Interferon-free Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Opioid-substituted Patients (INFO)

April 27, 2021 updated by: Prof. Dr. med. Jens Reimer, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Effectiveness and Safety of Interferon-free Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Opioid-substituted Patients

The primary objective of study will be to evaluate the effectiveness of interferon-free direct acting antivirals (IFN-free DAAs) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) among patients in opioid-substitution treatment (OST). We hypothesize that rates of sustained virological response will be comparable to non-OST populations. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of safety data, patients' adherence and patient reported outcome measures like functioning (disability), satisfaction with the treatment, health status, general health perceptions and health-related quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The new interferon-free antiviral regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infections achieve impressive sustained virological response (SVR) rates beyond 90%, with shorter treatment duration and reduced side effects, irrespective of previous treatment history or presence of advanced liver diseases.

In Europe, the majority of HCV infections have been acquired and transmitted through injecting drug use - therefore, people who inject drugs (PWID) represent the majority of individuals with CHC infections in the Western industrialized cultures. There are excellent therapeutic options for those PWID who are in OST, as the frequent treatment provider-patient contact allows regular diagnoses, a continuing monitoring, and a sustainable management of HCV-infection among these patients. However, despite the growing evidence that patients in OST can successfully be treated for HCV, the treatment uptake among this predominant risk group is still very low. The current evidence from non-drug using populations only have a limited impact on the willingness of physicians providing opioid substitution treatment (OST), hepatologists and infectiologists to provide antiviral HCV treatment with IFN-free DAAs and on the willingness of OST patients to enter such treatment. Accordingly, data on the effectiveness and safety of antiviral HCV treatment regimens with IFN-free DAAs among this relevant patient group are urgently needed. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to assess the effectiveness, safety and patient reported outcome measures of IFN-free DAAs for the treatment of CHC among OST patients.

The primary objective of this open-label, observational, prospective cohort study will be to evaluate the effectiveness of IFN-free DAAs regimens for the treatment of chronic HCV-infection among OST patients in real life clinical settings.

Patients will be treated for chronic HCV with any kind of registered IFN-free DAA protocol and in accordance with the respective SmPC. This ensures that that dosing and schedule are supported by Phase I or later research. The study physician will make any medical decisions with regard to type of medication and doses. The individual treatment duration depends on the respective treatment protocol. The study physician is responsible for any medical decision and will document treatment dosage, treatment schedule, treatment duration and outcome.

Effectiveness is defined as sustained virological response at week 12 and week 24 after end of treatment (SVR12 and SVR24). SVR rates will be compared with the literature on non-substance using populations on the basis of two-sided 95% confidence intervals. The sample size calculation revealed, that 295 OST patients (HCV treatment naïve/Non-responder/Relapser) eligible for treatment with IFN-free DAAs (according to the summary of product (SmPC)) have to be included. To account for dropouts, we consider an over-recruitment of 10%, resulting in 325 patients to be recruited.

Secondary objectives include the collection of safety data during the treatment phase until SVR12, patients' adherence, and patient reported outcome measures like functioning (disability), satisfaction with the treatment, health status, general health perceptions and health-related quality of life.

All analyses - effectiveness and safety - will be conducted as intention-to-treat (ITT) as well as per protocol (PP) analyses. The ITT sample is defined as the number of patients starting treatment (first dose), whereas the PP sample includes only patients with complete data for SVR24.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

326

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10439
        • Zentrum für Infektiologie Berlin Prenzlauer Berg GmbH
      • Berlin, Germany, 10551
        • Praxisgemeinschaft Turmstraße
      • Berlin, Germany, 10969
        • Praxis Gabriele U. Bellmann/ Norbert E. Lyonn Fachärzte für Allgemeinmedizin
      • Berlin, Germany, 12043
        • Praxis Micus
      • Berlin, Germany, 14057
        • Praxiszentrum Kaiserdamm
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Praxis D. Höpner/M. H. Besson
      • Bremen, Germany, 28719
        • Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Tietje, Koc, Schulte
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60329
        • MainFachArzt
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22149
        • Medizentrum Hamburg
      • Hanover, Germany, 30449
        • Kompetenzzentrum für Suchtmedizin und Infektiologie
      • Kassel, Germany, 34117
        • Praxiszentrum Friedrichsplatz
      • Köln, Germany, 50679
        • Gemeinschaftspraxis Gotenring
      • Muenchen, Germany, 80331
        • Praxis Lebentrau
      • Munich, Germany, 48143
        • CIM GmbH Infektiologische Praxisgemeinschaft Busch/Christensen
      • Munich, Germany, 80801
        • Schwerpunktpraxis "Concept"
      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70197
        • Dres. Ulmer, Frietsch, Müller, Roll
      • Wuppertal, Germany, 42277
        • PG Mauruschat/Weilbrenner
    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80331
        • Praxiszentrum Im Tal (PIT)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with chronic HCV-genotype 1-6, aged over 18 years, who are for a minimum of 3 months in opioid substitution treatment and who are beginning an antiviral HCV treatment with interferon-free direct acting antivirals (IFN-free DAAs)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged over 18 years
  • opioid dependence according to ICD-10
  • admission to opioid substitution treatment for at least 3 months
  • Chronic hepatitis C infection with genotype 1-6
  • eligibility for antiviral HCV treatment with IFN-free DAAs according to the respective summary of product characteristics (SmPC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • missing eligibility for antiviral HCV treatment with IFN-free DAAs according to SmPC
  • inability of the patient to participate in the study (e.g. due to severe mental impairment)
  • missing patient-signed written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained virological response
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA, will be assessed up to 36 weeks after baseline The individual treatment duration depends on the respective treatment protocol and varies between 8 and 24 weeks.
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation subject administered study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Patient-reported physical health status, as measured with the Opiate Treatment Index Health Scale (OTI-HSS)
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Patient-reported physical health status, as measured with the Opiate Treatment Index Health Scale (OTI-HSS)
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Patient-reported mental health status, as measured with the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18)
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Patient-reported mental health status, as measured with the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18)
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Health related quality of life, as measured with the short form 12 (SF-12, version 1)
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Health related quality of life, as measured with the short form 12 (SF-12, version 1)
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
Questionnaire on patient-reported fatigue and subjective cognitive impairments
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline
This is a self-developed questionnaire with 12 items (5 items on fatigue, and 7 items on subjective cognitive deficits), each item to be rated on a 5-point Likert-Scale.
through study completion, up to 36 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jens Reimer, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C, Chronic

3
Subscribe