Efficacy of the Buzzy® Device on the Prevention of Health Care Induced Pediatric Pain in a Vaccination Center (DOLVAX)

September 8, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Efficacy of a Cold, Vibration, and Distraction Based Medical Device on the Prevention of Health Care Induced Pediatric Pain: a Comparative, Controlled, Randomized and Multicentric Study

In vaccination centers, venipunctures and vaccinations are sources of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients. Prior painful experiences can reduce the acceptance of later health care, hence making it more difficult for both patients and nurses.

The topical anesthetic cream (lidocaine, prilocaine) and the non-pharmacological (distraction and relaxation) interventions which are usually used for prevention of procedural pain impose certain constraints on families and on vaccination centers.

A distraction and local anesthesia (cold and vibration) based medical device (Buzzy®) could overcome these constraints and could be an interesting alternative for healthcare management in vaccination centers and, in a broader perspective, in other medical services.

Research on this device has been scarce to date. Three of them have shown an efficacy of Buzzy® in comparison to the absence of prevention of vaccination and venipuncture induced pain. An ongoing study will assess the Buzzy® device in comparison to a topical anesthetic cream, but will be set in an emergency department context. To date, no study has compared Buzzy® to topical anesthetic cream on healthy children in a vaccination center.

The research team has formulated the following hypothesis: the Buzzy® device will allow to get a not lower or an equivalent level of pain compared to the level of pain obtained with the usual topical anesthetic cream. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the device Buzzy® on vaccination and venipuncture induced pain in a vaccination center.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85925
        • La Roche sur Yon University Hospital
      • Le Mans, France, 72037
        • Le Mans University Hospital
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Nantes university hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Any child who:

  • requires a venipuncture or a vaccination in a vaccination center
  • is 4 to 15 years old
  • is affiliated to the public social security
  • speaks French or is assisted by an translator in the language of the child
  • has given his oral consent and whose parents have given it

Exclusion Criteria:

Any child who:

  • suffers from sickle cell anemia
  • has a contraindication to use lidocaine patch
  • requires a Bacille de Calmette et Guérin (BCG) vaccine or tuberculin test
  • takes part in another research
  • has already participated to this study for another nursing care.
  • refused to participate or whose parents refused
  • has neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • has a nerve damage or an abrasion of the skin in terms of puncture or injection area.
  • under trusteeship or guardianship (unaccompanied foreign minors).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Buzzy® device
Just before the vaccination or venipuncture the device will be applied on the selected site during 30 seconds and then it will be moved 5 cm above the selected site to make the injection or the puncture. The child will choose if he wants to use the cooling system.
Just before the vaccination or venipuncture the device will be applied on the selected site during 30 seconds and then it will be moved 5 cm above the selected site to make the injection or the puncture. The child will choose if he wants to use the cooling system.
Active Comparator: EMLAPATCH (lidocaine, prilocaine)
The patch will be applied during 1 hour to 1 hour and half before the vaccination or venipuncture, on the selected site. After 1 hour to 1 hour and half, it will be removed and the injection or the puncture will be made on the selected site.
The patch will be applied during 1 hour to 1 hour and half before the vaccination or venipuncture, on the selected site. After 1 hour to 1 hour and half, it will be removed and the injection or the puncture will be made on the selected site.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Faces Pain Scale revised (FPS-r) for children
Time Frame: Day 0
Pain will be assessed by child using the FPS-r. FPS-r is a tool which has been validated and has been shown to be reliable in intercultural children and adolescents population (4 to 17 years).
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Faces Pain Scale revised (FPS-r) for parents
Time Frame: Day 0
Pain will be assessed by a parent using the FPS-r. FPS-r is a tool which has been validated and has been shown to be reliable in intercultural children and adolescents population (4 to 17 years).
Day 0
Differential cost of the two strategies compared to the differential pain
Time Frame: Day 0
Differential cost of the two strategies compared to the differential pain, self-reported by children with the FPS-r. Cost assessment of the two strategies will be made by a micro-costing analysis. The parameters analyzed will be : the strategy used (Buzzy® device or EMLAPATCH), the nurses' time and the time spent by child in the vaccination center. This parameters will be aggregated and will be presented in the form of a cost-effectiveness differential ratio and acceptability curves.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lescop Katia, IDE, Nantes university hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 14, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaccination

Clinical Trials on Buzzy® device

3
Subscribe