Neuroeconomics of Social Behavior Following Trauma Exposure

August 29, 2022 updated by: Elizabeth Olson, Mclean Hospital

Social Withdrawal Following Trauma Exposure: a Neuroeconomic Approach

This study will use a neuroeconomic paradigm with state-of-the-art imaging protocols to probe abnormal social reward processing underlying social withdrawal in symptomatic trauma-exposed women. By also gathering self-report measures of social anhedonia, performance on non-social and social reward valuation tasks, and measures of real-world social functioning including social network size, we aim to specify how alterations in social reward processing result in social withdrawal and functional impairment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Impaired social functioning is a frequent and disabling sequela of trauma-related disorders. PTSD is associated with a high rate of severe impairment in quality of life relative to other anxiety disorders, including panic disorder, social phobia, and OCD, with particularly marked impairment in social quality of life. Mounting evidence indicates that impairment in quality of life in PTSD is strongly related to its effect on social functioning. Such difficulties are widespread and affect multiple social networks, including marital relationships, and friendships and family relationships. Social withdrawal, defined here in terms of reduced social network size, is of particular interest because of its strong relationship with health outcomes, including increased risk of disability, reduced immune response, and increased mortality risk; most critically, poor social integration is associated with a threefold increase in suicide risk. Because women are at a 2.3-to-3-fold increased risk compared to men of developing PTSD following trauma, understanding the differential neurobiological pathways that may contribute to the development of stress-related disorders in women is particularly critical. Women are more likely than men to endorse social detachment following trauma, especially when the trauma involves exposure to violence.

In this project, we propose abnormal reward processing (anhedonia) as a specific mechanism underlying social withdrawal in trauma-exposed women, and we present a paradigm that capitalizes on advances in neuroeconomics to elucidate the neural underpinnings of social withdrawal. Additionally, we propose to identify the possible influences of a stress peptide (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide: PACAP) implicated in sex-specific changes in social behavior following stress exposure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

168

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Belmont, Massachusetts, United States, 02478
        • Recruiting
        • McLean Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Phase 1 will include healthy volunteers (age 18-45, n = 60).

Phase 2 will include posttraumatic spectrum-socially anhedonic women (PTS-SA, n = 36), posttraumatic spectrum-non-socially anhedonic women (PTS-nonSA), and healthy controls (HC, n = 36).

Description

Phase 1:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-45
  • Self-reported healthy volunteer status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide written informed consent in English
  • Inability to see task due to visual impairment
  • Participants who produce T-scores of 65 or higher on any Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) subscales will not be eligible to remain in the Trust Task participant pool.

Phase 2:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Trauma exposure appropriate to group
  • For trauma-exposed groups the index trauma is actual or threatened physical assault or sexual violence
  • PCL-5 score 33 and above (for PS-SA and PS-nonSA groups)
  • Right handedness
  • Age 18-45
  • English as a first language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological illness (including head injury with loss of consciousness > 5 minutes)
  • Medical conditions that may influence neuroimaging (e.g. HIV)
  • Current or past DSM-5 Axis I disorder (for HC group)
  • History of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia spectrum disorder
  • Contraindications for MRI
  • Alcohol dependence in the past 5 years
  • Substance dependence in the past 3 years
  • Daily substance use in the past year
  • Prescribed psychotropic medication use in the past month
  • Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence- Second Edition (WASI-II) FSIQ < 70.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Phase 1
Healthy control participants will provide neuroeconomic game responses to form a pool of potential responses for participants to interact with during Phase 2.
Phase 2: PTS-SA
posttraumatic spectrum-socially anhedonic
Phase 2: PTS-nonSA
posttraumatic spectrum-non-socially anhedonic
Phase 2: HC
healthy controls

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Group differences in neuroeconomic game performance
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Compared to the PTS-nonSA and HC groups, the PTS-SA group will demonstrate lower investments and slower learning rates on the Trust Task than on the non-social risk task compared with PTS-nonSA and HC subjects
Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Group differences in fMRI BOLD signal
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
The HC and PTS-nonSA groups will show greater ventral striatum (VS), dorsal striatum (DS), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) responses during the outcome phase of the trust game for 'share' versus baseline, compared to the PTS-SA group, for the real partner condition (Trust Task), but not for the risk task.
Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Correlations between behavior and fMRI BOLD signal
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Because social withdrawal will occur in response to reduced social reward value, we hypothesize that across the PTS groups, reduced VS, DS, and mPFC activity during the outcome phase of the trust game for 'share' outcomes will be associated with lower Trust Task investments, greater self-reported social anhedonia, and smaller social network size.
Measured on the day of the MRI scan
PACAP correlations
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Elevated PACAP levels will be associated with lower investments on the Trust Task; decreased social reward signals during the outcome phase for 'share' outcomes in the VS, DS, and mPFC; and smaller social network size.
Measured on the day of the MRI scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mediation analysis
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Within the PTS groups, decreased VS, DS, and mPFC response to 'share' outcomes will mediate the relationship between social anhedonia and reduced social network size.
Measured on the day of the MRI scan
Functional connectivity (psychophysiological interaction)
Time Frame: Measured on the day of the MRI scan
PTS individuals with higher self-reported social anhedonia and social withdrawal will show reduced VS-mPFC connectivity for social rewards on the Trust Task.
Measured on the day of the MRI scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Olson, PhD, McLean Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017P001423
  • K23MH112873-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We will evaluate requests for deidentified data on a case-by-case basis.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

3
Subscribe