Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (OHTO)

October 25, 2023 updated by: Kuopio University Hospital

High Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy and Conservative Treatment in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis - A Randomised Controlled Trial

A prospective, randomised controlled trial where clinical and radiological outcome of high tibial opening wedge osteotomy with physiotherapy is compared to physiotherapy alone while treating symptomatic medial knee osteoarthrosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

90 Symptomatic patients with mild to moderate medial knee osteoarthrosis are randomized to two groups:

Group 1 (HTO-group) receive an diagnostic arthroscopy with high tibial opening wedge osteotomy (Tomofix-plate). Postoperatively a supervised physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program is started.

Group 2 (FT-group) receive the same supervised physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program without the HTO or arthroscopy.

Primary outcome measure is composite score of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS5).

Secondary outcome measures are pain (VAS), KOOS subscales, objective physical performance measurements, progression of osteoarthrosis (X-ray, MRI), change of mechanical axis, complications, treatment costs, rate of reoperation, revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), biological markers of arthrosis progression, 15D (quality of life assessment), QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life-Year), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, sum of governmental benefits received.

Outcomes will be measured at 24, 60 and 120 months after the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuopio, Finland
        • University Hospital of Kuopio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain: Subjective pain in the knee most of the month for at least one month during past 12 months.
  • Knee range of motion (ROM) at least 5-120 degrees
  • X-ray: medial joint space Altman > 1. Lateral joint space Altman < 2.
  • Mechanical axis > 3 degrees varus alignment.
  • Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) < 90 degrees
  • age 25-55.
  • Written consent, accepts both treatment arms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain is caused by something else than medial knee osteoarthrosis
  • deficient ROM (flexion contracture > 10 degrees, flexion < 110 degrees)
  • significant ligament instability
  • post traumatic OA
  • clinically relevant neurological disease (e.g. Alzheimer´s disease)
  • clinically relevant metabolical disease (e.g. Diabetes)
  • alcohol/drug abuse
  • infectious/inflammatory joint disease
  • previous knee area osteotomy or lower limb arthroplasty
  • smoking (> 0 cigarette per day)
  • obesity (BMI > 33)
  • pregnancy or hope of pregnancy in the following two years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HTO-group
Group receives opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with Tomofix -plate. Operative intervention is followed by supervised physiotherapeutic rehabilitation.
Group that receives high tibial osteotomy combined with supervised physiotherapy as treatment.
Group that receives only supervised physiotherapy as treatment.
Active Comparator: FT -group
Group receives only supervised physiotherapeutic rehabilitation.
Group that receives only supervised physiotherapy as treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of KOOS5
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
The change of Composite score of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales
24, 60, 120 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain measured in numeric rated scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
Amount of subjective (knee) pain
24, 60, 120 months
Change of KOOS subscales
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
Individual subscales of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores
24, 60, 120 months
Change in results of 40 meter fast paced walk test
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
A fast-paced walking test that is timed over 4 x 10m (33 ft) for a total 40 m (132 ft)
24, 60, 120 months
Change in results of stair climb test
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
The time (in seconds) it takes to ascend and descend a flight of stairs
24, 60, 120 months
Change in results of timed up and go test
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
Time (seconds) taken to rise from a chair, walk 3 m, turn, walk back to the chair, then sit down wearing regular footwear and using a walking aid if required.
24, 60, 120 months
Radiological progression of arthrosis
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
x-ray, MRI
24, 60, 120 months
Change in mechanical axis of lower limb
Time Frame: 12, 24, 60, 120 months
As measured from whole leg standing radiograph
12, 24, 60, 120 months
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: Up to 120 months
eg infection, non-union, thromboembolic complications etc.
Up to 120 months
Total costs of treatment
Time Frame: Up to 120 months
Including the cost of hospital treatment, physiotherapy, cost of medication, cost of sick leave
Up to 120 months
Incidence of reoperation
Time Frame: Up to 120 months
Amount of reoperations needed
Up to 120 months
Hyaluronic acid (HA) concentration
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months

At 24, 60 and 120 month follow-up blood and synovial fluid samples are analyzed for HA concentration.

This will be measured with antibody-ELISA at mg/g from 10µl of fluid. The same measurement will be conducted on blood serum.

24, 60, 120 months
Fatty acid (FA) profiling
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
At 24, 60 and 120 month follow-up blood and synovial fluid samples are analyzed for fatty acid (FA) profiling. FA will be analyzed from 75 µl of synovial fluid and 200 µl of blood serum with gas chromatography as mol-%.
24, 60, 120 months
Synovial fluid composition
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months

At 24, 60 and 120 month follow-up synovial fluid samples are analyzed for composition.

Synovial fluid composition will be assessed visually with confocal microscopy with a HA-biding fluorescent probe and Nile red probe that show both HA particles and the association of these particles on extracellular vesicles to assess the significance of vesicle-mediated HA secretion into synovial fluid.

24, 60, 120 months
General variables reflecting inflammatory status
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
At 24, 60 and 120 month follow-up blood and blood serum samples are analyzed for general variables reflecting inflammatory status (leucocytes, C-reactive protein, IL-6).
24, 60, 120 months
15D -quality of life assessement
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
The change of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument
24, 60, 120 months
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)
Time Frame: 24, 60, 120 months
The change of WPAI
24, 60, 120 months
Amount of national benefits received
Time Frame: Up to 120 months

The amount of benefits are gathered from:

  1. The hospital discharge register (maintained by National Institute for Health and Welfare)
  2. National benefits paid by The Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  3. Pension decision made by Finnish Centre for Pensions
Up to 120 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jussi Jalkanen, M.D., Kuopio University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on HTO

Subscribe