A Family-centered Intervention for Acutely-ill Persons With Dementia

May 9, 2024 updated by: Marie Boltz, Penn State University

Reducing Disability Via a Family-centered Intervention for Acutely-ill Persons With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

This study will address the effectiveness of Family-centered Function Focused Care (Fam-FFC). Fam-FFC is a theoretically-based approach to care in which family caregivers partner with nurses to prevent functional decline and other complications related to hospitalization in older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. A systematic care pathway promotes information-sharing and decision-making that promotes physical activity, function, and cognitive stimulation during the hospitalization and immediate post-acute period. Our goal in this work is to establish a practical and effective way to optimize function and physical activity; decrease neuropsychiatric symptoms, delirium, and depression; prevent avoidable post-acute care dependency; and prevent unnecessary rehospitalizations and long-stay nursing home admissions, while mitigating family caregiver strain and burden.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Older persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are about two times as likely to be hospitalized as their peers who are cognitively healthy. The care of hospitalized persons with ADRD has traditionally focused on the acute medical problem that led to admission with little attention paid to functional recovery. Older persons with ADRD are at greater risk for functional decline and increased care dependency after discharge due to a combination of intrinsic factors, environmental, policy, and care practices that restrict physical and cognitive activity, and limited staff knowledge of dementia care. Family caregivers (CGs) can play an important role in promoting the functional recovery of hospitalized older adults. They can provide vital information, offer motivation and support of function-focused care, and assume responsibility in varying degrees for post-acute care delivery and coordination. Family-centered FFC (Fam-FFC) incorporates an educational empowerment model for family CGs provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery. In this patient/family-centered care approach, nurses purposefully engage family CGs in the assessment, decision-making, care delivery and evaluation of function-focused care during hospitalization and the 60-day post-acute period. In the proposed project, we will implement Fam-FFC in a cluster randomized trial of 438 patient/CG dyads in six hospital units randomized within three hospitals (73 dyads per unit) to accomplish the following aims: Aim 1: Validate the efficacy of Fam-FFC on physical function (ADLs/ performance and physical activity), delirium occurrence and severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and mood; Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of Fam-FFC on family CG-centered outcomes (preparedness for caregiving, strain, burden, and desire to institutionalize); and Aim 3: Evaluate the relative costs for Fam-FFC v. control condition, and calculate health care cost (post-acute health care utilization) and total cost savings for Fam-FFC. We will also evaluate the cultural appropriateness of Fam-FCC for diverse families in our sample. Dyads will be composed of community-residing, hospitalized medical patients with very mild to moderate dementia (0.5 to 2.0 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale) and their CG (defined as the primary person providing oversight and support on an ongoing basis). Outcomes will be evaluated at hospital admission, within 72 hours of discharge, and two and six months post-discharge. This study will be a critical next step in delineating how to partner with family CGs to change acute care approaches provided to patients with ADRD so as to optimize function after discharge, and promote delirium abatement and well-being in these individuals. The societal implications of helping older individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias avoid functional decline are enormous in terms of aging in place, quality of life, cost, and caregiver burden. The study findings will be relevant for other areas of behavior change research in acute care, specifically those related to engaging patients and families in health care planning, delivery, and evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

461

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17602
        • Lancaster General Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Presbyterian Medical Center
      • West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States, 19380
        • Chester County Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Patient Inclusion Criteria: medical patients who: are age ≥65, speak English or Spanish, live in the community prior to admission to the hospital, screen positive for dementia on well-validated scales (Montreal Cognitive Assessment {MoCA} ≤ 25 123-127 and AD8 >2 128,129), and score 0.5 to 2.0 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; and have a family CG as the designated study partner for the duration of the study.

Patient Exclusion Criteria: mild cognitive impairment (CDR 0.5 without functional or ADL impairments), severe dementia (CDR 3), any significant neurological condition associated with cognitive impairment other than dementia (e.g. brain tumor), a major acute psychiatric disorder, have no family caregiver to participate, are enrolled in hospice and/or have a life expectancy of six months or less, are admitted from a nursing home, or experience transfers to another unit for stays longer than 48 hours.

Family Inclusion Criteria: age 18 and above whose relatives meet inclusion criteria will be eligible if they can speak and read English or Spanish; and are related to the patient by blood, marriage, adoption, or affinity as a significant other (defined as or by the patient/legally authorized person as the primary person providing oversight and support on an ongoing basis); participate, at a minimum, in the initial assessment and development of FamPath; and able to recall at least two words on the MiniCog

Staff nurses (at the conclusion of the intervention at each site) who identify the intervention unit as the primary unit worked, and speak English or Spanish, will be included in focus groups

For the exploratory aim of assessing the cultural appropriateness of the intervention, we will recruit family caregivers who self-identify as black, Latino, Asian and white, randomly selected from the Fam-FFC sample. Approximately 10 percent of families from each ethnic group represented in the study will be approached for consent for participation in interviews. (If theoretical saturation is not reached, interviews will continue until saturation is reached). Additionally, the six nurse champions will be consented and interviewed after the study ends in his/her particular unit/setting to provide their perspective on the cultural appropriateness of Fam-FFC.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fam-FFC
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
No Intervention: Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Time Frame: Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Preparedness
Time Frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicating greater perceived preparedness.
Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delirium Severity
Time Frame: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method Short Form with scores ranging from 0-7 and higher scores indicating more delirium severity.
Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Behavior
Time Frame: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed by the Brief Neuropsychiatric Inventory with scores ranging from 0 to 36 and higher scores indicating greater behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Actigraphy data, measured by the MotionWatch 8, includes minutes spent in moderate activity.
admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Depression
Time Frame: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia with total scores ranging between 0 to 38 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Strain
Time Frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Assessed by the Modified Caregiver Strain Index with total scores ranging from 0 to 26 and higher scores indicating greater caregiver strain.
Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
Caregiver Burden
Time Frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
Assessed using the Short Form Zarit Burden Interview with total scores total scores ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of caregiver burden.
Discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
Caregiver Anxiety
Time Frame: Discharge and 2 and 6 months
Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression subscale with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating greater levels of caregiver anxiety.
Discharge and 2 and 6 months
Falls
Time Frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
Number of falls a week after hospital discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
discharge and 2 and 6 months
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
Number of hospitalizations within a week after discharge; number of hospitalizations between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of hospitalizations between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
discharge and 2 and 6 months
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
Time Frame: discharge and 2 and 6 months
Number of ER visits within a week after discharge; number of ER visits between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of ER visits between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
discharge and 2 and 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Care Cost
Time Frame: end of intervention at each study site, 12 months after enrollment initiated
cost equals staff and research nurse time (hours worked and training time) to conduct intervention.
end of intervention at each study site, 12 months after enrollment initiated

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie Boltz, PhD, Penn State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

February 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC)

Subscribe