Melancholic Symptoms in Bipolar Depression and Responsiveness to Lamotrigine

September 19, 2018 updated by: Evyn Peters, University of Saskatchewan

Melancholic Symptoms in Bipolar Depression and Responsiveness to Lamotrigine: Results From an 8-week, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with melancholic bipolar II depression are more responsive to lamotrigine than patients with non-melancholic bipolar II depression. To do this, the investigators will re-analyze a previous clinical trial that evaluated lamotrigine as a treatment for bipolar II depression (GSK-SCA100223; NCT00274677).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients suffering from depression with melancholic symptoms (i.e., anhedonia, flat affect, diurnal mood variation, terminal insomnia, psychomotor disturbances, decreased weight/appetite, and excessive guilt) respond better to certain antidepressants. Melancholic symptoms also occur in bipolar depression, although they have received less research. Lamotrigine has been shown to alter some of the biological processes that are known to occur in melancholic depression. The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with melancholic bipolar II depression are more responsive to lamotrigine than patients with non-melancholic bipolar II depression.

This study will re-analyze data from a previous 8-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated lamotrigine as a treatment for bipolar II depression (GSK-SCA100223; NCT00274677). The original study data was made available by GlaxoSmithKline as part of an initiative to make clinical trials data available for research use. Access was applied for via https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

The analysis strategy will be comparable to the original study, although the investigators will first classify participants as suffering from either melancholic or non-melancholic depression. The diagnosis of melancholic depression was established according to baseline responses to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria. HAMD-17 and MADRS change scores will be compared between the treatment and placebo groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Both ANOVA models will include a test for an interaction between treatment group (lamotrigine vs. placebo) and melancholic depression (melancholic depression vs. non-melancholic depression). To handle missing data, each ANOVA model will be computed with only complete-case data first and subsequently using inverse probability weights that account for the probability of drop out. Inverse probability weights will be created based on covariates that predict missing responses. HAMD-17 and MADRS response rates between the treatment and placebo groups will be evaluated with a Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. There will be two separate analyses, one including participants with melancholic depression, and one including participants with non-melancholic depression. Statistical models will also adjust for baseline depression severity, if participants with melancholic depression are found to have more severe depressive symptoms at baseline.

Given the delay between antidepressant initiation and response, trial-and-error prescribing is an inevitably lengthy process. The investigators hope the results of this study will enable more timely and effective treatment for patients with bipolar depression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N0W8
        • Department of Psychiatry, Royal University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must provide written and informed consent.
  2. Diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder and currently depressed for minimum of the last 8 weeks, with a HAMD-17 score of at least 18 with scores of 3 or more on Items 1 or 7.
  3. For females, be of non-childbearing potential, or of childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at screening and agrees to one of (a) abstinence from sex two weeks prior and five days after drug continuation/discontinuation, (b) personal or partner sterilization, (c) one method of hormonal contraception, or (d) two barrier methods of contraception.
  4. Acceptable results (within two times the normal limit) on laboratory screening tests (e.g., thyroid function).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active suicidality.
  2. History of non-response to antidepressant treatment, or any previous treatment with lamotrigine.
  3. History of substance dependence in the past year, or abuse within the 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  4. Rapid cycling bipolar disorder.
  5. Receiving additional psychoactive medication (not including lorazepam for agitation), or has started a new course of psychotherapy within the last month.
  6. Received treatment for an anxiety or eating disorder within the last 12 months.
  7. Investigational drug use within the last month.
  8. History of epilepsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lamotrigine - melancholic depression
Participants with melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive lamotrigine tablets escalated to a target dose of 200mg/day.
Lamotrigine tablets at dosages of 25mg/day for Week 1 and Week 2, 50mg/day for Week 3 and Week 4, 100mg/day for Week 5, and 200mg/day for Week 6, Week 7, and Week 8.
Other Names:
  • Lamictal
Placebo Comparator: Placebo - melancholic depression
Participants with melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive a placebo comparator.
Placebo tablets
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Lamotrigine - nonmelancholic depression
Participants not meeting DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive lamotrigine tablets escalated to a target dose of 200mg/day.
Lamotrigine tablets at dosages of 25mg/day for Week 1 and Week 2, 50mg/day for Week 3 and Week 4, 100mg/day for Week 5, and 200mg/day for Week 6, Week 7, and Week 8.
Other Names:
  • Lamictal
Placebo Comparator: Placebo - nonmelancholic depression
Participants not meeting DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for melancholic depression who were randomly assigned to receive a placebo comparator.
Placebo tablets
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Change Scores
Time Frame: Eight weeks

Scale scores range from 0 to 60. This outcome is a change score calculated by subtracting Baseline from Week 8 scores.

Lower scores indicate greater improvement of depressive symptoms.

Eight weeks
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Change Scores
Time Frame: Eight weeks

Scale scores range from 0 to 52. This outcome is a change score calculated by subtracting Baseline from Week 8 scores.

Lower scores indicate greater improvement of depressive symptoms.

Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Seven weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Seven weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Six weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Six weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Five weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Five weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Four weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Four weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Three weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Three weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Two weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Two weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: One week
Scale scores range from 0 to 60. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
One week
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Eight weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Eight weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Seven weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Seven weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Six weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Six weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Five weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Five weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Four weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Four weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Three weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Three weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Two weeks
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
Two weeks
Number of Participants With 50% Reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: One week
Scale scores range from 0 to 52. A response is defined as a score reduction from baseline of at least 50%.
One week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rudy C Bowen, FRCPC, University of Saskatchewan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Patient-level data for the study (GSK-SCA100223; NCT00274677) is available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Lamotrigine

3
Subscribe