Peri-implant Tissue Stability Following Tissue Augmentation Harvested From Deep Palate or Tuberosity

August 19, 2021 updated by: Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Comparison of Peri-implant Tissue Stability Following Soft Tissue Augmentation Harvested From the Deep Palate or the Tuberosity Area: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This study will compare peri implant tissue stability following connective tissue graft harvested fromLateral Palate or the Tuberosity Area. As far as we know, it remains controversial whether peri-implant soft tissue stability could be achieved after soft tissue augmentation with the connective tissue graft from the tuberosity or the lateral palate. Soft tissue stability evaluated by intra oral scanner will be described as primary outcome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ridge resorption is a common finding after tooth extraction. Recently, there is an increasing concern about this issue during implant-supported reconstruction in the esthetic zone. Although the previous studies supports the guided bone regeneration procedures for reconstruction of contour deficiencies, the replacement of the mineralized materials with the bone has been questioned. Therefore, recently, using connective tissue grafts instead of allogenic or xenogenic materials has been addressed.

The palate is routinely used as the donor site for harvesting the connective tissue graft. The graft can be harvested by de-epithelialized method or it can be harvested conventionally from deep palate during flap elevation. Another choice for harvesting the connective tissue graft is the tuberosity area, which can be used when you need small to moderate amount of soft tissue (around 1-2 implants). The connective tissues harvested from these sites have quite different characteristics, which might influence on the fate of the treatment in terms of the stability.

therefore, we decided to compare the stability of the grafts harvested from the deep palate or tuberosity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. more than 18 years old.
  2. systemically and periodontally healthy patients.
  3. need of single implant placement between two maxillary teeth.
  4. need of tissue augmentation due to concavity or soft tissue thickness less than 2 millimetres .
  5. more than 3 month after extraction.
  6. full mouth plaque index lesser than 20%.
  7. sufficient mesiodistal and buccolingual space.
  8. At least 10 millimetres mesiodistal dimension in tuberosity.
  9. sufficient implant primary stability.
  10. at least 6 mm crestal ridge width.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of periodontitis and radiotherapy.
  2. Need of horizontal ridge augmentation.
  3. Previous soft tissue augmentation.
  4. Heavy smoker( more than 10 cigarette per day)
  5. Local or systemic conditions that would interfere with routine periodontal therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CTG from deep palate
The connective tissue graft harvested from the deep palate during flap elevation for implant placement
Connective tissue graft surgery will be done for increasing soft tissue volume. In this methods connective tissue will be harvested from lateral palate or tuberosity area.
Experimental: CTG from tuberosity
The connective tissue graft harvested from the tuberosity
Connective tissue graft surgery will be done for increasing soft tissue volume. In this methods connective tissue will be harvested from lateral palate or tuberosity area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
soft tissue volume change 0-3
Time Frame: from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 3 months
changes of soft tissue volume from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 3 months by intra oral scanner
from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 3 months
soft tissue volume change 0-6
Time Frame: from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 6 months
changes of soft tissue volume from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 6 months by intra oral scanner
from baseline (immediately before surgery) to 6 months
soft tissue volume change 3-6
Time Frame: from 3 months to 6 months
changes of soft tissue volume from 3 months to 6 months by intra oral scanner
from 3 months to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: immediately after surgery
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
immediately after surgery
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 1
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 1
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 2
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 2
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 3
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 3
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 4
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 4
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 5
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 5
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 6
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 6
The level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale
Time Frame: day 7
evaluation of the level of the pain by questionnaire through visual analogue scale method
day 7
Palliative 0-7
Time Frame: immediately after surgery to 7 days later
the number of palliatives the patient used during the first week after surgery
immediately after surgery to 7 days later
Pink aesthetic score
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
evaluation of the aesthetic score by photography
3 months after surgery
Pink aesthetic score
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
evaluation of the aesthetic score by photography
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neda Moslemi, Periodontist, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 20, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 9811213001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tissue Transplantation

Clinical Trials on connective tissue graft

Subscribe