HIP Mobile: A Community-based Monitoring, Rehabilitation and Learning e-System for Patients Following a Fracture

Approximately 30,000 adults in Quebec over the age of 50 suffer a fragility fracture each year. Fractures can affect a person's health, well-being and autonomy. Personal costs of these fractures are high, with as many as 50% of hip fracture patients being unable to return their pre-fracture level of autonomy.

Homecare and community services provide customary rehabilitation support immediately following discharge from acute-care, though this contribution can be limited by lack of resources. For those patients at risk of negative outcomes, we have demonstrated clinically important benefits of extended exercise rehabilitation programs offered beyond the regular rehabilitation period on improving physical function.

Through advances in sensor and telecommunication technology, eHealth solutions incorporated within homecare services as an integral part of the continuum of care can lead to better patient and health professional experience, improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs to the healthcare system.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the implementation of a 3-month community-based extended-rehabilitation e-Monitoring and Coaching support program is more effective at improving mobility in community-dwelling elderly patients who have sustained a fracture than a printed material support program, and if these effects persist 6 months after discontinuation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Jewish General Hospital
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1M5
        • St. Mary's Hospital Center
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
        • McGill University Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community dwelling men and women aged ≥ 60 years
  • Treated for any fracture excluding hands, feet, patella, cervical spine, skull, ribs, or clavicle, at any of the 3 participating sites, within the previous 8 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper limb fractures that do not meet the criteria of gait frailty
  • Multiple traumas
  • Open fractures
  • Pathological fractures
  • Inability to communicate adequately in either French or English
  • Inability to give written informed consent
  • Discharge to a long-term care institution

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Workbook support group
Printed educational workbook and pedometer.
Printed material support
Experimental: HIP Mobile e-Monitoring support group
Remote monitoring via smart shoe insoles and a coaching with enabling educational electronic program accessed through a tablet.
3-month community-based extended-rehabilitation e-Monitoring and Coaching support program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mobility
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Measured as an ordinal mobility response variable quantified by the number of minimal clinically important changes (MIC) a participant attains using the gait speed and 30 second Sit to Stand tests. A person making no MIC in either measure is given a response category of 0, the lowest. A person changing by 1 MIC on only of the measures (either one) will be given a value of 1; a MIC gain on both measures would be assigned a value of 2, and so forth.
0, 1, 3, and 7 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in grip strength
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Measured using a Jamar™ hand dynamometer.
0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Change in walking endurance
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Measured using the 2-minute walk test.
0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Change in balance
Time Frame: 0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Measured using the Berg Balance Scale.
0, 1, 3, and 7 months
Change in the spatial area an individual moves through
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured using the Life Space Mobility Assessment
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in global function status
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI)
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in perceived physical health status
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the physical function subscale of the RAND-36
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the EQ-5D
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in patient-reported health perception
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the How Are You Today? Visual Analog Health States
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in goal directed behavior
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in global quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by Patient Generated Index (PGI)
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in cognition
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ)
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Change in confidence in maintaining balance while doing daily activities.
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months
Measured by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-S)
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne Morin, MD, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-248-MUHC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Workbook support

Subscribe