Non-Opiate Treatment After Prenatal Opiate Exposure to Prevent Postnatal Injury to the Young Brain (No-POPPY)

April 3, 2024 updated by: Henrietta Bada
The long term goals of our research are to establish the best pharmacological treatment for NAS and determine how pharmacologic treatment of NAS affects long-term developmental outcomes. The objective of this application is to evaluate the effectiveness of clonidine as a treatment for neonates with NAS, in a randomized clinical trial. Our central hypothesis is that clonidine will effectively treat drug withdrawal manifestations in neonates.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this current proposal, the research plan is based on our pilot study, which randomized infants with NAS to receive morphine or clonidine. The treatment groups were similar as to mean birth weight, gestational age, Apgar scores, and postnatal age at treatment. Infants enrolled had no other medical or surgical complications. Treatment was initiated per our NICU standard at the time, and will be continued in this protocol. Total LOS was shorter by about 1 week in the clonidine (mean of 15 days), compared to 21 days in the morphine group.

Aims and Objectives:

To determine whether the treatment of NAS with a non-opiate medication, clonidine, will be more effective than morphine

  • Compare Clonidine and morphine for the treatment of NAS. Compare the efficacy of each drug which is determined by duration of treatment in number of days, number of dose escalations needed to achieve needed treatment, and the need for second drug treatment.
  • Evaluate the neurobehavioral performance scores (habituation, orientation, self- regulation, motor/reflexes, and stress/ abstinence scales) using the neonatal intensive care (NICU) network neurobehavioral scale (NNNS) in both treatment groups. This exam will take place after treatment begins, and at one month post-natal age (38-44 weeks post menstrual age) or at discharge, whichever comes first.

To determine whether treatment of NAS with clonidine will result in better early childhood outcomes than those treated with morphine • Compare the cognitive, motor and behavioral development of children in both treatment groups using the Bayley III Scales of Infant Development at 6 months, one and two years of age.

To build population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models and determine factors that affect exposure and response to morphine and clonidine

• Measure blood levels obtained at random times and correlate to Finnegan scores. The pharmacodynamics may help with understanding NAS medications and coping measures in babies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • Kentucky Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 hours to 1 week (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age (GA) > or equal to 35 weeks
  • Known prenatal opiate exposure (by mother admitting use, mom with positive opiate screen during pregnancy, or positive neonatal urine and meconium screening)
  • No known prenatal cocaine exposure
  • No morphine or clonidine dose before enrollment
  • Symptomatic with Finnegan scores (FS): 3 consecutive scores greater than or equal to 8, OR 2 consecutive scores greater than or equal to 12, and/or with attending decision to treat for NAS
  • Less than or equal to 7 days of age
  • Attending physician decides to start pharmacologic treatment and agrees to infant's study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Seizures
  • Major congenital malformations
  • Blood pressure instability
  • Major medical condition in addition to NAS
  • Parents unable to understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Clonidine
Babies randomized to clonidine will receive 1mcg/kg/dose (with a dosing interval of 3 or 4 hours).
Drug: Clonidine
1mcg/kg/dose (with a dosing interval of 3 or 4 hours), increases by 25% of initial dose every 12-24 hrs. Decrease by 10% of max dose every 24 hrs.
Other Names:
  • clonidine hydrochloride
Active Comparator: Morphine
Babies randomized to morphine will receive 0.06 mg/kg/dose (with a dosing interval of 3 or 4 hours).
Drug: Morphine
Starting dose is 0.06 mg/kg/dose (every 3 or 4 hours), increases by 25% of initial dose every 12-24 hrs. Decrease by 10% of max dose every 24 hrs.
Other Names:
  • Morphine Sulfate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)
Time Frame: 5-10 days post natal age
The summary scores from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) give a measure of infant neurobehavior in the following areas (score range): habituation (1-9), regulation (2.20-7.50), attention (1.29-8.4), Handling (0-1), quality of movement (1.20-6.20), Non-optimal reflexes (0-12), Asymmetric reflexes (0-7), arousal (2.43-6.67), hypertonicity (0-8), hypotonicity (0-5.0), excitability (0-11), lethargy (0-11.0), and stress/abstinence (0-0.57). A higher score for each item means a higher level of the construct. For example, a higher score for hypertonicity means the infant is more hypertonic and higher score on hypotonicity means the infant is more hypotonic. No cut-off score published for normal or abnormal behavioral performance. Reference: Lester BM et al. Summary Statistics of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale Scores From the Maternal Lifestyle Study: A Quasinormative Sample, in Pediatrics 2004; 113,668.
5-10 days post natal age
Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)
Time Frame: At one month post-natal age (between 4-6 weeks of age), or at discharge, whichever comes first
The summary scores from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) give a measure of infant neurobehavior in the following areas (score range): habituation (1-9), regulation (2.20-7.50), attention (1.29-8.4), Handling (0-1), quality of movement (1.20-6.20), Non-optimal reflexes (0-12), Asymmetric reflexes (0-7), arousal (2.43-6.67), hypertonicity (0-8), hypotonicity (0-5.0), excitability (0-11), lethargy (0-11.0), and stress/abstinence (0-0.57). A higher score for each item means a higher level of the construct. For example, a higher score for hypertonicity means the infant is more hypertonic and higher score on hypotonicity means the infant is more hypotonic. No cut-off score published for normal or abnormal behavioral performance. Reference: Lester BM et al. Summary Statistics of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale Scores From the Maternal Lifestyle Study: A Quasinormative Sample, in Pediatrics 2004; 113,668.
At one month post-natal age (between 4-6 weeks of age), or at discharge, whichever comes first
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition
Time Frame: 6 months of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the full-scale score.
6 months of life
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition
Time Frame: 1 year of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the full-scale score.
1 year of life
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition
Time Frame: 2 years of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the full-scale score.
2 years of life

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of treatment
Time Frame: 60 days
Total number days of treatment
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Henrietta Bada

Collaborators

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henrietta S Bada, MD MPH, University of Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-0534-F34
  • 1R01DA043519-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Clonidine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in New Zealand

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe