Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Improving Well-Being in Patients With Stage III-IV Cancer and Their Partners

April 7, 2021 updated by: Sharon Manne, PhD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Couple-Focused ACT Intervention for Couples Coping With Cancer: A Pilot Study

This pilot clinical trial studies how well acceptance and commitment therapy works in improving well-being in patients with stage III-IV cancer and their partners. Learning how to accept negative thoughts and feelings and how to live in the present without worrying about the future or past may improve coping skills in patients with stage III-IV cancer and their partners.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To examine the feasibility and acceptability of couples' acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) (C-ACT).

II. To collect pilot data on the impact of C-ACT on patients' and partners' anxiety, depression, and quality of life.

OUTLINE:

Patients and their partners attend 6 weekly ACT sessions over 60-75 minutes. Couples learn skills of acceptance, avoidance, awareness, values and committed action, mindfulness and values in relationships, and handling persistent worries and concerns. Patients and their partners also do homework assignment after each session.

After completion of the study, patients and their partners are followed up at 1 week.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 breast, cervical, colorectal, endometrial, hepatobiliary, lung, melanoma, gynecological, prostate cancer in the past six months
  • Married or cohabiting with a significant other of either gender for more than one year
  • At the time of recruitment, a life expectancy of greater than 6 months and/or a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above or an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1
  • English speaking
  • No significant hearing impairment that would prevent participation in sessions
  • Live within a 1 hour commuting distance from Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Partner cannot have cancer diagnosis (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) and be currently receiving treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Supportive Care (ACT)
Patients and their partners attend 6 weekly ACT sessions over 60-75 minutes. Couples learn skills of acceptance, avoidance, awareness, values and committed action, mindfulness and values in relationships, and handling persistent worries and concerns. Patients and their partners also do homework assignment after each session.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo ACT
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CBT
  • cognitive therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in acceptance as measured by the COPE acceptance subscale
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Pre-post changes will be examined using t-tests in the primary outcomes as well as the mechanisms of change (e.g., flexibility, avoidance self-disclosure). Because this is primarily a pilot and feasibility study and not an efficacy test, these data will be used primarily to examine whether an impact on distress and well-being was made but statistical significance will not be the primary aim.
Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Change in avoidance as measured by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Pre-post changes will be examined using t-tests in the primary outcomes as well as the mechanisms of change (e.g., flexibility, avoidance self-disclosure). Because this is primarily a pilot and feasibility study and not an efficacy test, these data will be used primarily to examine whether an impact on distress and well-being was made but statistical significance will not be the primary aim.
Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Change in value based living as measured by the Valued Living questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Pre-post changes will be examined using t-tests in the primary outcomes as well as the mechanisms of change (e.g., flexibility, avoidance self-disclosure). Because this is primarily a pilot and feasibility study and not an efficacy test, these data will be used primarily to examine whether an impact on distress and well-being was made but statistical significance will not be the primary aim.
Baseline to 1-week post intervention
Feasibility defined as acceptance
Time Frame: Up to 1-week post intervention
This trial will be considered feasible if the acceptance rate among eligible patients is equal to or greater than 30%
Up to 1-week post intervention
Feasibility defined as session drop out
Time Frame: Up to 1-week post intervention
This trial will be considered feasible if drop out from sessions (at any point over the 6 sessions) is less than 20% (thus, 6/30)
Up to 1-week post intervention
Feasibility defined as survey follow ups
Time Frame: Up to 1-week post intervention
This trial will be considered feasible if 3) completion of study surveys at the follow up is 80%, and patients are not lost to progressive disease.
Up to 1-week post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 6, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IV Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

Subscribe