- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03179631
Long-Term Outcomes of Ataluren in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
February 17, 2026 updated by: PTC Therapeutics
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ataluren in Patients With Nonsense Mutation Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Open-Label Extension
This study is a long-term study of ataluren in participants with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 72-week study, followed by a 72-week open-label period.
The purpose is to characterize the long-term effects of ataluren-mediated dystrophin restoration on disease progression.
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to ataluren or placebo.
Participants will receive blinded study drug three times daily (TID) at morning, midday, and evening for 72 weeks, after which all participants will receive open-label ataluren for an additional 72 weeks (144 weeks in total).
Study assessments will be performed at clinic visits every 12 weeks during the double-blind period and every 24 weeks during the open-label period.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
360
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
South Brisbane, Australia, Q4101
- Queensland Children's Hospital
-
-
New South Wales
-
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
- The Childrens Hospital at Westmead
-
-
Victoria
-
Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
- The Royal Childrens Hospital
-
-
Western Australia
-
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
- Perth Children's Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 30130-100
- Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21.941-912
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000
- Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo - FMUSP
-
-
-
-
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1793
- UMHAT SofiaMed
-
-
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5W9
- Childrens Hospital London Health Sciences Centre
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H8L1
- Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100039
- General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces
-
Fuzhou, China, 350005
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
-
Hunan, China, 410008
- Xiangya Hospital Central South University
-
Shanghai, China, 200032
- Children's Hospital of Fudan University
-
Shenzhen, China, 518038
- Shenzhen Children's Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR
- Queen Mary Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Chandigarh, India, 160012
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
-
New Delhi, India, 110029
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
-
-
Gujarat
-
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 380005
- Panchshil Hospital
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, 560029
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
-
-
Maharashtra
-
Māhīm, Maharashtra, India, 400016
- P.D. Hinduja Hospital
-
-
Tamil Nadu
-
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600006
- Apollo Children's Hospital Chennai
-
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, 632004
- Christian Medical College Hospital Vellore
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500082
- Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS)
-
-
West Bengal
-
Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 700054
- Apollo Gleneagles Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Multiple Locations, Japan
- PTC Clinical Site
-
-
-
-
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50586
- Hospital Tunku Azizah Kuala Lumpur
-
Pantai, Malaysia, 59100
- University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC)
-
-
-
-
-
Chihuahua City, Mexico, 31217
- Hospital Angeles Chihuahua
-
Mexico City, Mexico, 04530
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
-
Tlalpan, Mexico, 14389
- Instituto Nacional De Rehabilitacion
-
-
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 02-097
- Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny w Warszawie
-
-
-
-
-
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936-5067
- University of Puerto Rico - School of Medicine
-
-
-
-
-
Moscow, Russia, 125412
- Russian National Research Medical University n.a. N.I.Pirogov, structural branch - Research Clinical Institute of Pediatrics n.a. Academician Yu. E. Veltishchev
-
Saint Petersburg, Russia, 194100
- "Saint Petersburg State Paediatric Medical University" based at Consultative and Diagnostic Centre
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, South Korea, 06351
- Samsung Medical Center
-
Seoul, South Korea, 3080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
Gyeongsangnam-do
-
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea, 50612
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 80756
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
- Siriraj Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34093
- Istanbul University- Instanbul Medical Faculty
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
- Phoenix Childrens Hospital
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
- Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94143
- University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) - Benioff Children's Hospital - Oakland
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
- Stanford University Medical Center
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- University of California (UC) Davis Medical Center
-
San Bernardino, California, United States, 92408
- Loma Linda University Children's Hospital
-
-
Florida
-
Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States, 32561
- Northwest Florida Clinical Research Group, LLC
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University Health - Riley Child Neurology
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- University of Michigan - CS Mott Children's Hospital
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Children's Hospital of Michigan
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
- University of Minnesota
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Shriners Hospital for Children
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
-
-
Texas
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
- Cook Childrens Medical Center
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Texas Children's Hospital
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229-3900
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
- University of Utah
-
-
Virginia
-
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
- Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
- Seattle Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male sex
- Age ≥5 years
- Phenotypic evidence of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
- Nonsense point mutation in the dystrophin gene
- Use of systemic corticosteroids (prednisone/prednisolone or deflazacort)for a minimum of 12 months immediately prior to start of study treatment, with no significant change in dosage or dosing regimen for a minimum of 3 months immediately prior to start of study treatment
- 6MWD ≥150 meters
- Ability to perform timed function tests within 30 seconds
- Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any change in prophylaxis treatment for cardiomyopathy within 1 month prior to start of study treatment.
- Ongoing intravenous (IV) aminoglycoside or IV vancomycin therapy.
- Prior or ongoing therapy with ataluren.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug
- Exposure to another investigational drug within 6 months prior to start of study treatment, or ongoing participation in any interventional clinical trial.
- History of major surgical procedure within 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, or expectation of major surgical procedure during the 72-week placebo-controlled treatment period.
- Requirement for daytime ventilator assistance or any use of invasive mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy.
- Uncontrolled clinical symptoms and signs of congestive heart failure
- Elevated serum creatinine or cystatin C at screening.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ataluren
Participants will receive ataluren oral suspension 10 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening each day for 72 weeks in DB treatment period and for an additional 72 weeks in open-label treatment period.
|
10, 20 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo matched to ataluren oral suspension for 72 weeks in DB treatment period.
After completion of DB treatment period, participants will receive ataluren oral suspension 10 mg/kg in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening each day for 72 weeks in open-label treatment period.
|
10, 20 mg/kg
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at Week 72 - Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline was defined as the maximum measurement of valid Day 1 and Day 2 6MWD values.
Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) was calculated using the mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM).
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 72 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline was defined as the maximum measurement of valid Day 1 and Day 2 6MWD values.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Average Rate of Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline was defined as the maximum measurement of valid Day 1 and Day 2 6MWD values.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Average Rate of Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline was defined as the maximum measurement of valid Day 1 and Day 2 6MWD values.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers [knee-ankle-foot orthoses] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase).
Participants who could not perform a timed function test (TFT) within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers [knee-ankle-foot orthoses ] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase).
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Composite of Average Change From Baseline in TFTs at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The composite TFT was defined as the average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement (average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs) on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Composite of Average Change From Baseline in TFTs at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The composite TFT was defined as the average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement (average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs) on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Composite of Average Rate of Change From Baseline in TFTs at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The composite TFT was defined as the average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement (average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs) on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Composite of Average Rate of Change From Baseline in TFTs at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The composite TFT was defined as the average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement (average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs) on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in 6MWD at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 72
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse compared with baseline.
Participants who did not have 10% 6MWD worsening were censored at the time of the last 6-minute walk test during the DB period.
|
Baseline to Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in 6MWD - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during 6MWD test.
Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse compared with baseline.
Participants who did not have 10% 6MWD worsening were censored at the time of last 6-minute walk test during DB period.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in North Start Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The NSAA total score in the original scale is the sum of scores from 16 activities (excluding head lift).
Each activity was scored as 0 (activity couldn't be performed), 1 (modified method, achieved goal without assistance), or 2 (normal, achieved goal without assistance).
The total score ranges from 0 to 32, where higher scores indicate better functioning.
If fewer than 13 of the 16 activities were performed, the total score was considered missing.
If from 13 to 16 activities were performed, the total score was standardized by (observed total score / number of non-missing activities) x 16.
If an activity could not be performed due to disease progression, a score of 0 was assigned.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Change From Baseline in NSAA Total Score at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 72
|
The NSAA total score in the original scale is the sum of scores from 16 activities (excluding head lift).
Each activity was scored as 0 (activity couldn't be performed), 1 (modified method, achieved goal without assistance), or 2 (normal, achieved goal without assistance).
The total score ranges from 0 to 32, where higher scores indicate better functioning.
If fewer than 13 of the 16 activities were performed, the total score was considered missing.
If from 13 to 16 activities were performed, the total score was standardized by (observed total score / number of non-missing activities) x 16.
If an activity could not be performed due to disease progression, a score of 0 was assigned.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Ambulation - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
Time to loss of ambulation was defined as persistent inability to perform the 10-meter run/walk test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median and 95% CI for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Ambulation Over 72 Weeks - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 72
|
Time to loss of ambulation was defined as persistent inability to perform the 10-meter run/walk test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
|
Baseline up to Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Stair-Climbing - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
Time to loss of stair-climbing was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair climb test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median and 95% CI for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Stair-Climbing - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
Time to loss of stair-climbing was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair climb test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median and 95% CI for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Stair-Descending - mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
Time to loss of stair-descending was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair descend test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median and 95% CI for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Time to Loss of Stair-Descending - ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
Time to loss of stair-descending was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair descend test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
Due to COVID, there were many participants who participated in the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late.
Due to this reason, the calculated median and 95% CI for the time to event for the Ataluren arm in the DB period were greater than Week 72.
|
Baseline up to approximately Week 72 (Due to COVID, many participants attended the protocol-defined Week 72 visit late)
|
|
DB Period: Number of Participants With Function Loss of NSAA Items at Week 72 - mITT Population
Time Frame: Week 72
|
Function loss was defined as a drop of score from 1 or 2 at baseline to a score of 0 at the specified post-baseline of NSAA items.
The missing assessments at post baseline visits were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
|
Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Number of Participants With Function Loss of NSAA Items at Week 72 - ITT Population
Time Frame: Week 72
|
Function loss was defined as a drop of score from 1 or 2 at baseline to a score of 0 at the specified post-baseline of NSAA items.
The missing assessments at post baseline visits were imputed using LOCF.
|
Week 72
|
|
DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 76
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
A TEAE was defined as an AE that occurred or worsened on or after the first dose of study drug and up to 4 weeks after the last dose of double-blind study drug and prior to the first dose of open-label treatment.
A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
|
Baseline up to Week 76
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed.
Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures.
Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.
Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline was defined as the maximum measurement of valid Day 1 and Day 2 6MWD values.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Composite of Average Change From Baseline in TFTs at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
The composite TFT was defined as the average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement (average in times to run/walk 10 meters, climb 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs) on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Run/Walk 10 Meters at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers [knee-ankle-foot orthoses ] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase).
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1.
Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.
Participants who could not perform a TFT within 30 seconds, including those who loss of ambulation or the TFT was above 30 seconds, a value of 30 seconds was used.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using the MMRM.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in NSAA Total Score at Week 144
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 144
|
The NSAA total score in the original scale is the sum of scores from 16 activities (excluding head lift).
Each activity was scored as 0 (activity couldn't be performed), 1 (modified method, achieved goal without assistance), or 2 (normal, achieved goal without assistance).
The total score ranges from 0 to 32, where higher scores indicate better functioning.
If fewer than 13 of the 16 activities were performed, the total score was considered missing.
If from 13 to 16 activities were performed, the total score was standardized by (observed total score / number of non-missing activities) x 16.
If an activity could not be performed due to disease progression, a score of 0 was assigned.
Baseline was defined as the last observed measurement on or prior to the first dose of study drug.
LS mean and SE was calculated using analysis of covariation (ANCOVA) with multiple imputation.
|
Baseline, Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Time to Loss of Ambulation Over 144 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 144
|
Time to loss of ambulation was defined as persistent inability to perform the 10-meter run/walk test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
|
Baseline up to Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Time to Loss of Stair-Climbing Over 144 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 144
|
Time to loss of stair-climbing was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair climb test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
|
Baseline up to Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Time to Loss of Stair- Descending Over 144 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 144
|
Time to loss of stair-descending was defined as persistent inability to perform the 4-stair descend test within 30 seconds at any post-baseline visit and for all remaining visits.
|
Baseline up to Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Function Loss of NSAA Items at Week 144
Time Frame: Week 144
|
Function loss was defined as a drop of score from 1 or 2 at baseline to a score of 0 at the specified post-baseline in NSAA items.
The missing assessments at post baseline visits were imputed using LOCF.
|
Week 144
|
|
Overall Treatment Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 148
|
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
A TEAE was defined as an AE that occurs or worsens on or after the first dose of ataluren (regardless of double-blind or open-label) and up to 4 weeks after the last dose of ataluren.
A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.
|
Baseline up to Week 148
|
|
OL Period: Plasma Pharmacokinetic (PK) Concentration of Ataluren
Time Frame: Predose and 2 hours postdose at Week 144
|
Predose and 2 hours postdose at Week 144
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Vinay Penematsa, MD, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 6, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 5, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
July 25, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 5, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
June 7, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 10, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 17, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PTC124-GD-041-DMD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nervous System Diseases
-
Bracco Diagnostics, IncCompletedCentral Nervous System Neoplasms | Central Nervous System Disease
-
Bracco Diagnostics, IncCompletedCentral Nervous System Diseases | Central Nervous System NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Delve Bio, Inc.Not yet recruiting
-
Bracco Diagnostics, IncCompletedCentral Nervous System Diseases | Central Nervous System NeoplasmsUnited States
-
University of MichiganCompletedAutonomic Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesUnited States
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruitingCentral Nervous System TumorUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineRecruitingCentral Nervous SystemUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors
-
Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI); NRG Oncology; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain and Central Nervous System Tumors
-
University of California, San FranciscoAgenus Inc.CompletedBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ataluren
-
PTC TherapeuticsCompletedDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States, Canada
-
PTC TherapeuticsCystic Fibrosis FoundationCompletedCystic FibrosisUnited States, France, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom
-
PTC TherapeuticsTerminatedNervous System Diseases | Genetic Diseases, Inborn | Genetic Diseases, X-Linked | Musculoskeletal Diseases | Muscular Diseases | Neuromuscular Diseases | Muscular Dystrophies | Muscular Disorders, Atrophic | Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneUnited States, Spain, Korea, Republic of, Belgium, France, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, Israel, Italy, Germany, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Czechia, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey
-
PTC TherapeuticsGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyTerminatedAmino Acid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsFrance, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland
-
PTC TherapeuticsCompletedDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
PTC TherapeuticsGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyTerminatedDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
PTC TherapeuticsGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyTerminatedDuchenne Muscular Dystrophy | Becker Muscular DystrophyUnited States, Belgium, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
-
PTC TherapeuticsCompletedNonsene Mutation Duchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
PTC TherapeuticsCompletedDuchenne Muscular DystrophyUnited States
-
PTC TherapeuticsCompleted