- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03154359
Atomoxetine PBPK-PD Clinical Study
August 1, 2023 updated by: Steve Leeder, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
An Open-Label, Single- and Multi-Dose Study to Evaluate the Relationship Between the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Outcomes of Atomoxetine in CYP2D6 Extensive, Intermediate and Poor Metabolizers in Children With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
The primary aims of this study focus on characterizing the relationship between atomoxetine exposure and clinical outcomes, as assessed by standardized measures.
We will also simultaneously monitor side effect of atomoxetine, another measure of clinical outcomes, and categorize study participants on their ability to tolerate atomoxetine.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Atomoxetine (ATX), Strattera®, is a norepinephrine re-uptake transporter inhibitor that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
The drug is often considered a second- or third-line agent, due to the perception that the drug does not work very well.
In fact, in a review of studies submitted to the FDA, it reported that there appeared to be discrete classes of response to atomoxetine.
After 6-9 weeks of treatment, 47% of the patients were considered "responders" based on changes in the rating scales used to measure ADHD symptoms whereas 40% of patients were considered non-responders.
Statistically significant (p<0.001)
differences in scores between responders and non-responders were apparent after the first week of treatment.
At the relatively low starting doses of the titration scheme, this suggests that there may be a subgroup of patents who are particularly responsive to ATX.
We hypothesize that there could be two reasons for this: 1) variability in drug pharmacokinetics (i.e., inadequate drug concentrations in the blood over time could lead to poor response) and 2) variability in drug pharmacodynamics (i.e.
differences at the level of the target of drug action that limit the response to a drug, regardless of concentration of drug present in the blood).
The CYP2D6 gene, which encodes for the drug metabolizing enzyme CYP2D6, is responsible for the clearance of ATX from the body, is highly polymorphic.
ATX metabolism by CYP2D6 protein is one of the major routes of clearance (i.e., removal) of this drug.
Genetic variability in the CYP2D6 gene leads to wide inter-individual variability in the activity of the enzyme, ultimately resulting in differing amount of drug in the body (also referred to as "exposure," and is a component of drug pharmacokinetics).
Secondly, the SLC6A2 gene which encodes for the norepinephrine reuptake transporter, the drug target for ATX, is also subject to genetic variation.
Reported genetic variants of SLC6A2 have been associated with decreased abundance of the transporter.
The consequences of SLC6A2 genetic variation with regards to ATX clinical response are currently unknown.
In the context of distinct "responder" and "non-responder" groups with a population of atomoxetine-treated patients, non-response could be due to definable differences at the level of the drug target (patients unlikely to respond regardless of the ATX concentrations achieved), or simply a consequence of inadequate exposure in a substantial proportion of population.
The goal of this study is to address this issue.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
51
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
- Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
4 years to 16 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Males and females 6-18 years of age, with a diagnosis of ADHD.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:• Males and females 6-18 years of age at the time of enrollment
- Diagnosis of ADHD, as confirmed by a Study Physician at intake visit.
- Intention of the Study Physician to begin therapy with ATX at intake visit
- Willing to provide written permission/assent to participate
ADHD Medication Status is one of the following:
- ADHD medication naïve or not currently taking ADHD medication including stimulants, α2-agonists, and ATX, or
- Currently taking a stimulant for ADHD and is willing to wash out of stimulants prior to starting ATX. This washout is also approved by a Study Physician, or other qualified study personnel (see Section 11.0 for Procedures Involved).
Exclusion Criteria:
- An IQ < 70
- A diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Inability or unwillingness to have blood drawn as described in the protocol schedule of events and consent
- Underlying risk for cardiotoxicity, such as presentation of structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, or arrhythmias
- Clinically significant abnormal safety laboratory values as determined by treating physician
- Diagnosis that may cause abnormal absorption or gastric emptying, such as reflux, inflammatory bowel disease, or Crohn's disease
- For females, a positive urine pregnancy test
- Previous history of adverse drug reaction to ATX
Use of drugs known to inhibit CYP2D6:
- Concurrent therapy with sertraline, venlafaxine, imipramine, nortriptyline, quinidine, propafenone, cimetidine, tamoxifen, bupropion, over-the-counter medications containing diphenhydramine, codeine, tramadol, hydrocodone, or oxycodone
- Concurrent or previous therapy with fluoxetine or paroxetine in the last 2 months
- Concurrent or previous therapy with terbinafine in the last 6 months
- Unwillingness or inability to washout of stimulant ADHD medications
- Concurrent or recent use of other psychiatric/behavioral health drugs including SSRIs, SNRIs, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, anti-epileptics, and α2-agonists that would impact the participant's pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic baseline
- Subject is considered by PI to be unsuitable for participation in the study for any reason
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders to Intervention
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Classification of participants as "responders" versus "non-responders" is based on percent reduction in total National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (3rd edition) score from baseline.
Participants with ≥40% reduction in total score from baseline are classified as responders.
The scale assesses the presence and severity of 18 DSM-V criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms.
Symptoms are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale: 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Very Often").
Maximum total symptom score is 54.The measure includes 8 questions assessing functional impairment ("Performance").
Impairment is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale: 1 ("Excellent") to 5 ("Problematic").
|
6 weeks
|
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders to Intervention
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Classification of participants as "responders" versus "non-responders" is based on percent reduction in total National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (3rd edition) score from baseline.
Participants with ≥40% reduction in total score from baseline are classified as responders.
The scale assesses the presence and severity of 18 DSM-V criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms.
Symptoms are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale: 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Very Often").
Maximum total symptom score is 54.The measure includes 8 questions assessing functional impairment ("Performance").
Impairment is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale: 1 ("Excellent") to 5 ("Problematic").
|
18 weeks
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: Baseline (first dose)
|
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured over a 12-hour period following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at baseline (first dose).
Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
Baseline (first dose)
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at 6 weeks.
Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
6 weeks
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at 18 weeks.
Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
18 weeks
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: Baseline (first dose)
|
AUC is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve following administration of atomoxetine.
For the baseline pharmacokinetic study (first dose of atomoxetine) plasma concentrations were measured at 17 timepoints between 0 and 72 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 48, and 72 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) after dose administration for all other participants.
The AUC was generated using a mixed log-linear approach and extrapolated to infinity.
AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
Baseline (first dose)
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
For the steady-state pharmacokinetic studies at 6 weeks, plasma concentrations were measured at 15 timepoints between 0 and 24 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and at 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) and extrapolated to 24 hours for all other participants.
AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
6 weeks
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
For the steady-state pharmacokinetic studies at 18 weeks, plasma concentrations were measured at 15 timepoints between 0 and 24 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and at 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) and extrapolated to 24 hours for all other participants.
AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
|
18 weeks
|
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action.
DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons).
To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, absolute baseline and pre-dose concentrations of DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
|
Baseline
|
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action.
DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons).
To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, pre-dose concentration of DHPG at the 6-week pharmacokinetic study visit will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
|
6 weeks
|
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action.
DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons).
To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, pre-dose concentration of DHPG at the 18-week pharmacokinetic study visit will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
|
18 weeks
|
Change in Plasma Concentration of DHPG From Baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The change in DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
|
6 weeks
|
Change in Plasma Concentration of DHPG From Baseline
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
The change in DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
|
18 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James S Leeder, PharmD, PhD, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gaedigk A, Simon SD, Pearce RE, Bradford LD, Kennedy MJ, Leeder JS. The CYP2D6 activity score: translating genotype information into a qualitative measure of phenotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;83(2):234-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100406. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
- Newcorn JH, Sutton VK, Weiss MD, Sumner CR. Clinical responses to atomoxetine in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 May;48(5):511-518. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c55b2.
- Seneca N, Gulyas B, Varrone A, Schou M, Airaksinen A, Tauscher J, Vandenhende F, Kielbasa W, Farde L, Innis RB, Halldin C. Atomoxetine occupies the norepinephrine transporter in a dose-dependent fashion: a PET study in nonhuman primate brain using (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Sep;188(1):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0483-3. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
- Michelson D, Read HA, Ruff DD, Witcher J, Zhang S, McCracken J. CYP2D6 and clinical response to atomoxetine in children and adolescents with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;46(2):242-51. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000246056.83791.b6.
- Kim CH, Hahn MK, Joung Y, Anderson SL, Steele AH, Mazei-Robinson MS, Gizer I, Teicher MH, Cohen BM, Robertson D, Waldman ID, Blakely RD, Kim KS. A polymorphism in the norepinephrine transporter gene alters promoter activity and is associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):19164-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510836103. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
- Gaedigk A, Twist GP, Leeder JS. CYP2D6, SULT1A1 and UGT2B17 copy number variation: quantitative detection by multiplex PCR. Pharmacogenomics. 2012 Jan;13(1):91-111. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.135. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
- Gaedigk A, Ndjountche L, Divakaran K, Dianne Bradford L, Zineh I, Oberlander TF, Brousseau DC, McCarver DG, Johnson JA, Alander SW, Wayne Riggs K, Steven Leeder J. Cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) gene locus heterogeneity: characterization of gene duplication events. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb;81(2):242-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100033.
- Gaedigk A, Jaime LK, Bertino JS Jr, Berard A, Pratt VM, Bradfordand LD, Leeder JS. Identification of Novel CYP2D7-2D6 Hybrids: Non-Functional and Functional Variants. Front Pharmacol. 2010 Oct 4;1:121. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2010.00121. eCollection 2010.
- Gaedigk A, Fuhr U, Johnson C, Berard LA, Bradford D, Leeder JS. CYP2D7-2D6 hybrid tandems: identification of novel CYP2D6 duplication arrangements and implications for phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics. 2010 Jan;11(1):43-53. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.133.
- Gaedigk A. Complexities of CYP2D6 gene analysis and interpretation. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;25(5):534-53. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.825581.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 12, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
June 16, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 12, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
May 16, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 8, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 1, 2023
Last Verified
August 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16100728
- U54HD090258-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on ADHD
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
VIZO Specs LtdRecruiting
-
Loewenstein HospitalWingate InstituteRecruiting
-
Florida State UniversityRecruiting
-
Florida International UniversityRecruiting
-
Region Örebro CountyRecruiting
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityWithdrawn
-
Tris Pharma, Inc.Premier Research Group plcCompleted
Clinical Trials on Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs Hospital; Alesund Hospital; Namsos Hospital; Volvat Medisinsk Senter...Recruiting
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSpain, France, Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAlzheimer DiseaseUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Comorbid Social Anxiety DisorderUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Attention Deficit Disorder With HyperactivityUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderJapan
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderKorea, Republic of
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Oppositional Defiant DisorderAustralia, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Oppositional Defiant DisorderItaly