Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center (Marche_15)

September 29, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The principal objective of this study is to determine if the provision of a treadmill workstation in an emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch center increases the number of steps that participants make daily within 6 months compared to the usual working conditions.

The investigators hypothesized that the provision of a treadmill workstation with a slow walking could increase the number of daily steps and decrease days of leave, musculoskeletal disorders without decreasing the dispatch quality.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Sedentariness, measured by the daily duration of time spent seated is a cardiovascular risk factor, chronic pathologies (cancer, musculoskeletal pain) and mortality.

The employees who remain seated from 8 to 11 hours per day have an increase risk of death within 3 years (15%). This increase reaches 40% for more than 11 hours a day.

The restoration of a daily moderate physical activity from 60 to 75 minutes could permit to eliminate this increased risk.

Interventions in workplace to limit sitting are associated with a metabolic benefit, but also with a reduction in musculoskeletal problems and fatigue.

The role of dispatchers is to initiate the medical record by determining the severity of the call and take rapid and adequate decision.

They are seated behind their desks from 8 to 11 hours in a busy and stressful environment.

Many dispatchers are complaining of musculoskeletal disorders and weight gain. An internal study conducted between between 2012 and 2016 showed an increase in long-term pain, irritability and sleep disorders. Overall, 65% of the respondents reported that they were tired at work and had less empathy.

The use of workstations with low-speed treadmills were assessed to allow physical activity at work.

A recent review concluded that their use reduced the time that the employees spent seated, stress and improved energy expenditure, as well as different biological and physical parameters (weight loss, lipid determination, glycaemia). This study did not reveal any alterations in performance at work.

The investigators assume that the establishment of a position allowing slow walk during dispatch call would increase the number of steps made by dispatchers on a daily basis and reduce the number of days of leave and musculoskeletal disorders, without impairing the quality of call pick-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France
        • University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dispatchers working in Emergency Medical Service

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Inability to walk

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group

During the randomized study phase (6 months),subjects will perform their usual activity without access to the treadmill workstation in the dispatch center.

After six months, all subjects will continue to be assessed with free access to the treadmill workstation at the workplace.

Experimental: Experimental Group

During the randomized study phase, subjects will have an open access to the treadmill workstation with the indication to use it for at least one hour (continuous or split) on working days.

After six months, all subjects will continue to be assessed with free access to the treadmill workstation.

During the randomized study phase, provision of the treadmill workstation with the recommendation to use it for at least one hour (continuous or split) during each of the working shifts.

After six months, all subjects will use treadmill without restrictions or conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference of number of steps at 0 and 6 months
Time Frame: 0 and 6 months

Number of daily steps measured by actimetry (including all walking activities measured over a day).

Measurements will be done with actimetry during one week before the randomization and at 6 months

0 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Quality of life
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Assessment of quality of life with the validated Short Form Health Survey assessment SF-36
0, 6 and 12 months
Evaluation of Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months

Assessment of anxiety depression with the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score.

This questionnaire helps your physician to know how the patient is feeling.

0, 6 and 12 months
Change in blood pressure
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Assessment of blood pressure every month
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Change in heart rate
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Assessment of heart rate every month
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Change in Weight
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Assessment of weight every month
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Assessment of musculoskeletal disorders
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Assessment with the validated Standardised Nordic Questionnaire
0, 6 and 12 months
Evaluation of non-attendance at work
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Number of workdays not realised during the month
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Job performance evaluation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months

Assessment with the Likert scale (7-points scale) Level of Performance - 7 point 0 - Not at all performant

  1. - Low performant
  2. - Slightly performant
  3. - Neutral
  4. - Moderately performant
  5. - Very performant
  6. - Extremely performant
0, 6 and 12 months
Work satisfaction evaluation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months

Assessment with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (7-points scale). Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 0 - Completely dissatisfied

  1. - Mostly dissatisfied
  2. - Somewhat dissatisfied
  3. - neither satisfied or dissatisfied
  4. - Somewhat satisfied
  5. - Mostly satisfied
  6. - Completely satisfied
0, 6 and 12 months
Assessment of sleep quality
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
Assessment with the Pittsburgh Quality Index survey
0, 6 and 12 months
Evaluation of tobacco consumption
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Mean of packs of smoked cigarettes during the week before the evaluation. This evaluation is based on a declared and quantitative consumption.
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Evaluation of pickup calls quality
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months

Calls are evaluated according to the following criteria:

  • Presentation of the volunteer at the picked up of the call
  • Audio quality
  • Listening of the patient request
  • Empathy
  • Relevance of the call sort
  • Management of the end of communication
  • Call duration
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Walking period during a working day
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
Evaluation of walking time on the treadmill with the integrated software
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guillaume Debaty, MD, PhD, CHU Grenoble Alpes, SAMU38

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Marche pour le 15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work-Related Condition

Clinical Trials on Use of the treadmill workstation at work

Subscribe