- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03507764
Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center (Marche_15)
Evaluation of a Treadmill Workstation in an Emergency Dispatch Center. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
The principal objective of this study is to determine if the provision of a treadmill workstation in an emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch center increases the number of steps that participants make daily within 6 months compared to the usual working conditions.
The investigators hypothesized that the provision of a treadmill workstation with a slow walking could increase the number of daily steps and decrease days of leave, musculoskeletal disorders without decreasing the dispatch quality.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Sedentariness, measured by the daily duration of time spent seated is a cardiovascular risk factor, chronic pathologies (cancer, musculoskeletal pain) and mortality.
The employees who remain seated from 8 to 11 hours per day have an increase risk of death within 3 years (15%). This increase reaches 40% for more than 11 hours a day.
The restoration of a daily moderate physical activity from 60 to 75 minutes could permit to eliminate this increased risk.
Interventions in workplace to limit sitting are associated with a metabolic benefit, but also with a reduction in musculoskeletal problems and fatigue.
The role of dispatchers is to initiate the medical record by determining the severity of the call and take rapid and adequate decision.
They are seated behind their desks from 8 to 11 hours in a busy and stressful environment.
Many dispatchers are complaining of musculoskeletal disorders and weight gain. An internal study conducted between between 2012 and 2016 showed an increase in long-term pain, irritability and sleep disorders. Overall, 65% of the respondents reported that they were tired at work and had less empathy.
The use of workstations with low-speed treadmills were assessed to allow physical activity at work.
A recent review concluded that their use reduced the time that the employees spent seated, stress and improved energy expenditure, as well as different biological and physical parameters (weight loss, lipid determination, glycaemia). This study did not reveal any alterations in performance at work.
The investigators assume that the establishment of a position allowing slow walk during dispatch call would increase the number of steps made by dispatchers on a daily basis and reduce the number of days of leave and musculoskeletal disorders, without impairing the quality of call pick-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Grenoble, France
- University Hospital Grenoble
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Dispatchers working in Emergency Medical Service
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women
- Inability to walk
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
During the randomized study phase (6 months),subjects will perform their usual activity without access to the treadmill workstation in the dispatch center. After six months, all subjects will continue to be assessed with free access to the treadmill workstation at the workplace. |
|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group
During the randomized study phase, subjects will have an open access to the treadmill workstation with the indication to use it for at least one hour (continuous or split) on working days. After six months, all subjects will continue to be assessed with free access to the treadmill workstation. |
During the randomized study phase, provision of the treadmill workstation with the recommendation to use it for at least one hour (continuous or split) during each of the working shifts. After six months, all subjects will use treadmill without restrictions or conditions. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference of number of steps at 0 and 6 months
Time Frame: 0 and 6 months
|
Number of daily steps measured by actimetry (including all walking activities measured over a day). Measurements will be done with actimetry during one week before the randomization and at 6 months |
0 and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Quality of life
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment of quality of life with the validated Short Form Health Survey assessment SF-36
|
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Evaluation of Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment of anxiety depression with the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score. This questionnaire helps your physician to know how the patient is feeling. |
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Change in blood pressure
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Assessment of blood pressure every month
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Change in heart rate
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Assessment of heart rate every month
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Change in Weight
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Assessment of weight every month
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Assessment of musculoskeletal disorders
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment with the validated Standardised Nordic Questionnaire
|
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Evaluation of non-attendance at work
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Number of workdays not realised during the month
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Job performance evaluation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment with the Likert scale (7-points scale) Level of Performance - 7 point 0 - Not at all performant
|
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Work satisfaction evaluation
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (7-points scale). Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 0 - Completely dissatisfied
|
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Assessment of sleep quality
Time Frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
|
Assessment with the Pittsburgh Quality Index survey
|
0, 6 and 12 months
|
|
Evaluation of tobacco consumption
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Mean of packs of smoked cigarettes during the week before the evaluation.
This evaluation is based on a declared and quantitative consumption.
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Evaluation of pickup calls quality
Time Frame: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Calls are evaluated according to the following criteria:
|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
|
Walking period during a working day
Time Frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Evaluation of walking time on the treadmill with the integrated software
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Guillaume Debaty, MD, PhD, CHU Grenoble Alpes, SAMU38
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Marche pour le 15
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Work-Related Condition
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityRecruitingWork-Related ConditionTurkey
-
Regional Hospital West JutlandAarhus University Hospital Skejby; University of Aarhus; Aalborg University HospitalActive, not recruitingWork-Related ConditionDenmark
-
University Hospital, AngersOrtec InternationalWithdrawnWork-Related ConditionFrance
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedWork-Related ConditionUnited States
-
Trakya UniversityUnknownWork-Related Condition
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruiting
-
Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthTampere University; University of Oulu; University Hospital of Cologne; Academy...UnknownHealth Behavior | Work Ability | Intervention | Work-Related ConditionFinland
-
Jonkoping UniversityCompletedBlood Pressure | Work-Related ConditionSweden
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruitingNurse's Role | Educational Problems | Work-Related ConditionEgypt
Clinical Trials on Use of the treadmill workstation at work
-
Klein Buendel, Inc.National Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
MarsiBionicsFundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon...CompletedSpinal Muscular Atrophy Type IISpain
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenRigshospitalet, Denmark; The Novo Nordic Foundation; Region Capital Denmark; VIVE... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationCross-sectorial Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Degenerative Shoulder Conditions (C-PRO)Shoulder Impingement Syndrome | Shoulder Osteoarthritis | Shoulder Capsulitis | Shoulder Impingement | Shoulder Bursitis | Shoulder Disease | Rotator Cuff Syndrome | Rotator Cuff Syndrome of Shoulder and Allied Disorders | Shoulder FrozenDenmark
-
University of NottinghamMonash University; University of Salford; University of Exeter; University of Aberdeen and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic
-
University Hospital, ToursCompletedQuality of Work Life of Psychiatric Nurses | Impact on Quality of Care
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterGama Healthcare Ltd.CompletedHospital Acquired InfectionIsrael
-
University Hospital, ToulouseRecruitingStroke | RéhabilitationFrance
-
University of Roma La SapienzaActive, not recruitingGingivitis | Oral Health | Gum DiseaseItaly
-
Ariel UniversityMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelRecruitingAttention Deficit DisorderIsrael
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted