
|
Total fluids received in first 24 hours, 24-48 hours and 48-72 hours
|
From the time of randomization to 72 hours
|
|
Mortality (serious adverse event)
Time Frame: From the time of randomization till death or discharge from ICU, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
|
Death during ICU course
|
From the time of randomization till death or discharge from ICU, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
|
|
Time to resolution of AKI
Time Frame: From the time of onset of AKI after randomization till death or discharge from hospital, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
|
Time taken for resolution of AKI
|
From the time of onset of AKI after randomization till death or discharge from hospital, whichever came first assessed upto 100 days
|
|
SOFA scores at 24 and 48 hours after randomization
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
|
Comparison of SOFA scores in both groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after randomization
|
At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
|
|
PELOD scores at 24 and 48 hours after randomization
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
|
Comparison of PELOD scores in both groups at 24 hours and 48 hours after randomization
|
At 24 and 48 hours after randomization
|
|
Incidence of metabolic acidosis at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
Time Frame: At admission and at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
|
Comparison of number of children in both groups with acidosis at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
|
At admission and at 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after randomization
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety outcome 1
Time Frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
|
New or progressive AKI requiring dialysis (serious adverse event)
|
From the time of randomization/intervention to 7 days of admission
|
|
Safety outcome 2
Time Frame: From the time of randomization/intervention to mortality
|
IN-ICU mortality in patients with AKI (serious adverse event)
|
From the time of randomization/intervention to mortality
|
|
Safety outcome 3
Time Frame: From the time of initiating the bolus to its completion
|
Infusion related adverse events- fever, rash, extravasation, hypervolemia/fluid overload
|
From the time of initiating the bolus to its completion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jhuma Sankar, MD Ped, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
- Study Chair: Sushil K Kabra, MD Ped, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
- Study Director: Rakesh Lodha, MD Ped, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IEC/NP-424/09.10.2015
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shock
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTraumabase Group; Capgemini Invent; Ecole polytechnique; EHESS (Ecole des hautes... and other collaboratorsCompletedWounds and Injuries | Hemorrhagic Shock | Traumatic ShockFrance
-
Biomedizinische Forschungs gmbHMedical University of ViennaCompletedSepsis | Toxic-Shock Syndrome
-
Haukeland University HospitalMinistry of Defence, NorwayCompletedHemorrhagic Shock | Hypovolemic ShockNorway
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity Hospital BirminghamCompletedTraumatic Haemorrhagic ShockUnited Kingdom
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
University of ManitobaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); CancerCare ManitobaTerminatedSeptic Shock | Vasodilatory ShockCanada, United States, Brazil, Greece, India, Pakistan, Philippines
-
Massachusetts General HospitalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston Medical Center; Tufts Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Jason SperryNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Washington; Resuscitation Outcomes ConsortiumCompletedHemorrhagic ShockUnited States
Clinical Trials on Balanced crystalloid solution
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalB. Braun Medical International Trading Company Ltd.Recruiting
-
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research...Monash University; The AlfredNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruitingBleeding | Massive Hemorrhage | Massive Transfusion Protocol
-
University Hospital RijekaUniversity of RijekaUnknown
-
University of EdinburghCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingLiver Cirrhosis | Liver Transplant; Complications | End Stage Liver DIseaseKorea, Republic of
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompleted
-
University of LouisvilleKentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research BoardRecruitingTraumatic Brain Injury (TBI) PatientsUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedAbdominal Neoplasms | Gynecologic NeoplasmsKorea, Republic of
-
Seoul National University HospitalNot yet recruitingCardiac SurgerySouth Korea