SME Ambassadors Pilot Project Research Study

January 21, 2019 updated by: Dr. Wang Man-Ping, The University of Hong Kong

Community-based Mental Wellness Project for Adolescents and Adults: SME (Sharing, Mind, Enjoyment) Ambassadors Pilot Project

Aims: To enhance mental well-being of adults by creating a positive, happy and joyful environment in the community.

Targets: Adults aged 18-59 in Hong Kong.

Methods: SME Ambassadors Pilot Project will adopt the public health and family-focused approach, under the brand name of "Joyful@HK Campaign". Evidence-based and Evidence Generating approach with vigorous study design, both qualitative (e.g. focus groups) and quantitative (e.g. pre- and post- test), will be used to evaluate the overall programme effectiveness including follow-up of at least one month ("best science"). To ensure the practicability and sustainability of the community-based engagement project, we will engage community partners with strong track records of "best practice" to design, plan, and implement the intervention. This project will use innovative and integrated positive psychology and public health theories and methods to plan brief, simple, and cost-effective intervention.

Significance: By using "best science" in the design and evaluation of intervention programme, and the "best practice" of the partners' skills, experience and strong connection with service targets in the community, the intervention, if proven to be effective, for promoting sharing, mind and enjoyment and enhancing mental well-being can be further developed and widely disseminated to and adopted by the practitioners in the health and social service sectors for replication and improvement to benefit the whole population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

SME Ambassadors Pilot Project is one of the six Community-based Mental Wellness Project for Adolescents and Adults, which aims at enhancing mental well-being of adolescents, adults and their families by creating a positive, happy and joyful environment in the community. The Project is funded by Health Care and Promotion Fund of Food and Health Bureau.

SME Ambassadors Pilot Project is organized by the Hong Kong Council of Social Service and led by School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong(HKU). The project will organize two train-the-ambassador workshops to train 60-80 SME ambassadors on positive thinking and understanding of adult mental health problem (in particular the mixed anxiety and depressive disorder) and mental well-being.

The trained SME ambassadors will provide voluntary services and promote mental well-being messages to vulnerable groups, such as ex-mental illness people, new arrivals, etc.

The major subjects of the SME Ambassadors Pilot Project are 60-80 SME ambassadors who aged 18-59. 10-12 service providers from NGO service units (community partners) and 100-120 voluntary service recipients will also be involved in the study. Pre- and post-test evaluation will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention programme.

In the study, SME Ambassadors will be invited to complete questionnaires to measure their sharing, mind and enjoyment related behavioural indicators and invited to attend the focus group interviews to understand their experience during the programme; while community partners will be invited to attend individual interviews to collect their feedback and components on improving future community-based mental wellness programme.

Evaluation will be conducted during the programme implementation stage. The effectiveness of the intervention, as well as the level of participation and ratings for the intervention will also be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Council of Social Service

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) SME Ambassadors (major subjects):

  • Adults who aged 18-59
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete study questionnaires/ focus groups (2) Service recipients (which may include children/adolescents)
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete study questionnaires/ focus groups (3) Community partners
  • Service provider and participating NGO service units
  • Chinese speaking
  • Able to complete study questionnaires/ individual in-depth interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who cannot read Chinese
  • Those who suffered from severe mental illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: SME Ambassadors training & program
- SME Ambassadors will participate in train-the-ambassador workshops and provide voluntary services and promote mental well-being activities to vulnerable groups.
  • Two train-the-ambassador workshops: to train the ambassadors on positive thinking and understanding of adult mental health problem (in particular the mixed anxiety and depressive disorder) and mental well-being.
  • The trained SME ambassadors will provide voluntary services and promote mental well-being messages to vulnerable groups, such as ex-mental illness people, new arrivals, etc.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in participants' frequency of performing the suggested Sharing, Mind and Enjoyment (SME) related behaviours
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
The frequency of performing the SME (Sharing: share happy experience with others, help others, express care to others; Mind: recall the good memory, be grateful for what you already have, keep positive; Enjoyment: enjoy physical activity) related behaviours in the past 7 days will be assessed. The questions are rated 0-7 with 0 indicating none of this behavior happened in the past 7 days and 7 indicating this behavior happened every day in the past 7 days.
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in personal happiness from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Personal happiness will be assessed by Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). SHS was rated on 7-point scale with 1 indicating no happiness at all and 7 indicating extreme happiness. To score the scale, the 4th item will be coded reversely and mean of the 4 items will be computed.
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in mental well-being from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Mental well-being will be assessed by validated Chinese version of 7-item Warwick Edinburgh Well-being Scale. Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and the scale will be scored by first summing the score for each of the 7 items and then transforming the total score for each person according to a conversion table.
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in family relationship from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Self-perceived understanding, intimacy, and family communication will be assessed by three questions (rated 0-10).
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in individual and family health from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Self-perceived health, at the individual and family level will be assessed by two questions respectively (rated 0-10).
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in family happiness from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Self-perceived happiness, at the individual and family level will be assessed by two questions respectively (rated 0-10).
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in family harmony from baseline to three-month after baseline
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Self-perceived family harmony will be assessed by a single question (rated 0-10).
T1: baseline; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Changes in knowledge and perception of mixed anxiety and depressive disorders
Time Frame: T1: baseline; T2: immediate post intervention; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Knowledge and perception of mixed anxiety and depressive disorders will be assessed by 4 questions (2 questions about understanding of symptoms, 1 about the intention of help seeking, 1 about support seeking from families) rated 0-10.
T1: baseline; T2: immediate post intervention; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Satisfaction towards SME Ambassador Pilot Project
Time Frame: T2: immediate post intervention; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
Satisfaction towards programme will be assessed by conducting focus group and program evaluation measures (general satisfaction, self-perceived helpfulness and likely-to-recommend level) rated 0-10.
T2: immediate post intervention; T3: one-month follow-up after baseline; T4: three-month follow up after baseline
The social impact of the community-based engagement project
Time Frame: Up to four months
The social impact of the community-based engagement project will be evaluated by conducting community stakeholders' in-depth interviews.
Up to four months
The process of community based intervention programme
Time Frame: Up to four months
Assessed by a Process Evaluation on-site observation form, and a series of checklists including Resources input record sheet, Participants' attendance form, Programme rundown, Attendance record form, and NGOs' final report. The components of process evaluation, including context, reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity and recruitment will be assessed.
Up to four months
Outcomes of community engagement process
Time Frame: Up to four months
Outcomes of community engagement process will be assessed by a self-designed questionnaire survey.
Up to four months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Man Ping Wang, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Well-being

Clinical Trials on SME Ambassadors training & program

3
Subscribe