OrACELL™ vs. Connective Tissue in Miller Class 3 Defects

July 20, 2017 updated by: Texas A&M University

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROOT COVERAGE USING OrACELL™ VERSUS SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

The purpose was to compare root coverage outcomes between autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) and decellularized human dermis (OrACELL™) in areas of facial gingival recession.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Twenty-four non-smoking, healthy patients, with 2mm or greater facial gingival recession at a minimum of one site that classified as a Miller Class I, II, or III recession defect were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either control (CTG) or OrACELL™ (test) groups, which were treated with identical surgical techniques. All root coverage clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline, 3-, and 6-months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be between 18 and 80 years old, with recession present in one quadrant as either single or multiple buccal vertical recession sites
  2. The defect must be at least 2mm in length, (measured from the CEJ to the midfacial gingival margin) and classified as either Miller Class I, II or III
  3. Study is limited to vital and nonvital incisors, canines, and premolars
  4. If teeth adjacent to the site to be treated had recession as well, they were included in the grafting procedure but not included in measurement
  5. Plaque control defined as modified O'Leary Index of 85% was established before surgical intervention
  6. Only sites with probing depths of 3mm or less and no bleeding on probing were accepted for surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who smoke more than ten cigarettes per day or use nicotine replacement therapy
  2. History of previous history of surgery performed at surgical sites included in study
  3. Subjects who have uncontrolled or poorly controlled systemic conditions that could compromise or contraindicate periodontal surgery
  4. Non-English speakers
  5. Pregnant or lactating females
  6. Immunosuppressant medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Connective Tissue Graft
Connective Tissue is harvested from the palate of the subject then placed over the recession defect on the facial of the designated tooth. A coronally advanced flap is raised to cover the connective tissue graft and the recession.
A measured layer of dermis is surgically removed from the palate for use as a graft to cover gingival recession
Other Names:
  • Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
EXPERIMENTAL: OrACELL
Allograft Tissue (human dermis) is removed from packing and placed over the recession defect on the facial of the designated tooth. A coronally advanced flap is raised to cover the OrACELL graft and the recession.
OrACELL is human dermis that undergoes the MATRACELL process. MATRACELL is a patented and validated process that renders allograft tissue acellular, without compromising the biomechanical or desired biochemical properties of an allograft bio-implant for its intended surgical application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival Recession (Root Coverage)
Time Frame: 6 months
The measurement in millimeters of the relationship of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the gingival margin
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 26, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 16, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on Connective Tissue Graft

3
Subscribe