Efficacy in Ablative Fractional Laser Assisted Photodynamic Therapy According to Ablative Depth for Actinic Keratosis

Er:YAG ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT) has shown significant benefit for the treatment of actinic keratosis(AK). Er:YAG ablative fractional laser ablates the epidermis and dermis without significant thermal injury, creating microscopic ablation zones (MAZ) in the portion of the skin that the laser is applied to. The formed MAZ depends on the laser parameters such as laser depth, laser density and laser passes, which affect the treatment outcome.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Actinic Dermatosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application; Drug: MAL application; Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp; Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity; Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment

Detailed Description

The investigators aimed to investigate whether the use of increased laser ablative depth affects the efficacy, side effects, cosmetic outcomes, and PPIX accumulation of AFL-PDT for facial AK in a randomized clinical trial.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 45
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Korea, Republic of
  • Busan, Seo-gu, Korea, Republic of, 602-715, Korea, Republic of
    • Dong-A University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Korean patients aged ≥ 18 years who had biopsy-confirmed Actinic keratosis lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

• photosensitivity disorder patients
• lactating or pregnant women
• patients with porphyria or a known allergy to any of the constituents of the MAL cream and lidocaine
• patients with systemic disease, history of malignant melanoma, tendency of melasma development or keloid formation, any AK treatment of the area in the previous 4 weeks, or any conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance; and patients on immunosuppressive treatment

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
• Masking: Triple

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 150μm-AFL-PDT	Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application; For AFL pre-treatment, lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) cream (EMLA; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area under occlusion for 30 min; Drug: MAL application; Immediately after AFL treatment, an approximately 1- mm-thick layer of MAL (Metvix, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and on 5 mm of surrounding normal tissue. Incubation time is 3 hours; Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp; After incubation for 3 hours, the dressing and cream were removed, and the area was cleansed with saline. The area was irradiated with a red light-emitting diode lamp (Aktilite CL 128; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with peak emission at 632 nm, placed 5 cm away from the skin surface, and a total light dose of 37 J/cm-2. All patients wore protective goggles during illumination.; Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity; After 3 hours of application with MAL, saline wash was performed and fluorescence imaging analysis was performed with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence (610 nm-700 nm) was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.; Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment; After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 150 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density and a single pulse
Experimental: 350μm-AFL-PDT	Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application; For AFL pre-treatment, lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) cream (EMLA; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area under occlusion for 30 min; Drug: MAL application; Immediately after AFL treatment, an approximately 1- mm-thick layer of MAL (Metvix, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and on 5 mm of surrounding normal tissue. Incubation time is 3 hours; Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp; After incubation for 3 hours, the dressing and cream were removed, and the area was cleansed with saline. The area was irradiated with a red light-emitting diode lamp (Aktilite CL 128; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with peak emission at 632 nm, placed 5 cm away from the skin surface, and a total light dose of 37 J/cm-2. All patients wore protective goggles during illumination.; Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity; After 3 hours of application with MAL, saline wash was performed and fluorescence imaging analysis was performed with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence (610 nm-700 nm) was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.; Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment; After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 150 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density and a single pulse
Experimental: 500μm-AFL-PDT	Drug: lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) application; For AFL pre-treatment, lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) cream (EMLA; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area under occlusion for 30 min; Drug: MAL application; Immediately after AFL treatment, an approximately 1- mm-thick layer of MAL (Metvix, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and on 5 mm of surrounding normal tissue. Incubation time is 3 hours; Device: irradiation with red light-emitting diode lamp; After incubation for 3 hours, the dressing and cream were removed, and the area was cleansed with saline. The area was irradiated with a red light-emitting diode lamp (Aktilite CL 128; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with peak emission at 632 nm, placed 5 cm away from the skin surface, and a total light dose of 37 J/cm-2. All patients wore protective goggles during illumination.; Other: Measurements of the fluorescence intensity; After 3 hours of application with MAL, saline wash was performed and fluorescence imaging analysis was performed with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence (610 nm-700 nm) was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.; Device: 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment; After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 150 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density and a single pulse

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Differences of short-term complete response rates between 3 groups	Lesion responses were classified as either a complete response (complete disappearance of the lesion) or a noncomplete response (incomplete disappearance)	Short-term complete response rates were evaluated at 3 months after treatment
Differences of long-term complete response rates between 3 groups	In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.	Long-term complete response rates were evaluated at 12 months
Difference of the recurrence rates between 3 groups	In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.	Recurrence rates were evaluated respectively at 12 months after treatment
Differences of the fluorescence intensity between 3 groups	After 3 hours of application with MAL, Fluorescence imaging analysis was performed on treatment area with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.	After 3 hours of application with MAL, fluorescence intensity imaging was assessed 10 minutes before illumination.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Differences of cosmetic outcomes between 3 groups	Cosmetic outcomes were graded as excellent (slight redness or pigmentation change), good (moderate redness or pigmentation change), fair (slight-to-moderate scarring, atrophy, or induration), or poor (extensive scarring, atrophy, or induration)	The overall cosmetic outcome was assessed 12 months after treatment
Difference of adverse events (erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, edema, itching, oozing, bleeding) rates between 3 groups	Adverse events reported by the patient were noted at each follow-up visit, including severity, duration and need for additional therapy. All events due to PDT were described as phototoxic reactions (i.e., erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, oedema, itching, oozing, bleeding and so forth).	Within 12 months after each treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Dong-A University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 30, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): September 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 26, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 26, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): October 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 31, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 29, 2017
• Last Verified: October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: actinic keratosis; photodynamic therapy; ablative fractional laser; protoporphyrin IX; ablative depth
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions; Keratosis, Actinic; Keratosis; Skin Diseases; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Central Nervous System Depressants; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Sensory System Agents; Anesthetics; Membrane Transport Modulators; Anesthetics, Local; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers; Sodium Channel Blockers; Anesthetics, Combined; Lidocaine; Prilocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
• Other Study ID Numbers: DAUderma-08

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO