Neurophysiological and Acute Pharmacological Studies in FXS Patients

The aim of this study is to utilize neurophysiologic assessments, behavioral measures and clinical measures to assess how much deficits associated with Fragile X Syndrome from pre-dose to post-dose using pharmacology.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects ages 15-55, with fragile X syndrome (FXS) who completed the study entitled "Mechanisms and brain circuits underlying fragile X syndrome (IRB # 2015-8425). FXS is defined as full FMR1 mutations (>200 CGG repeats) confirmed by genetic testing.
  • General good health as determined by physical exam, medical history and laboratory work up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of intolerance to acamprosate, lovastatin, or minocycline will be excluded.
  • Subjects will also be excluded if they have taken any investigational drug within 3 months, have a history of substance abuse or dependence within 6 months, or significant psychiatric or central nervous system neurological disease unrelated to FXS.
  • Uncontrolled seizures impact EEG data as do anticonvulsants, barbiturates, lithium and benzodiazepines and are exclusions (within 5 half-lives). Those taking other psychiatric medications must be on stable doses for 4 weeks before any testing.
  • For female subjects of child bearing potential, a positive urine pregnancy test.
  • Potential subjects with a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min will be excluded.
  • Identified medical issues, inability to tolerate study procedures or study drug per the discretion of the Principal Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All Study Participants
Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed.
two 666mg pills
two 20mg pills
two 135mg pills
placebo pill
one 30mg pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in EEG Relative Gamma Power
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 4-hour post-dose
EEG relative gamma power at rest was calculated as the percent of power in the gamma frequencies relative to the sum of power in all frequency bands, averaged across electrodes, and calculated separately at pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. To assess the impact of drug, the pre-dose relative gamma power was subtracted from post-dose relative gamma power. Higher numbers indicate more relative gamma power post-dose; lower numbers indicate more relative gamma power pre-dose.
Pre-dose, 4-hour post-dose
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement
Time Frame: 4-hour post-dose
The Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has changed relative to pre-dose, from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
4-hour post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task
Time Frame: 4-hour post-dose
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities III Auditory Attention subscale. Participants must identify orally presented words amid increasingly intense background noise. The scores for this subtask range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Raw scores for this subscale are reported (rather than standard scores, or age- or grade-equivalents).
4-hour post-dose
Change From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 4-hour post dose
Four 10-item lists of unrelated words were presented orally to the examinee who was then required to immediately recall words presented, at both pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. The impact of drug was assessed by subtracting the number of words remembered post-dose from the number of words remembered pre-dose. Lower numbers indicate more words remembered post-dose; higher numbers indicate more words remembered pre-dose.
Pre-dose, 4-hour post dose
Test of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness
Time Frame: Predose, 4-hour post-dose
Computerized task where an examinee is required to push a key when a target stimulus is presented on the screen. Scores are presented as change in median reaction time (RT), in milliseconds.
Predose, 4-hour post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fragile X Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Acamprosate

3
Subscribe