Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Medical Device in Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis

September 18, 2017 updated by: Oystershell NV
This study evaluates the effect of the medical device "Excilor® Fungal Nail Infection" in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Half of the participants will receive the tested product and the other half will receive a comparator (Amorolfin 5%). Patients will be followed during 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tunis, Tunisia
        • Hospital Habib Thameur
      • Tunis, Tunisia
        • Principal instruction military hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject having given her/his informed, written consent,
  • Subject cooperative and aware of the modalities of use and the necessity and duration of the controls so that perfect adhesion to the protocol can be expected.
  • Subject being psychologically able to understand information and to give their/his/her consent.
  • Age: more than 18 years.
  • Subject with superficial onychomycosis on at least one great toenail or light to moderate disto-lateral onychomycosis (without matrix involvement and involvement <2/3 of the tablet).
  • Subject with positive results of KOH staining.
  • Subject having stopped any systemic antifungal treatment since at least 6 months before inclusion and/or any topical antifungal treatment since at least 3 months before inclusion.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential should use an accepted contraceptive regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after the study end.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject considered by the Investigator likely to be non-compliant with the protocol.
  • Patient enrolled in another clinical trial during the test period.
  • Woman being pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the course of this study.
  • Subject having a known allergy to one of the constituents of the tested products.
  • Patient suffering from serious or progressive diseases (to investigator's discretion), such as diabetes, peripheral circulatory disease, HIV, psoriasis, lichen planus, immunosuppressive pathology….
  • Subject with cutaneous pathology on studied zone (other than onychomycosis like angioma, dermatitis…).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Excilor
2 applications per day for 6 months
Active Comparator: Loceryl 5%
1 application per week for 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
At the end of the study (day 168), evolution of the percentage of healthy surface versus baseline, was evaluated by a blinded investigator. Comparison with the comparator product.
Time Frame: After 168 days of treatment
Percentage healthy surface was assessed using digital image analysis. Briefly, two macro-photographs (top and front) were made of the great toenail, placed beside a piece of graph paper to allow determination of the exact size of the nail during analysis (contour tracing). Consequently, all pictures were digitalised and recorded on the computer. Image analysis of the top picture was performed with Adobe Photoshop software. For each photograph, a blinded dermatologist traced the healthy surface.
After 168 days of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
At different time points, evolution of the percentage of healthy surface versus baseline, was evaluated by a blinded investigator. Comparison with the comparator product.
Time Frame: After 14, 28, 56 and 112 days of treatment
Percentage healthy surface was assessed using digital image analysis. Briefly, two macro-photographs (top and front) were made of the great toenail, placed beside a piece of graph paper to allow determination of the exact size of the nail during analysis (contour tracing). Consequently, all pictures were digitalised and recorded on the computer. Image analysis of the top picture was performed with Adobe Photoshop software. For each photograph, a blinded dermatologist traced the healthy surface.
After 14, 28, 56 and 112 days of treatment
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy assessed by the investigator with structured scales. Comparison with the comparator product.
Time Frame: On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168

Onycholysis, nail dystrophy, nail discoloration and nail thickening were assessed using the following scores:

0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 =moderate, and 4 = severe.

On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168
Evaluation of the microbiological efficacy of the product assessed by fungal culture and comparison with the comparator product.
Time Frame: On baseline (day zero) and day 168
On baseline (day zero) and day 168
Evaluation of the product tolerance, assessed by the investigator by clinical evaluation and subject interrogatory with a score from 0 (bad tolerance) to 3 (very good tolerance).
Time Frame: After 14, 28, 56 and 112 days of treatment
After 14, 28, 56 and 112 days of treatment
Evaluation of the quality of life of the subjects thanks to the questionnaire NailQoL . Comparison with the comparator product.
Time Frame: On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168
On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168
Subjective evaluation by subjects by completing the subjective evaluation questionnaire at each visit.
Time Frame: On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168
On Day 0, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 and Day 168

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nejib Doss, MD, Principal Instruction military hospital of Tunis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Onychomycosis

Clinical Trials on Excilor

3
Subscribe