Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

November 14, 2024 updated by: Chordate Medical

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine

The efficacy of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment will be examined in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine. The medical device system will be applied in 6 treatments at weekly intervals. The study will examine the effects on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical investigation of a medical device. The study consists of a 4-week screening period, a 6-week treatment period (2 weeks run-in and a 4-week observation window to assess the treatment effect), and a 4-week follow-up period.

The study primarily aims at evaluating the effect of intranasal kinetic oscillation stimulation using the Chordate System S211 as a preventative treatment on monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland, 00180
        • Terveystalo Ruoholahti
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00930
        • Helsingin päänsärkykeskus / Aava Itäkeskus
      • Tampere, Finland, 33100
        • Terveystalo Tampere
      • Turku, Finland, 20100
        • Suomen Terveystalo Turku
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20251
        • CTC North am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 70178
        • Lewis Neurologie
    • Bayern
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 80802
        • Neurologie- & Kopfschmerzzentrum
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 81377
        • Klinikum Großhadern / Neurologische Klinik der Universität München
    • Hessen
      • Königstein Im Taunus, Hessen, Germany, 61462
        • Migräne-Klinik Königstein
    • Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
      • Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany, 18147
        • Universitätsmedizin Rostock / Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is legally competent, has been informed of the nature, the scope and the relevance of the study, voluntarily agrees to participation and the study's provisions, and has duly signed the informed consent form (ICF);
  2. Male or female aged between 18 and 65 years (inclusive) at the time of providing informed consent;
  3. Diagnosed as suffering from chronic migraine with or without aura (≥15 headache days per month for more than 3 months before screening including at least 8 migraine days) according to the IHS classification (International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD]-III beta);
  4. Migraine onset before the age of 60 years;
  5. Reported history of migraine for at least 1 year before screening;
  6. Reported stable prophylactic migraine medication regimen, if any, during the 3 months prior to screening;
  7. Able and willing to maintain current prophylactic migraine medication regimen (no change in type, frequency or dose) from screening to end of follow-up;
  8. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods (failure rate <1% per year when used consistently and correctly) during the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to distinguish between migraine headaches and other headache types;
  2. Treatment with Botox in the head/neck area within 4 months of the screening visit, or planned Botox treatment during the study;
  3. Previous or ongoing treatment with an implanted stimulator or other implanted device in the head and/or neck;
  4. Known pronounced anterior septal deviation, or other known relevant abnormality in the nasal cavity, including bacterial infection and wounds;
  5. History of relevant sinus surgery, transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary or other lesions or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea;
  6. Fitted with a pacemaker/defibrillator;
  7. Previously treated with therapeutic x-ray intervention in the facial region (that could have influenced the nasal mucosa);
  8. Ongoing upper respiratory infection or malignancy in the nasal cavity;
  9. History of regular nose bleeding (epistaxis), or concomitant condition or medication that could cause excessive bleeding including treatment with an anticoagulant;
  10. Head injury or open wound that contraindicates use of the Chordate Headband;
  11. Known allergy to polyvinylchloride, a material used in the Chordate Catheter, or medicinal liquid paraffin;
  12. Concurrent condition or risk of non-compliance that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect the interpretation of performance or safety data or which otherwise contraindicates participation in a clinical investigation;
  13. Pregnant and lactating women;
  14. Participation in a clinical investigation within 3 months of enrolment or planned participation at any time during this clinical investigation;
  15. Previous participation in this study;
  16. Employees of the study site or the sponsor directly involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of any such individuals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Treatment
Chordate System S211 in treatment mode
Sham Comparator: Sham Treatment
Chordate System S211 in placebo mode

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline (4-week Screening Period) in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in 4-week Performance Assessment Period.
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Least square mean change from Baseline (4-week screening period) in monthly headache days with moderate to severe intensity in 4-week performance assessment period.
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Headache Days With Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in Monthly Migraine Days
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Mean Change From Baseline to Performance Assessment Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Mean Change From Baseline to Follow-up Period in 4-week Headache Days (Mild, Moderate and Severe Intensity) - All Intensities
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Proportion of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction in Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Performance Assessment Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Proportion of Subjects With 50% or Greater Reduction of Headache Days of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Follow-up Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Performance Assessment Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 14 to Day 42
Change in the Use of Abortive Medication in Follow-up Period
Time Frame: Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Interval from Day -28 to Day 0 and Interval from Day 43 to Day 70
Headache Impact Test
Time Frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

The headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) is a 6-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the extent of disability a subject experiences due to headache by measuring the subject's level of pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The final total score is obtained from simple summation of the 6 items. The total score ranges between 36 and 78, with larger scores reflecting greater impact.

Reported is the change from Baseline in the final total score at the respective visit.

Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) - Role Function - Restrictive
Time Frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

The role function-restrictive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines limit daily activities and interactions during the past 4 weeks. It includes 7 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function restrictive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status.

Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function restrictive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
MSQ - Role Function - Preventive
Time Frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

The role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ assesses how migraines prevent from engaging in daily activities during the past 4 weeks. It includes 4 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the role function-preventive dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status.

Reported is the change from Baseline in the role function-preventive dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
MSQ - Emotional Function
Time Frame: Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)

The emotional function dimension of the MSQ assesses the emotional impact of migraines during the past 4 weeks. It includes 3 items. Each item is scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time). The scores of these items are summed and then transformed to a 0-100 scale. This means the minimum score of the emotional function dimension is 0 and the maximum score is 100 where a higher score indicates a better health status.

Reported is the change from Baseline in the emotional function dimension of the MSQ at the respective visit.

Days -28, 0, 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (follow-up)
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
Time Frame: Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)
The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the subject's impression of disease severity. The subjects rated the severity of their condition on a scale from 1 to 4: 1=normal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe
Days -28 (screening), 0 (visit 1), 14 (Visit 3), 42 (Visit 7), 70 (Follow-up)
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70
n (%) of patients
Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 70

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arne May, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to uncertainties in EU data protection legislation individual deidentified participant data are not shared. The main uncertainty is the concept of what "deidentified" means. It appears not to mean that the data set of a person is simply separated from the person's name. What additional operations have to be done appears to depend on technological capabilities to re-identify the persons associated with the data set. A common perception is that the technological capabilities for re-identification are permanently increasing. This could have the effect that public data sets that are regarded as deidentified now might become re-identifiable data sets in the future. Once this happens, the sponsor is no longer able to make the publication of the data sets un-happen. This could result in punishment by EU data protection authorities. The sponsor wants to avoid this.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Migraine

Clinical Trials on Chordate System S211 in treatment mode

Subscribe