Feeding Malnourished Children Different Types of Fatty Acids to Promote Neurocognitive Development

Improved Polyunsaturated Ready-to-use Therapeutic Food for Improved Neurocognitive Outcomes in Severe Acute Malnutrition

An appropriate balance of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids is important for support of neurocognitive development in healthy infants and toddlers. In young children recovering from severe acute malnutrition (SAM), excess omega-6 intake depletes omega-3 fatty acid status. This research will evaluate how novel ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) with balanced fatty acids improve the metabolic and neurocognitive effects in young children in Malawi recovering from SAM, yielding new knowledge that also has implications for development of well-nourished children.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2897

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Blantyre, Malawi
        • University of Malawi College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 4 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 6-59 months
  • An acceptable appetite defined by the ability to consume 30 grams RUTF within 20 minutes
  • Mid Upper Arm Circumference <11.5 cm, weight-for-height z-score < -3, or bilateral pitting edema on the dorsum of the feet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in any other ongoing study or supplementary feeding program
  • Children with a chronic medical condition, including cerebral palsy, static encephalopathy, congenital heart disease, gastrointestinal disease, or peanut allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional RUTF (S-RUTF)
This is the control group for the study, which will receive the international standard of care therapeutic food. S-RUTF is made with conventional peanuts, which are inherently high in omega-6 linoleic acid.
All patients with severe acute malnutrition will receive a course of amoxicillin.
Other Names:
  • Amoxil
S-RUTF: Milk, canola oil, palm oil, white sugar, standard peanuts
EXPERIMENTAL: High oleic RUTF (HO-RUTF)
The treatment provided to children randomized to this arm of the study includes nutritional content comparable to S-RUTF with the exception of a low lineoleic acid/high oleic acid ratio formulated with high oleic content peanuts.
All patients with severe acute malnutrition will receive a course of amoxicillin.
Other Names:
  • Amoxil
HO-RUTF: Milk, perilla oil, palm oil, white sugar, high oleic peanuts
EXPERIMENTAL: DHA-supplemented HO-RUTF (D-HO-RUTF)
The treatment provided to children randomized to this arm of the study mirrors that provided by HO-RUTF with that addition of supplemental DHA at a level higher than attainable with optimal precursors.
All patients with severe acute malnutrition will receive a course of amoxicillin.
Other Names:
  • Amoxil
D-HO-RUTF: DHA, milk, perilla oil, palm oil, white sugar, high oleic peanuts

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurocognitive outcome
Time Frame: Time Frame: 4 to 7 months after nutritional outcome

Measured by score on the Malawian Developmental Assessment Test (MDAT). The scale is continuous and interval in nature, the range varies by population

  • The scale title is "Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool z-score"
  • The primary outcome is Global z-score, titled "Global z-sore"
  • Secondary outcomes are 4 sub-domain z-scores are titled "Gross motor z-score", "Fine motor z-score", Language z-score", and "Social z-score"
Time Frame: 4 to 7 months after nutritional outcome
Neurocognitive outcome
Time Frame: Time Frame: within 4 weeks after nutritional outcome

Defined by Willatts intention score adapted for field training, 3 problems to be tested. The scale is ordinal in nature, with higher values indicated better scores

  • The scale title is "Intention Score"
  • Problem 1 is scored 0 - 4
  • Problem 2 is scored 0 - 4
  • Problem 3 is scored 0 - 8
Time Frame: within 4 weeks after nutritional outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nutritional recovery
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks following enrollment
Defined by resolution of edema AND mid-upper arm circumference [MUAC] >12.4cm, AND/OR a weight/height z-score [WHZ] >-3
Up to 12 weeks following enrollment
Attentional orienting speed
Time Frame: 4-7 months after nutritional after nutritional outcome
Measured by mean saccade latency to peripheral targets
4-7 months after nutritional after nutritional outcome
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Fortnightly follow up visits up to 12 weeks following enrollment
Measured by number of days diarrhea and/or rashes.
Fortnightly follow up visits up to 12 weeks following enrollment
Acceptance of RUTF
Time Frame: Fortnightly follow up visits up to 12 weeks following enrollment
Mother's report of if the child ate the food well. This is a yes or no question.
Fortnightly follow up visits up to 12 weeks following enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mark J Manary, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 2, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification will be indefinitely available within 9 months following article publication through The Washington University Open Scholarship Institutional Repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 9 months of article publication. Data will remain available indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Anyone who wishes to access the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Acute Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Amoxicillin

Subscribe