Intra-articular Adipose Tissue Injections for Osteoarthritis

October 2, 2019 updated by: Thomas Vangsness, University of Southern California

A Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intra-articular, Autologous Adipose Tissue Injections for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Osteoarthritis

A new generation of "minimally manipulated" regenerative treatments are being offered at clinics across the country, but there is no strong efficacy data to support their use. The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect size of the treatment by comparing the efficacy of autologous fat to the current standard of care treatment, hyaluronic acid (HA). As a secondary aim, we will test for preliminary evidence of efficacy of autologous fat vs. HA and determine how these treatments effect the biochemical environment of the knee by comparing pre-injection and post-injection synovial fluid biomarker profiles.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, fat treatments administered for structural reconstruction, repair, or replacement are being increasingly offered at clinics across the country. These treatments contain both autologous cells that are often referred to as "stem cells" or "MSCs" and extra-cellular matrix (ECM). Cell therapies containing ECM are thought to have the following advantages over treatments prepared using enzymatic digestion: (1) preservation of the stromal vascular niche, which allows time-release of the regenerative factors; (2) release of bioactive molecules by exosomes, which have been demonstrated to be significantly greater in mechanically processed fat than enzymatically processed fat; and (3) maintenance of the structural and morphologic unit, which is thought to increase cell efficacy by making the cells more resilient to the harsh conditions in the recipient environment. Case reports investigating the use of autologous fat treatments show promise, but a number of questions remain unanswered. Agents injected into the joint tend to be quickly cleared from the body and ECM itself has the potential to produce inflammatory signals and induce osteoarthritis.

This study will use a Hyaluronic acid (HA) as an active control, which is the standard of care for pain associated with osteoarthritis. The use of HA as an active control for autologous cell-based therapies is well established and is the best option given the need to aspirate fat tissue from patients who will be receiving the study treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Recruiting
        • Keck Medicine of USC
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 45 to 75, inclusive
  2. Normal axial alignment
  3. X-ray, Kellgren-Lawrence OA grade 2 - 3, inclusive
  4. WOMAC-pain: Between 9 and 19, inclusive
  5. Willingness to participate all scheduled follow-ups
  6. Willingness to refrain from taking NSAIDs, level 2 analgesics, and opioids for the course of the study
  7. BMI < 40

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating
  2. Intra-articular injection within 3 months of treatment
  3. Inflammatory arthritis
  4. Any disease or active drug use that significantly compromises coagulation
  5. Significant damage and/or tears of the ACL or other supporting tissues
  6. Prior knee surgery in the last 6 months in the knee that will be injected
  7. Active tobacco use
  8. Active alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months of study entry
  9. Known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronan (sodium hyaluronate) preparations
  10. Knee joint infections, skin diseases or infections in the area of the injection site
  11. Diabetes
  12. Active inhaler use
  13. Any medical condition, which in the opinion of the clinical investigator, would interfere with the treatment or outcome evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Autologous adipose tissue knee injection
Fat will be removed from the abdomen and processed using the Lipogems device. Approximately 5ml of the microfragmented fat product will be injected into the knee joint.

20ml to 40ml of subcutaneous adipose tissue will be aspirated from the abdomen. Adipose tissue will be processed using the Lipogems device, a closed-loop processing device used in medical procedures involving the harvesting, concentrating and transferring of autologous adipose tissue.

The resulting fat product will be delivered locally via ultrasound-guided, intra-articular injection.

Other Names:
  • Lipogems, Microfragmented fat
Active Comparator: Hyaluronic Acid knee injection
Hyaluronic Acid - Synvisc-One®: A high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate (HA). HA is an FDA approved, standard of care treatment.
Synvisc-One® is a high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pain items of then Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A)
Time Frame: Change from baseline WOMAC score at 6 months
WOMAC-A is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain.
Change from baseline WOMAC score at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item (PROMIS®-29)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in PROMIS-29 from baseline to 6 months
A collection of 4-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item.
Change from baseline in PROMIS-29 from baseline to 6 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: Change from baseline in PROMIS-29 from baseline to 6 months
WOMAC is a widely used, proprietary set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints.
Change from baseline in PROMIS-29 from baseline to 6 months
Clinical Anchors
Time Frame: Clinical anchors from baseline to 6 months
Clinical anchors will be used to identify minimal important differences in treatment groups
Clinical anchors from baseline to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Synovial fluid analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months
Selected OA biomarker profiles that define different OA phenotypes predict the responses to autologous adipose tissue injections
Baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months
Short-term clinical evaluation - WOMAC
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks
WOMAC questionnaire will be administered at the 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline at 6 weeks
Short-term clinical evaluation - PROMIS
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks
PROMIS questionnaire will be administered at the 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline at 6 weeks
Force Plate Analysis
Time Frame: Assessment and change from baseline to 6 weeks and 6 months
Balance will be assessed using a proprietary force plate system at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months.
Assessment and change from baseline to 6 weeks and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: C.Thomas Vangsness, MD, Keck School of Medicine of USC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Autologous adipose tissue injection

Subscribe