Evaluation of the Performance of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in CT Enterography

August 22, 2018 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Evaluation of the Performance of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in CT Enterography (CTE)

CT enterography has become an important tool in the evaluation of small bowel diseases, especially in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. There are several shortcomings of commonly used isotonic mannitol as an oral contrast agent, such as incident adverse reactions and gases in the gut. However, polyethylene glycol can avoid these drawbacks with a good performance in some pilot experiments.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged from 18 to 75
  • patients undergoing CT enterography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with a history of colorectal surgery
  • patients with severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
  • patients with significant gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction
  • patients with known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
  • patients with severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance<30 ml/min)
  • patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure>100 mm Hg)
  • patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease or megacolon
  • patients with documented allergy to intravascular contrast agent
  • patients with dehydration
  • patients with pregnancy or lactation
  • patients hemodynamically unstable
  • patients with dysphagia
  • patients with severe constipation.
  • patients unable to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: mannitol
Participants are given a minimum of 1500 mL of a preparation of mannitol as oral contrast agent over an hour prior to the examination.
Active comparator group was given mannitol as oral contrast agent.
Experimental: polyethylene glycol
Participants are given a minimum of 1500 mL of a preparation of polyethylene glycol as oral contrast agent over an hour prior to the examination.
Experimental group was given polyethylene glycol as oral contrast agent.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in CT enterography.
Time Frame: 12 months

The assessment system includes six parts.

  1. Whether the contrast reached the caecum is evaluate and recorded as 'yes' or 'no'.
  2. The overall presence of inhomogeneous contrast is evaluated and recorded as 'yes' or 'no'.
  3. The maximum dimension of a single loop in each quadrant was recorded.
  4. The scale of loops of small bowel distended ≥2 cm are evaluated and recorded as '0-25%', '26-50%', '51-75%' and '76-100%'.
  5. The wall visibility and visualization of the small-bowel mucosal are scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4, in which a higher score represents a better outcome.
  6. Overall quality is assessed subjectively by the radiologist and scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 4, in which a higher score represents a better outcome.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects of the two oral contrast agents.
Time Frame: 12 months
The degree of nausea, emesis, diarrhea, abdominal distension and cramp following ingestion are scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, in which a higher score represents a higher level of these targets.
12 months
The flavor, volume and participants' willing for the second use of the two oral contrast agents in CT enterography.
Time Frame: 12 months
The flavor, volume and participants' willing for the second use are scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, in which a higher score represents a better outcome.
12 months
Dizziness and debilitation of patients.
Time Frame: 12 months
The presence of dizziness and debilitation are recorded as 'yes' or 'no'.
12 months
Temperature of patients.
Time Frame: 12 months
The temperature of patients are recorded in degree centigrade.
12 months
Blood pressure of patients.
Time Frame: 12 months
The blood pressure of patients are recorded in millimeter of mercury.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yanqing Li, PhD, MD, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018SDU-QILU-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CTE

Clinical Trials on mannitol

Subscribe