NEOadjuvant Chemotherapy Only Compared With Standard Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (NEOLAR)

September 26, 2017 updated by: Ismail Gögenur, Zealand University Hospital

NEOadjuvant Chemotherapy Only Compared With Standard Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase II Trial

The main clinical hypothesis is that compared to radio-chemotherapy for low and mid rectal tumors or surgery for high rectal tumors neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the rate of distant relapse without increasing the rate of local relapse.

The aim of the present study is to compare long term and short term outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing standard treatment (radio-chemotherapy/surgery) or experimental neoadjuvant chemotherapy/surgery Furthermore, early surgical and medical complications, the functional outcome, toxicity and quality of life (QoL) may be improved if radiotherapy can be avoided.

Exploratory analyses are planned in order to find potential predictive markers for selecting patients to either radio-chemotherapy/surgery or neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy/surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The standard treatment of locally advanced but resectable cancer in the middle or lower rectum is preoperative radio-chemotherapy and in the upper part initial surgery. The clinical benefit from radio-chemotherapy is primarily through a reduction in local relapse but the treatment is associated with acute toxicity and long term functional dysfunction. Subsequently, it is important to select patients with high risk of local relapse. Intense systemic combination chemotherapy reduces the risk of distant relapse and increases survival in the postoperative setting. The biological rationale is eradication of micrometastases and hence it may be anticipated that earlier, i.e. neoadjuvant, combination therapy may improve systemic control.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

124

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Lars Henrik Jensen, MD

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adenocarcinoma of the rectum with the lower boarder within 15 cm from the anal verge
  • Locally advanced tumor based on imaging
  • T3 tumors within 10 cm from the anal verge fulfilling the criteria for preoperative radio-chemotherapy according to Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) guidelines
  • T3c or T4 tumors 10-15 cm from the anal verge
  • Deemed resectable at the multidisciplinary team (MDT) conference
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Age at least 18 years
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function allowing systemic chemotherapy
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5x109/l and thrombocytes ≥ 100x109/l.
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper normal value and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 3 x upper normal value
  • Calculated or measured renal glomerular filtration rate at least 30 mL/min
  • Anticonception for fertile women and for male patients with a fertile partner. Intrauterine device, vasectomy of a female subject's male partner or hormonal contraceptive are acceptable
  • Written and orally informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Distant metastasis
  • Invasive ingrowth into other organs
  • Incapacity, frailty, disability and comorbidity to a degree that according to the investigator is not compatible with combination chemotherapy
  • Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis
  • Previous treatment with 5FU or oxaliplatin
  • Surgery within two weeks
  • Neuropathy NCI grade > 1
  • Other malignant tumor within 5 years except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ cervicis uteri
  • Pregnant (positive pregnancy test) or breast feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A, capecitabine
Radiochemotherapy with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions concomitantly with chemotherapy
Radio-chemotherapy with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to tumor and regional lymph nodes concomitantly with capecitabine 825 mg/m2 b.i.d
Experimental: B, FOLFOX or CAPOX
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX (oxaliplatin/capecitabine) or FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5FU), according to institutional practice
Six cycles: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 day 1, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus day 1 and 5FU 2400 mg/ m2 over 46-48 hours day 1-3, repeated every two weeks.
Other Names:
  • FOLFOX (oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5FU)
Four cycles: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. days 1-14, repeated every 3 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
All patients will be evaluated with CT and MRI scans and clinically every 6 months for 2 years and annually until the number of events is reached and the trial is stopped (max 5 years)
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
All patients will be evaluated with CT and MRI scans and clinically every 6 months for 2 years and annually for maximum 5 years
5 years
Local relapse
Time Frame: 5 years
Defined to be within the pelvis. Any relapse should be verified by biopsy
5 years
Distant relapse
Time Frame: 5 years
Defined to be outside the pelvis. Any relapse should be verified by biopsy
5 years
Early toxicity
Time Frame: 5 years
Evaluated using CTCEA (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.
5 years
Late toxicity
Time Frame: 5 years
Evaluated using CTCEA version 4.
5 years
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 5 years
Measured with LARS questionnaire
5 years
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 5 years
Measured with EORTC QoL questionnaire
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ismail Gögenur, MD, Department of Surgery, ZUH
  • Principal Investigator: Lars Henrik Jensen, MD, Vejle Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intestinal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Capecitabine

3
Subscribe