Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus Versus Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplantation (SEM)

April 20, 2023 updated by: Helio Tedesco Silva Junior, Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus, Everolimus or Mycophenolate in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Induction With Anti-thymocyte Globulin, Tacrolimus and Prednisone

This study was designed to compare 3 immunosuppression regimens: sirolimus and tacrolimus versus everolimus and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate and tacrolimus.

The primary outcome is the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection / disease, a relevant medical need in the absence of pharmacological prophylaxis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1209

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo
      • São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04038002
        • Hospital do Rim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Recipients, adults of the first living or deceased donor kidney transplant;
  2. Patients who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Receptors with a medical history of nephrotic syndrome or focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis confirmed as the etiology of end-stage renal disease;
  2. Receptors with poor understanding about chronic kidney disease and its treatment alternatives;
  3. Receptors with early history of non compliance to treatment with immunosuppressive drugs;
  4. Retransplantation;
  5. Multi-organ recipients;
  6. Recipients with BMI> 30 kg / m2;
  7. KDPI> 80%;
  8. Cold ischemia time greater than 24 hours;
  9. Receptors with a percentage of anti-HLA antibodies above 50%, either class I or Class II;
  10. Women of childbearing potential who do not undertake contraceptive methods (condoms or oral contraceptives).
  11. Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy prior to transplantation, except low dose of prednisone;
  12. Patients with severe uncontrolled dyslipidemia;
  13. Patients who have a known contraindication for administration of any of the immunosuppressive drugs provided for in this study;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sirolimus +tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,05 mg/kg BID oftacrolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 3-5 ng/mL. Initial dose of sirolimus of 3mg once a day to reach blood trough concentration between 4-8 ng/mL.
sirolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus
Other Names:
  • Rapamune
Experimental: everolimus +tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,05 mg/kg BID de tacrolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 3-5 ng/mL. Initial dose of 1.5 mg BID of everolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 4-8 ng/mL.
everolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus
Other Names:
  • Certican
Active Comparator: mycophenolate +tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,1 mg/kg BID de tacrolimusto reach blood trough concentration between Fixed dose of mycophenolate (mycophenolate mofetil, 1 g BID or sodium mycophenolate, 720 mg BID).
Control arm: mycophenolate combined to regular tacrolimus
Other Names:
  • mycophenolate sodium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease
Time Frame: 12 months follow up
Incidence of CMV infection/disease in three study groups (SRL, EVR anda MPS).
12 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplant Infection

Clinical Trials on Sirolimus

3
Subscribe