Comparison of Two Electroencephalograms (EEG) Monitors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

February 20, 2023 updated by: Roya Yumul, M.D.,PhD., Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Monitoring the Responses to Nociceptive Stimuli During General Anesthesia Based on Electroencephalographic Signals, an Observational Study

Hypothesis:

There is a statistically measurable correlation between qNOX and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception such as movements during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion, skin Incision, LMA removal. It will reduce the problem of anticipating the nociception in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Objectives:

  1. to compare two indexes of hypnosis, the qCON (Quantium Medical, Spain) with the Bispectral index (BIS™) (Covidien, Boulder CO. USA), in patients undergoing surgery under sedation and general anesthesia.
  2. to assess the qNOX index of pain/nociception (Quantium Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and the qCON index of hypnosis.
  3. to assess qNOX reliability as a specific indicator of response to nociceptive stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Monitoring the anti-nociceptive drug effect is useful because a sudden and strong nociceptive stimulus may result in untoward autonomic responses and muscular reflex movements. Unopposed stimulation may also 'overrule' a state of stable unconsciousness, with resultant awakening and awareness. The traditional clinical use of systolic or mean blood pressure is actually still one of the methods in everyday use for this monitoring purpose. Another cornerstone is the experience of which drugs and doses are effective in attenuating nociception. Alpiger and colleagues found that simple end-tidal monitoring of sevoflurane was a better predictor of nociceptive response than Auditory Evoked Potential.

Thus, monitoring the state of anti-nociception with objective, non-clinical methods is still in a state of testing and development, without well-documented and proven methods for consistent 'no-fuss' clinical daily use. Some methods, like those using systolic blood pressure, are based on the reduced sympathetic response from the Central Nervous System (CNS) when in a state of drug-induced anti-nociception during concomitant surgical stress. These include the pulse plethysmogram amplitude, heart rate variability and/or amplitude, pupillometry, muscle tonus and skin conductance.They all have limitations in interpretation, as the state of sympathetic tone is strongly influenced by numerous factors, including hypovolemia, vasopressors, atropine and patient positioning. In addition, sympathetic tone is very unspecific in the awake or lightly sedated patient, as mood and subjective feelings have a strong impact.

Attempts are also been made on using the EEG for monitoring of anti-nociception. This approach has been challenged as difficult, as most of the antinociceptive drugs effects are in the periphery, the medullary cord or deeper cerebral layers, far from the EEG signals derived from the frontal cortex. However, EEG is a 'mirror' of what is going on in other parts of the CNS and peripheral nervous system. One problem is to elucidate how the EEG signals may be used in a sensitive and specific way to reflect anti-nociception. Concepts such as response-entropy, Composite Variability Index and BIS variability score have been tested and launched.

Quantium Medical has an EEG-based algorithm with two outputs: the qCON for unconsciousness and the qNOX for anti-nociception. This means that calculates and displays two indices. One, the qCON, is designed to provide information about the depth of the hypnotic state, similar to that provided by the BIS™ and Sedline™ monitor (Masimo, Irvine CA). The second index, the qNOX, is designed to provide information about the depth of the antinociceptive state. The qCON has shown a comparable performance with BIS, and qNOX has proved correlation with rough clinical signs of insufficient antinociception, such as movements during LMA insertion, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo general surgical procedures with general anesthesia/LMA.
  • Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document.
  • 18 - 80 years of age.
  • ASA Class I - III adults of either sex

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to consent
  • Withdrawal criteria
  • Electrodes should be changed when patient's skin impedance value exceeds 15 kΩ after conditioning skin properly. If after two changes of electrodes, impedance remains above 15 kΩ, patient will be excluded from the present study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Depth of Anesthesia
Subjects will have the qCON-qNOX and BIS monitor
Each subject will have the qCON-qNOX monitor on his/her forehead + the BIS monitor
Each subject will have the BIS monitor on his/her forehead + the qCON-qNOX monitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
qNOX-qCON, BIS and rough clinical signs
Time Frame: One day
correlation between qNOX-qNOX, BIS and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception such as movements during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion, skin Incision, LMA removal
One day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Index of pain (nociception)
Time Frame: One Day
assessing of the qNOX index of pain (nociception)
One Day
Indexes of hypnosis
Time Frame: One Day
comparison of two indexes of hypnosis, the qCON (Quantium Medical, Spain) with the Bispectral index (BIS™)
One Day
Index of pain-nociception
Time Frame: One Day
assessing the qCON index of hypnosis
One Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on qCON-qNOX

3
Subscribe