Analgesia for Laparotomy in Cancer Patients: Quadratus Lumborum Block

October 31, 2017 updated by: Alaa Mazy

Analgesia for Laparotomy in Cancer Patients:Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

Regional anesthesia of the abdomen significantly reduce postoperative pain, spare the systemic opioids and decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting. Multiple regional techniques can be performed at the neuro-axis (epidural), the nerve root (paravertebral) and the peripheral nerve (transversus abdominis plane).

Quadratus lumborum (QL) block is an addition into the league of truncal nerve block techniques that has been found to provide analgesia for abdominal surgeries. Several case reports have shown that local anesthetic injection around the quadratus lumborum muscle is effective in providing pain relief after various abdominal operations and in patients with chronic pain.

The study hypothesis is that quadratus lumborum block in single shot may be more superior to transversus abdominus plane block as regard intra-operative and the post-operative analgesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized controlled study conducted at Oncology Center-Mansoura University.

102 patients were randomly allocated by closed envelope method into 2 equal groups:

  • Quadratus lumborum block Group (Q) (n= 51): patients received 15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine + 10 ml saline + 50 ug dexmedetomidine + epinephrine (1:100,000) for each side.
  • Transversus abdominis plane Group (T) (n= 51): patients received 15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine + 10 ml of saline + 50 ug dexmedetomidine + epinephrine (1:100,000) for each side.

All blocks were performed after induction of general anesthesia and approximately 15 min before the skin incision.

  • Technique of ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum Block: patient lie in lateral position to obtain appropriate view of quadratus lumborum and transversus abdominins plane extension of lateral abdominal muscles. In this approach, a high-frequency linear transducer (7-12 MHZ) attached to ultrasound machine was placed in anterior axillary line to visualize the typical triple abdominal layers. At the junction of the tapered ends of abdominal muscles and quadratus lumborum, a 21 G cannula needle was inserted in plane and confirmed its position by injecting saline. Under ultrasound guidance, saline separating thoracolumbar fascia from muscle is observed then local anesthetic is injected.
  • Technique of ultrasound guided Transversus abdominis plane Block: Patient lie in supine position and high-frequency linear transducer (7-12 MHZ) attached to ultrasound machine placed in anterior axillary line between costal margin and iliac crest to visualize the typical triple abdominal layers. A 21 G cannula needle is then moved forward from an anteromedial position in a posterior and lateral direction using an in-plane technique with the entry point in the skin being separated from the probe in order to improve needle visibility in the long axis. The needle tip is inserted between transversus abdominis muscle and internal oblique muscle then local anesthetic is injected to produce separation between the two muscle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 35516
        • Oncolgy Center, Mansoura University,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for open abdominal cancer surgery.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade I and grade II.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient refusal. 2. Neuromuscular diseases (as myopathies, myasthenia gravies, …...) 3. Hematological diseases, bleeding or coagulation abnormality. 4. Psychiatric diseases. 5. Local skin infection and sepsis at site of the block. 6. Known intolerance to the study drugs. 7. Body Mass Index > 40 Kg/m2.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Quadratus lumborum block Group
ultrasound guided
15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine + 10 ml saline + 50 micro gram dexmedetomidine + epinephrine (1:100,000) for each side.
Other Names:
  • Group Q
Active Comparator: Transversus abdominis plane block Group
ultrasound guided
15 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine + 10 ml of saline + 50 micro gram dexmedetomidine + epinephrine (1:100,000) for each side.
Other Names:
  • Group T

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The total dose of morphine consumption
Time Frame: postoperative: in the first 24-hour
milligram
postoperative: in the first 24-hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the time to the first analgesic requirement
Time Frame: postoperative: in the first 24-hour
hours
postoperative: in the first 24-hour
pain intensity by visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: postoperatively, at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
0-10 point visual analogue scale. 0 is no pain, 10 the worst pain.
postoperatively, at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
sedation score by Modified Ramsay sedation score
Time Frame: postoperative, at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours

1-6 scale, 1. Anxious, agitated, restless. 2. Awake, but tranquil and cooperative. 3. Responsive to commands only.

4. Brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. 5. Sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus.

6. No response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus.

postoperative, at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours
postoperative nausea, vomiting
Time Frame: postoperative in the first 24 hours
percent
postoperative in the first 24 hours
Mean blood pressure
Time Frame: intraoperatively every 30 minutes, then at 0, 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 hours postoperatively.
millimeter mercury
intraoperatively every 30 minutes, then at 0, 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 hours postoperatively.
Heart rate
Time Frame: intraoperatively every 30 minutes, then at 0, 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 hours postoperatively.
beat/minute
intraoperatively every 30 minutes, then at 0, 2, 4, 8,16 and 24 hours postoperatively.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MS/15.12.97

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

after publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

no limit

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Quadratus lumborum block

Subscribe