Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency and Median Ulnar F Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

April 13, 2018 updated by: ASLIHAN UZUNKULAOGLU

Role of Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency and Median Ulnar F Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Terminal latency index, residual latency and median ulnar F latency difference in carpal tunnel syndrome are specific parameters for the diagnosis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compression neuropathy. This study was performed to determine the value of terminal latency index, residual latency and median ulnar F latency difference to investigate their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of this syndrome.

We retrospectively determined the 160 patients. We evaluated the nerve conduction studies of patient and healthy arms. We recorded all nerve conduction study values.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who had gone to electrodiagnostic study and diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had gone to electrodiagnostic study and diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any history of hereditary polyneuropathies
  • acquired polyneuropathies
  • surgery or local steroid injections for upper limbs or effect the study
  • any history of fracture at the sites of stimulation or recording

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1
affected arms of patients who had gone to electrodiagnostic study and diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome
nerve conduction study
2
healthy arms of patients who had gone to electrodiagnostic study and diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome in the other arms
nerve conduction study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
nerve conduction studies
Time Frame: one month
one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 2, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on nerve conduction study

3
Subscribe