Urological and Renal Disease Engaging Adolescents in Adherence Collaborative Trial (U-REAACT)

November 8, 2023 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of behavioral feedback plus economic incentives to promote treatment adherence among a large diverse population of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with kidney transplant (KT) or spina bifida (SB).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this five-year, phase II, randomized clinical trial is to improve poor long-term health outcomes in both adolescents and young adults (AYA) with either a kidney transplant (KT) or spina bifida (SB), respectively. More specifically, this study will focus on decreasing premature allograft loss in subjects with kidney transplant (KT) due to medication nonadherence and kidney damage in subjects with SB due to urinary non-continence. To achieve these goals, this study will implement a real-time feedback system, Way to Health (WTH), that will provide education and support, increase awareness and incentivize positive health behavior, in addition to standard of care. Further, this study will investigate the mechanisms of behavior change by examining the role of financial incentives, positive feedback and the relationship between the two. The study will compare two cohorts of KT and SB subjects, which will undergo varied levels of financial incentives and positive feedback. Data from KT and SB subjects will be analyzed jointly and separately. This innovative mobile health (mhealth) strategy will improve our current measures of adherence and increase our understanding of factors that influence adherence for two AYA populations, KT and SB subjects, respectively. The study will contribute novel insight to inform the design of future interventions targeting persistence of behavior change and can be used in other centers and for other chronic disease groups.

The study intervention will use the WTH web-based platform to support AYA with KT or SB as they navigate their daily treatment burdens. This will be achieved via bi-directional text messaging, including the sending of reminders and positive feedback by WTH and the messaging of pictures of medication or catheter in hand at time of treatment by the participant. This intervention will assess sustainability of this novel bi-directional messaging system and the impact of providing education and support, increasing awareness and incentivizing positive health behavior in real-time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

465

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
        • Children's Mercy Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females age 12-24 years.
  2. Kidney Transplant subjects must be greater than 3 months post-transplant.
  3. Spina Bifida subjects must be able to perform Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC) as part of their treatment.
  4. Able to speak and read in English.
  5. Willing and able to provide informed assent or consent.
  6. Parental/guardian permission (informed consent) if appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwilling to participate.
  2. Unable to speak or read in English.
  3. Unable to provide informed assent or consent.
  4. Severe cognitive impairment, as reported by treating team in recruiting clinic.
  5. On dialysis.
  6. Acquired post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease less than one year prior to enrollment
  7. Less than 3 months post-transplant.
  8. Unable to perform CIC.
  9. Prescribed Immunosuppressive medications once per day.
  10. Provider recommendations of CIC once per day

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1 - No Feedback, Minimum Incentive
Subjects will receive daily text message reminders and report real-time treatment adherence with photos. They will receive compensation to encourage real-time adherence reporting. Subjects will also be able to log into a personal dashboard with a visual display of their weekly adherence performance and educational resources related to their primary disease. Every month, participants will receive a text encouraging them to visit their personal dashboard. The dashboard is able to track usage of the modules by individual. Parents/legal guardians will have access to these same educational materials via their own portals. Additionally, to mitigate the minimal risk of this study, parents/legal guardians will be notified if their child is excessively non-adherent.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of behavioral feedback plus economic incentives to promote treatment adherence among a large diverse population of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with kidney transplants (KT) or spina bifida (SB). In Arm 1, participants will not receive personalized feedback, nor will they receive the "extra" incentive of $10 for meeting their adherence goal.
Active Comparator: Arm 2 - Feedback, Maximum Incentive
Subjects will receive daily text message reminders and report real-time treatment adherence with photos, and will have web access to the educational modules through their portal. Every month, participants will receive a text encouraging them to visit their portals. In contrast to Arm 1, they will receive their weekly performance results by text to their phone with tailored feedback. In Arm 2, subjects will receive a larger incentive if they perform their desired treatment behavior. Incentive notification will be texted to participants. Similarly to Arm 1, parents/legal guardians will have access to the same educational materials via their own WTH portals. Additionally, to mitigate the minimal risk of this study, parents/legal guardians will be notified if their child is excessively non-adherent.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of behavioral feedback plus economic incentives to promote treatment adherence among a large diverse population of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with kidney transplants (KT) or spina bifida (SB). In Arm 2, participants will receive personalized feedback, and an "extra" incentive of $10 for meeting their adherence goal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percentage of Subjects With Adherence Behavior Greater Than or Equal to 85% From Baseline and Intervention Period (6-month)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Participants who do not submit the correct number of pictures within the prescribed window of their expected time due for treatment will be counted as non-adherent for that episode of med taking/cathing. The mean percentage of participants who achieved 85% adherence was calculated for each week from baseline (week 1) to the end of the 6 month time point (week 26).
baseline to 6 months
Study Efficacy of Use of Way to Health Portal System
Time Frame: 12.5 months
Statistical analysis of the number and timing of messages sent to the Way to Health portal as well as how often the participants used the portal will determine study efficacy.
12.5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pressure Per Unit Volume of Bladder of Spina Bifida Subjects
Time Frame: 12.5 months
Urodynamic studies (UDS) in spina bifida subjects will test the change in bladder wall compliance, i.e. the change in pressure per unit volume of the bladder.
12.5 months
Change in Coefficient of Variation (CV) of Immunosuppressive Drug Levels (Tacrolimus or Sirolimus) Between the Baseline (run-in) and Intervention Period.
Time Frame: baseline and at 6 months
The difference between the coefficient of variation (CV) of immunosuppressive drug levels in kidney transplant patients at baseline and intervention period (6 months). CV was calculated using the average of three values of immunosuppressive drug levels at each time point. The change was calculated as the difference in mean value between baseline and 6 months.
baseline and at 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Executive Function
Time Frame: 12.5 months
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function questionnaire will be administered and answers will be analyzed.
12.5 months
Perceived Treatment Barriers - Spina Bifida
Time Frame: 12.5 months
The Spina Bifida and Cathing Barriers measure will be administered and answers will be analyzed.
12.5 months
Treatment Responsibility
Time Frame: 12.5 months
Allocation of Treatment Responsibility and the Sharing of Spina Bifida Management Responsibilities surveys will be administered and answers will be analyzed.
12.5 months
Mean Change in Perceived Adherence Behaviors as Measured by the Adolescent Medication Barriers Scale From Baseline to Intervention Period (6 Months)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
The Adolescent Medication Barrier Scale will be administered to the kidney transplant patients and answers will be analyzed. The Adolescent Medication Barriers Scale (AMBS) endorsement score is the sum of 17 items (rated 1,2,3=0, rated 4 & 5=1). The higher the endorsement score (range of 0-17) indicates that the adolescent perceived themselves as having more barriers to medication adherence.
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Self-Efficacy Score From Baseline to Intervention Period (6 Month)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). Total score is the mean of the 6-tems. The higher the score, the more self-efficacy. The outcome measure is the change in score 6 months-baseline.
baseline to 6 months
Change in Disease Knowledge Score From Baseline to Intervention (6 Months)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
The Heart Transplant Knowledge questionnaire, adapted for Kidney Transplant patients, and the Knowledge of Spina Bifida survey will be administered and answers will be analyzed. There are 20 questions, each correct question = 1, each incorrect question =0. The total score ranges from 0-20. The higher the score, the more knowledge the participant has. The outcome measure will measure the change in score from 6 months to baseline.
baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

February 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-013000
  • 1R01DK110749 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will not share individual participant data beyond those involved in the research study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spina Bifida

Clinical Trials on Behavioral Feedback and Economic Incentives: Arm 1

Subscribe