- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03386422
Mindfulness Self-Compassion Intervention Versus a Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention to Improve Self-care in Chronic Pain
"Pilot Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Mindfulness Self-Compassion Intervention Versus a Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention to Improve Self-care and Quality of Life in a Chronic Pain Sample"
Approximately 10-23% of people suffer from chronic pain in our country. Chronic pain is associated with emotional distress (anxiety and depression), physical and social impairment and reduction of quality of life in patients who suffer from this condition.
Self-Compassion is a useful attitude in order to regulate emotions, to be able to accept the experience that one is going through and to improve self-care in general population. Cognitive-behavioral programs (CBT) have already demonstrated that they are effective in order to reduce catastrophizing and passive coping with pain. However, effects of Mindful Self-Compassion interventions (based on mindfulness skills but not only) on chronic pain condition are still unknown.
The investigator's principal hypothesis is: MSC program will be, at least, as effective as CBT program in order to improve quality of life, self-compassion, self-care and acceptance capacity; and as effective as CBT to reduce catastrophizing, anxiety and depression in a chronic pain patients sample.
Moreover, investigators also hypothesize that MSC program will be, at least, as effective as CBT program in order to maintain the achieved benefits in a 6 months follow-up.
Investigators will conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial with two treatment arms in a chronic pain sample of patients of Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid.
After all recollection of data is done, investigators will conduct statistic analysis in order to accept or refuse our hypothesis.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Approximately 10-23% of people suffer from chronic pain in our country. Chronic pain is associated with emotional distress (anxiety and depression), physical and social impairment and reduction of quality of life in patients who suffer from this condition.
Recent studies have elucidated that some conditions are clearly correlated with chronic pain, and could explain emotional distress and impairment in these patients. Such conditions are: attention bias to pain, cognitive inflexibility, fear avoidance, catastrophizing, passive coping with pain and no acceptance.
Recent meta-analysis suggest that Mindfulness-based interventions reduce anxiety and pain interference in daily life in patients with chronic pain. They do so through mechanisms that improve capacity of acceptance (whatever the experience is) and reduce catastrophizing. Self-Compassion is a useful attitude in order to regulate emotions, to be able to accept the experience that one is going through and to improve self-care in general population. Cognitive-behavioral programs (CBT) have already demonstrated that they are effective in order to reduce catastrophizing and passive coping with pain. However, effects of Mindful Self-Compassion interventions (based on mindfulness skills but not only) on chronic pain condition are still unknown.
Neff and Germer have developed a specific program to enhance self-compassion named Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) that could be helpful to people with clinical problems. In spite of promising results of this interventions based on acceptation and self-compassion, its effectiveness on chronic pain conditions remains still unclear.
Investigator's principal hypothesis is: MSC program will be, at least, as effective as CBT program in order to improve quality of life, self-compassion, self-care and acceptance capacity; and as effective as CBT to reduce catastrophizing, anxiety and depression in a chronic pain patients sample.
Moreover, investigators also hypothesize that MSC program will be, at least, as effective as CBT program in order to maintain the achieved benefits in a 6 months follow-up.
Investigators will conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial with two treatment arms in a chronic pain sample of patients of Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid.
Both interventions will have 8 sessions, weekly frequency, duration of 2 hours and a half per session, and both programs will be conducted by clinical experts.
Investigators will asses levels of anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, pain interference, pain intensity, self-compassion and quality of life at the beginning of the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and a 6 months follow-up. Investigators also will administer a socio-demographic questionnaire at the beginning of the intervention to collect data about age, gender and pain characteristics.
After all recollection of data is done, investigators will conduct statistic analysis in order to accept or refuse their hypothesis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Hospital Universitario La Paz.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older than 18 years old.
- Being in treatment in the Chronic Pain Unit at Hospital Universitario La Paz because of having a chronic pain of more than 3 months of duration, no matter the aetiology.
- Capable of understanding and giving his or her written informed consent.
- Significant levels of distress related to the pain at the beginning of treatment, assessed by clinical interview and HADS (HADS-A or HADS-D > or = 8).
- Patients that meet criteria for Mixed Adaptive Disorder, mild to moderate Depressive Disorder or Dysthymia, assessed by clinical interview conducted by a psychiatry of the Chronic Pain Unit or Mental Health Center.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intelectual disability or cognitive impairment or dementia.
- Insufficient knowledge of the language to understand and participate on the intervention program.
- Serious mental illness in acute state at the moment of the beginning of the intervention.
- Substance abuse in the last 6 months.
- Autolytic ideas at the moment of the assessment.
- Previous training in mindfulness or CBT techniques.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mindfulness Self-Compassion Intervention MSC
Mindfulness Self-Compassion (MSC) is a standardized program to increase self-compassion. It has been developed by Neff and Germer. The structure of the program is similar to de Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program (MBSR), with duration of sessions between 2 and 2 hours and a half. The frequency of the sessions is one per week for 8 weeks, with practical and experiential exercices in sessions and between sessions. The MSC program focuses primary on helping patients to develop self-compassion, and it includes Mindfulness just as a secondary component. The MSC program will be conducted by a clinician trained in this specific program. |
Mindfulness and Self-Compassion training
|
Active Comparator: Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention CBT
It has been adapted a Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention for Chronic Pain by Moix and Kovacs. Our program will have 8 sessions, with duration of sessions between 2 and 2 hours and a half. The frequency of the sessions is one per week for 8 weeks, with homework between sessions. During these 8 sessions we will train the following techniques: psychoeducation about pain, relaxation training, cognitive restructuring training, solving problem training, psychoeducation about emotions, interpersonal skills and time organization. |
Cognitive-behavioural techniques training
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Self-Compassion
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Self-Compassion Scale (SCS, long version).
Self-compassion and Self-care.
Self-kindness, Common Humanity and Mindfulness.
26 items.
Total score and 3 sub-scores from 1 to 5. Likert scale from 1 to 5.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptance
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). 2 factors: Activity engagement and Pain willingness.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
Acceptance
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). 2 factors: Activity engagement and Pain willingness.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Acceptance
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). 2 factors: Activity engagement and Pain willingness.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
|
Pain interference in daily life.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): pain intensity and impact of pain in daily life.
Investigators will use Impact in daily life sub-scale (7 items).
Scores are from 0 to10.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
Pain Interference
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Pain interference in daily life.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): pain intensity and impact of pain in daily life.
Investigators will use Impact in daily life sub-scale (7 items).
Scores are from 0 to10.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Pain interference in daily life.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): pain intensity and impact of pain in daily life.
Investigators will use Impact in daily life sub-scale (7 items).
Scores are from 0 to10.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Analogical Visual Scale.
From 0 to 10 scores.
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Analogical Visual Scale.
From 0 to 10 scores.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Analogical Visual Scale.
From 0 to 10 scores.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Catastrophising
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
Rumination, magnification of consequences and hopelessness.
13 items, self-administered.
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Catastrophising
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
Rumination, magnification of consequences and hopelessness.
13 items, self-administered.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Catastrophising
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
Rumination, magnification of consequences and hopelessness.
13 items, self-administered.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Health-Related Quality Of Life, Short Form (SF-36).
36 items.
8 sub-scores, no total score.
Physical function, physical role, body pain, general state of health, vitality, social function, emotional role and mental health.
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Health-Related Quality Of Life, Short Form (SF-36).
36 items.
8 sub-scores, no total score.
Physical function, physical role, body pain, general state of health, vitality, social function, emotional role and mental health.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Health-Related Quality Of Life, Short Form (SF-36).
36 items.
8 sub-scores, no total score.
Physical function, physical role, body pain, general state of health, vitality, social function, emotional role and mental health.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Levels of anxiety and depression.
Symptomatology.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
14 items.
2 separated scores, 7 items each: anxiety and depression.
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Levels of anxiety and depression.
Symptomatology.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
14 items.
2 separated scores, 7 items each: anxiety and depression.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Levels of anxiety and depression.
Symptomatology.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
14 items.
2 separated scores, 7 items each: anxiety and depression.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Satisfaction with the treatment (CRES-4).
4 questions.
Scores from 0 to 300.
The higher the punctuation, the higher satisfaction with treatment.
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Adherence to the treatment
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks.
|
Adherence to the treatment (Number of sessions that one patient attends)
|
Up to 8 weeks.
|
Self-Compassion
Time Frame: In a 6 months follow-up
|
Self-Compassion Scale (SCS, long version).
Self-compassion and Self-care.
Self-kindness, Common Humanity and Mindfulness.
26 items.
Total score and 3 sub-scores from 1 to 5. Likert scale from 1 to 5.
|
In a 6 months follow-up
|
Self-Compassion
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Self-Compassion Scale (SCS, long version).
Self-compassion and Self-care.
Self-kindness, Common Humanity and Mindfulness.
26 items.
Total score and 3 sub-scores from 1 to 5. Likert scale from 1 to 5.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Socio- demographic Data: Number of visited doctors.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Number of visited doctors in the last 3 months.
Sociodemographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: Number of visits to emergency units.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Number of visits to emergency units in the last 3 months.
Sociodemographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: course of pain expectation.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Course of pain that the patient expects (improvement, same condition, progressive worsening…) at the moment the intervention starts.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: psychiatric history.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Psychiatric history: whether the patient has or has not a history of mental health services visits for some kind of mental disorder.
Socio-demographic data questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: type of pain.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Type of pain: area of pain in the body, diagnosis related to pain made for patient's doctor.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: time since pain started.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Time since the pain started: amount of time the patient has lived with pain.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: job status.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Job status: whether the patient is student, employed, unemployed, retired, or has a pension because of his/her disability.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: family life.
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Family life: It is asked with whom the patient lives (couple, alone, kids, kids and couple…), if he/she has kids and if he/she lives with them.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: Marital Status
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Marital Status: whether the patient is single, married or in a couple, divorced, or widower.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: Gender
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Gender: Male or female.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Socio- demographic Data: Age
Time Frame: Day 1 of the intervention
|
Age of the patient.
Socio-demographic data Questionnaire.
|
Day 1 of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Beatriz Rodríguez Vega, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafRecruitingChronic Post Operative Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Knee PainSpain
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
University of UtahRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic PainUnited States
-
Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione...RecruitingPost Operative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Post Surgical PainItaly
-
Evolve Restorative CenterFlowonix Medical; Celéri Health, Inc.; Advanced Infusion SolutionsCompletedPain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable | Chronic Nonmalignant PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on MSC
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Fu-Sheng WangUnknownHuman Immunodeficiency Virus | Disorder of Immune ReconstitutionChina
-
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical...UnknownAcute GVH DiseaseChina
-
The Prince Charles HospitalCell and Tissue Therapies Western AustraliaCompletedBronchiolitis Obliterans | Lung TransplantationAustralia
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)TerminatedGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseUnited States
-
King Edward Medical UniversityUnknownSkin Pigmentation Over Contour Deformities of Face | Trauma, Rhomberg DiseasePakistan
-
Indonesia UniversityUnknownNon Union Fracture | Metaphyseal Fibrous DefectIndonesia
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)RecruitingHead and Neck Cancer | XerostomiaUnited States
-
University Hospital TuebingenNot yet recruiting
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityUnknown