Treating Impulsivity in Adults With Probiotics (PROBIA)

Randomized Placebo-controlled Treatment of Impulsivity in Adults With Probiotics

A multicentre randomized double-blind placebo controlled parallel design (10 weeks) study investigating probiotic supplementation in highly impulsive adults (18-65 yrs; N=180). The probiotic studied is Synbiotic2000Forte that contain three well-studied anti-inflammatory lactic acid bacteria (LABs) and four fermentable fibers: Pediococcus pentosaceus 5-33:3, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei 19, and Lactobacillus plantarum 2362 in combination with the following four fermentable fibres: betaglucan, inulin, pectin and resistant starch. With this study we aim to detect, whether treatment with probiotics is effective in adults with high levels of impulsivity, compulsivity, and aggression.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: ADHD; Impulsive Behavior; Borderline Personality Disorder; Compulsive Disorder
• Intervention / Treatment: Dietary supplement: Treatment with a probiotic; Other: Treatment with placebo

Detailed Description

Impulsivity is a cross-disorder trait relevant in several psychiatric disorders, e.g. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). They place a significant burden on patients, families and society in general. Only adults (aged 18 - 65 years) with a diagnosis of ADHD and/or BPD will be included in this study. We will also try to include at least 30% female participants to gender-balance the study.

Recruitment and treatment of participants will be provided at three trial centres: Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Goethe University Frankfurt (GU), Semmelweis University (SU), each enrolling 60 participants. Randomization to receive either Synbiotic2000Forte or placebo will be performed when signed informed assent by the participant has been obtained, eligibility checks have been conducted and at baseline assessment. An independent randomization service (www.randomization.com) will be used to ensure reliability and credibility in the randomization process. The study is double-blinded; neither the participants nor the clinicians involved in the study will have access to the randomization list.

In this placebo-controlled 10-week, we will evaluate a probiotic formula for oral administration called Synbiotic2000Forte (SF). Participants will take the probiotic once daily in the form of a powder that can be spread on top of cold foods such as muesli, salad, or yoghurt. Placebo will be a non-digestable carbohydrate with similar texture and flavor to the SF. Participants will be assessed at baseline before treatment is started (baseline demographics and primary- and secondary outcome measures will be collected and then monitored every five weeks for a total of 5 visits.

Proper conduct of data collection in the trial will be monitored by on-site visits of a monitoring staff throughout the study, and quality of data collected will further be monitored regularly by a statistical supervision team. Questionnaire data will be collected through Castor. All information collected in this study will remain strictly confidential. Data of participants will be coded in such a way that participants cannot be identified from the corresponding data according to the regulations (unique pseudocode identifier).

This study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, version of 2008 and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO, as well as according to the ICH GCP Guideline E6 (1996), EU Directive 2001/20/EC and applicable regulatory requirements and guidelines in the participating countries/regions. Before the first subject has been enrolled in the trial, all ethical and legal requirements were met.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 180
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Germany
  • Frankfurt, Germany, 60528
    • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt - Goethe Universität
• Hungary
  • Budapest, Hungary, 1082
    • Semmelweis University
• Spain
  • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
    • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adults with a high level of impulsivity (with or without ADHD) based on a CGI-S-score ≥ 4.
• An Affective Reactivity Index (ARI) score ≥5 indicating a high level of multi dimensional impulsivity.
• Research diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or borderline personality disorder (BPD) confirmed by structured diagnostic interview according to DSM-5 (ADHD: Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD (DIVA 2.0); BPD: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-II)).
• Not currently taking any antibiotics or probiotics.
• Deemed reliable and compliant with the protocol by the investigator.
• Ability to speak and comprehend the native language of the country in which the assessments take place.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subject is being treated with a concomitant medication which is prohibited within this study according to the list of prohibited medications.
• Patients must be on stable medication (i.e. current dose is given since more than 30 days): up-titration is not allowed and careful clinical screening is done at all visits to check whether lower dosage is needed due to increased side effects as a result of treatment with Synbiotic2000Forte.
• Presence of major psychiatric disorders with psychotic's symptoms.
• Neurological disorder involving brain or other central function (e.g., intellectual disability with an assessed IQ < 70, epilepsy, MS, narcolepsy) or other major psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization (e.g., significant mood disorder or psychosis).
• Major physical illness of the cardiovascular, endocrine, pulmonal, or the gastrointestinal system.
• History of or present clinically relevant somatic acute or chronic disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of tolerability/safety assessment, or prohibit the patients from completing the study, or would not be in the best interest of the patient.
• Subject has a documented allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to any of the ingredients of the intervention.
• Subject has taken another investigational product or taken part in a clinical study within 30 days prior to entering the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment with a probiotic; Synbiotic2000Forte (SF) it is composed of 3 LAB species known to have anti-inflammatory effects and restoring the intestinal barrier, and 4 fermentable fibers: Pediococcus pentosaceus 5-33:3, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp paracasei 19, and Lactobacillus plantarum 2362 in combination with the following four fermentable fibres: betaglucan, inulin, pectin and resistant starch, a formula that is currently produced by Synbiotic AB, Sweden.	Dietary supplement: Treatment with a probiotic; All participants will take the probiotic once daily for 10 weeks in the form of a powder that can be spread on top of cold foods such as muesli, salad, or yogurt.
Placebo Comparator: Treatment with placebo powder; Placebo will be a non-digestable carbohydrate with similar texture and flavor to the SF also provided by Synbiotic AB, Sweden.	Other: Treatment with placebo; All participants will take the placebo once daily for 10 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Change in the self-rating of affective reactivity (ARI-S)	Assessed at Baseline, at week 5, week 10 and week 11.
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) total score of 1 or 2 (much improved, very much improved).	assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 11.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S)		Screnning assessment and again at weeks 1, 5 and 10.
Change in ADHD symptom severity total score	assessed by the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The ADHD-RS is a 18-items scale self-report version for assessing symptoms for ADHD DSM-IV. It consists of a subscale of inattention (IN, 9-items), another of hyperactivity/impulsivity (H / I, 9-items) and the total (TOT, 18-items). The interviewees are asked about the frequency of the symptoms over the past 6 months. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 points, and the highest scores indicates more severe symptomatology of ADHD.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in impulsive behaviour	assessed by the self-rated multi-dimensional impulsivity (UPPS-P)	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in Self/other rating of aggression and emotional lability (SDQ)		Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in Clinician rating of compulsivity (Y-BOCS)		Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in sleep problems	5-item questionnaire.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in the somatic complaints and side effects describe by the patient.		assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 11.
Change in body composition parameters	Change in weight in kilograms	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Changes in concentrations of blood biomarkers including hormones, neurotransmitters and nutrients.		Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in microbiome composition		Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in nutritional intake	Participants will be asked to complete at least three 24-h dietary recall (24HDR) per visit, including two week days and one weekend day (non-consecutive days).	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Treatment adherence	Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS); The total score ranges from 0-18 with a higher score indicating better adherence. Each item is scored as yes (1) or No (0).	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in functioning problems	Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST )	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Self-rating of emotion regulation difficulties	assessed by Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16). The total score ranges from 16-80 with a higher score indicating higher difficulties in emotion regulation. Each item is scored as Almost never (1), Somtimes (2), About half the time (3), Most of the time (4), Almost always (5).	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, and 10.
Change in gastrointestinal symptoms	assessed by Bristol Stool Scale; There are seven types of stool in the Bristol Stool Scale: Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (difficult to pass and can be black); Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy; Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface (can be black); Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (average stool); Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges; Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool (diarrhoea); Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid (diarrhoea) Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 being the ideal stools as they are easy to defecate while not containing excess liquid, 5 indicating lack of dietary fiber, and 6 and 7 indicate diarrhoea.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5, 10, and 11.
Change in physical activity: Duration of the activity	parameter measured with a movement sensor.The actigraphy records the duration of the activity. The activity report outcomes how long the participant move (days/hours/min).	Baseline assessment and at week 10.
Change in physical activity: Intensity of the activity	parameter measured with a movement sensor. The actigraphy records the intensity of the activity. The report of activity outcomes the intensity of the movement classified in four categories from lowest intensity to highest intensity; these categories are: sedentary; light; moderate; vigorous	Baseline assessment and at week 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Detectability	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Detectability (d'): this is a measure of how well the respondent discriminates non-targets (i.e. the letter X) from targets (i.e. all the other letters). This variable is also a signal detection statistic that measures the difference between the signal (targets) and noise (non-targets) distributions. On the Conners CPT-II, d' is reverse scored so that higher raw score and T-score values indicate worse performance (i.e. poorer discrimination)	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Omissions	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Omissions (%): Omissions are missed targets. High omissions error rates indicate that the respondent was not responding to the target stimuli due to a specific reason (e.g. difficulty focusing). Omission errors are generally an indicator of inattentiveness.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Commissions	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Commissions (%): Commissions are incorrect responses to non-targets. Depending on the respondent's HRT, high commission error rates may indicate either inattentiveness or impulsivity. If high commission error rates are coupled with slow reaction times, then the respondent was likely inattentive to the stimulus type being presented and thus responded to a high rate of non-targets. If high commission error rates are combined with fast reaction times, the respondent was likely rushing to respond and failed to control his or her impulses when responding to the non-targets. In the latter case, high commission error rates would reflect impulsivity rather than inattentiveness.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Perseverations	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Perseverations (%): Perseverations are responses that are made in less than 100 milliseconds following the presentation of a stimulus. Normal expectations of physiological ability to respond make it virtually impossible for a respondent to perceive and react to a stimulus so quickly. Perseverations are unusually either slow responses to a preceding stimulus, a random response, an anticipatory response, or a repeated response without consideration of the task requirements. Perseverations may be related to impulsivity or an extremely liberal response style. Perseverations are, therefore, likely the result of anticipatory, repetitive, or impulsive responding.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Hit Reaction Time (HRT)	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Hit Reaction Time (HRT): HRT is the mean response speed, measured in milliseconds, for all non-perseverative responses made during the entire administration. An atypically slow HRT may indicate inattentiveness (especially when error rates are high), but it may also be the results of a very conservative response style. Alternatively, a very fast HRT, when combined with high commission error rates, may indicate impulsivity.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT SD)	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. . Physicological parameter assessed: - Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT SD): HRT SD measures the consistency of response speed to targets for the entire administration. A high HRT SD indicates greater inconsistency in response speed. Response speed inconsistency is sometimes indicative of an inattentiveness, suggesting that the respondent was less engaged and processed stimuli less efficiently during some parts of the administration.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in neurocognitive measure: Variability	assessed by Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPTII). Assessment duration: 14min. Physicological parameter assessed: - Variability: Variability, like HRT SD, is a measure of response speed consistency, however, Variability is a "within respondent" measure (i.e. the amount of variability the respondent showed in 18 separate sub-blocks of the administration in relation to his or her overall HRT SD score). Although Variability is a different measure than HRT SD, the two measures typically produce comparable results and are both related to inattentiveness. High response speed variability indicates that the respondent's attention and processing efficiency varied throughout the administration.	Baseline assessment and again at weeks 5 and 10.
Change in self-rating of perceived stress. The total score ranges from 0-40 with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress. Each item is scored as Never (0), Almost never (1), Sometimes (2), Fairly Often (3), Very Often (4).	assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)	Baseline assessment and at week 10.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Hospital Vall d'Hebron
• Collaborators: Semmelweis University; University Medical Center Nijmegen; University Hospital Frankfurt

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Stoffers-Winterling JM, Storebo OJ, Pereira Ribeiro J, Kongerslev MT, Vollm BA, Mattivi JT, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Jorgensen MS, Callesen HE, Sales CP, Schaug JP, Simonsen E, Lieb K. Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.
• Arteaga-Henriquez G, Rosales-Ortiz SK, Arias-Vasquez A, Bitter I, Ginsberg Y, Ibanez-Jimenez P, Kilencz T, Lavebratt C, Matura S, Reif A, Rethelyi J, Richarte V, Rommelse N, Siegl A, Ramos-Quiroga JA. Treating impulsivity with probiotics in adults (PROBIA): study protocol of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4040-x.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 22, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 20, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): May 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 26, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 4, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 3, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 2, 2022
• Last Verified: August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Microbiome; Nutrition; Impulsivity; Aggression; Probiotic; Psychiatric disorders; Compulsivity; Synbiotic2000Forte
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Pathologic Processes; Personality Disorders; Disease; Borderline Personality Disorder; Impulsive Behavior
• Other Study ID Numbers: HValldhebron

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No