- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03098797
A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide in Subjects With Barth Syndrome (TAZPOWER)
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Injections of Elamipretide in Subjects With Genetically Confirmed Barth Syndrome Followed by Open-Label Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Genetically confirmed Barth Syndrome
- Male aged 12 and above
At the screening visit, eGFR must meet the following:
- Body weight >30 kg AND eGFR ≥ 90mL/min at screening
- Body weight >40kg AND eGFR ≥60 but <90mL/min/ 1.73m² at screening
- Ambulatory and impaired during the baseline 6MWT
- On stable medication for 30 days prior to the baseline visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participated in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days of or is currently enrolled in a non-interventional clinical trial at the baseline visit potentially confounding with this trial
- Prior or current medical condition that would prevent the subject from safely participating in the trial
- Undergone any inpatient hospitalizations within 30 days of the baseline visit
- Is undergoing an apparent pubertal growth spurt
- Has uncontrolled hypertension
- History of substance abused within the year before the baseline visit or is likely to be uncompliant
- History of heart transplantation or current placement on the waiting list for a heart transplant
- For subjects with an ICD: known occurrence of ICD discharge in the 3 months prior to the baseline visit
- For subjects without an ICD: expected to undergo an implantation of an ICD during the conduct of the study
- Currently receiving treatment with chemotherapeutic agents or immunosuppressant agents or has received prior radiation therapy to the chest
- Recipient of stem cell or gene therapy or is currently being treated by a therapeutic investigational device
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Elamipretide, then Placebo
Experimental Part 1: 12 weeks of single daily SC doses of 40 mg elamipretide in Treatment Period 1 followed by 12 weeks of treatment with placebo in Treatment Period 2 (separated by a 4 week washout period). Experimental Open Label Extension Part 2: All subjects will receive Elamipretide 40mg SC daily injections for up to 168 weeks |
40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other Names:
daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo , then Elamipretide
Placebo Comparator Part 1: 12 weeks of single daily SC doses of placebo in Treatment Period 1 followed by 12 weeks of treatment with 40 mg elamipretide in Treatment Period 2 (separated by a 4 week washout period). Placebo Comparator Open Label Extension Part 2: All subjects will receive Elamipretide 40mg SC daily injections for up to 168 weeks |
40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other Names:
daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by Visit
Time Frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
Average distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at end of treatment, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
|
Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)
|
Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit at predose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment).
The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0 to 4-point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome.
Combined Min score=0, max score =12.
Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods.
Results from each 12-week period were combined, where end of treatment for Period 1 =Visit 5 (week 12), and End of Period 2 = Visit 10 (week 12)
|
Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWT
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
|
Change from baseline for distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
Change from Baseline (mean) in Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit.
The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0-4 point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects by visit; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome.
Change from baseline: an increase in scores would mean worse outcome, a decrease in scores means better outcome.
Combined Min score=-12, max score =12.
Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods.
Baseline= Period 1 Predose.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
|
Part 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by Visit
Time Frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.
|
Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
|
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons.
Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.
Change from baseline where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose: the greater positive change, the better the outcome, the smaller positive change (or negative change) the number the worse the outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
|
|
Part 1: 5XSST by Visit
Time Frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
Time (in seconds) to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
|
Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
|
Change in baseline in time (in seconds), where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand by visit.
More time means worse outcome, less time means better outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192
|
|
Part 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by Visit
Time Frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
SWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability from Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment), where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
|
Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
|
Change from Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment,where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-doseSWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability.
An increase from baseline is a better outcome and a decrease in score is a worse outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
|
|
Part 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Week 1, Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
Patient-reported health status over the past week, by visit, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults.
PGI Scale is as follows: 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, and 4=Very Severe.
Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
|
Pre-dose, Week 1, Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
Part 2: Change from Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit Patient-reported health status over the past week where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults.
PGI Scale is as follows: 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very Severe.
Change from baseline: Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
|
Part 1: Part 1: Clinician Global Impression
Time Frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
Clinician Global Impression Scale by visit: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults.
PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse.
Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
End of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
|
Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
|
|
Part 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
Change from Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose.
Clinician Global Impression Scale: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults.
PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse.
Change from baseline: higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
|
Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hilary Vernon, MD, PhD, McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Heart Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Metabolic Diseases
- Disease
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Genetic Diseases, X-Linked
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Heart Defects, Congenital
- Cardiovascular Abnormalities
- Abnormalities, Multiple
- Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Syndrome
- Barth Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPIBA-201
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Barth Syndrome
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.Not yet recruitingBarth SyndromeUnited Kingdom, United States
-
Duke UniversityUniversity of FloridaCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedBarth Syndrome
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.AvailableMitochondrial Diseases | Barth Syndrome
-
X4 PharmaceuticalsRecruitingNeutropeniaUnited States, France, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Romania, Hungary, Israel, Greece, Australia, Serbia, Czechia, Georgia, Argentina, Portugal, Ukraine, Canada, Switzerland, Malaysia, Turkey (Türkiye), Colombia, India
-
LMU KlinikumUniversity of Pisa; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; European...RecruitingMitochondrial Diseases | MDS | Mitochondrial Myopathies | MELAS Syndrome | MIDD | Kearns-Sayre Syndrome | MERRF Syndrome | Barth Syndrome | Leigh Syndrome | MNGIE | LHON | Pearson Syndrome | NARP Syndrome | Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency | SANDO | SCAE | MIRAS | CPEOAustria, Germany, Italy
-
Jerry Vockley, MD, PhDUltragenyx Pharmaceutical IncNo longer availableBarth Syndrome | Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein Deficiency | Very Long-chain acylCoA Dehydrogenase (VLCAD) Deficiency | Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase Deficiencies (CPT1, CPT2) | Long-chain Hydroxyacyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency | Glycogen Storage Disorders | Pyruvate Carboxylase Deficiency... and other conditionsUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineNot yet recruiting
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingMicrodeletion 3q29 Syndrome | Microduplication 3q29 SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Elamipretide
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.CompletedAge-related Macular DegenerationUnited States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.CompletedSkeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the ElderlyUnited States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.CompletedMitochondrial MyopathyUnited States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.TerminatedPrimary Mitochondrial DiseaseUnited States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.CompletedHeart FailureSpain, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Serbia, France, Latvia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Poland
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.CompletedPrimary Mitochondrial DiseaseUnited States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.Charite University, Berlin, Germany; SCIRENT Clinical Research and Science...Completed
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.Not yet recruitingBarth SyndromeUnited Kingdom, United States
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.Active, not recruitingAge Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD)United States, New Zealand, Hungary, Spain, Italy, Germany, Czechia, United Kingdom
-
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.TerminatedPrimary Mitochondrial MyopathyUnited States, Germany, Canada, Italy, United Kingdom, Denmark, Hungary