- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03524664
A Study of Parent and Child Emotions in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)
Parent Emotion Socialization and Child Emotion Regulation in FASD
The purpose of this study is to learn about the emotion regulation skills of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) and different strategies that may improve these skills. This study is also testing whether a training program taught to caregivers is helpful.
Children will be asked to:
- Complete a brief measure of verbal and nonverbal problem-solving skills.
- Play two computer games.
- Have their heart rate measured while completing a task that is designed to be mildly disappointing. Two ECG pads are placed on the chest with a small recorder.
- Play or relax with study staff while you are finishing caregiver activities.
Caregivers will be asked to complete interviews and questionnaires about:
- the child's background, including any past stressful experiences
- the child's behavior and how s/he handles emotions
- caregiver views on the child's emotions and their own
- caregiver relationship with the child
- Stress caregivers experience as a parent
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) have high rates of mental health problems and incur physical and mental health expenditures that are 9 times higher than other children. These mental health problems contribute to poor social adjustment for children with FASD and result in considerable emotional and financial burden for families. Emotion regulation is a core area of impairment in FASD and is implicated in most mental health disorders. Research on empirically validated interventions for children with FASD is limited. Results from two interventions targeting emotion regulation in FASD demonstrate that child-focused interventions are insufficient to habilitate children's emotion regulation to adaptive levels. Research is needed to identify alternate targets for intervention (e.g., parent training, environmental modifications) to improve the emotion regulation difficulties of children with FASD.
This study investigates a novel intervention target to improve the emotion regulation and adaptive functioning of children with FASD. Research with other populations provides ample evidence for the impact of parent emotion socialization on the development of child emotion regulation and other outcomes. In addition, studies demonstrate that parent emotion socialization is amendable to intervention and results in improved child and parent outcomes. However, no studies have investigated the emotion socialization practices utilized by parents of children with FASD or whether interventions targeting parent emotion socialization result in improved child emotion regulation and behavior in this population.
This study will address this critical gap by initiating an empirical test of a promising emotion-focused intervention, Tuning In To Kids (TIK), with families raising children with FASD. Results from this initial efficacy trial will determine whether parent emotion socialization is a promising intervention target for this population. Consistent with a developmental psychopathology perspective, multi-level data from the efficacy trial will be leveraged to test theorized associations between parent emotion socialization and child emotion regulation and identify possible factors contributing to individual differences. These results will inform possible intervention adaptations for this population and provide the necessary foundation for larger-scale efficacy trials. The long-term goals of this research are to better understand the complex factors influencing emotion regulation in children with FASD and improve mental health interventions and outcomes for this population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14608
- Mt. Hope Family Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Families will be eligible for the study if they:
- Have a child between the age of 4 and 12 with a formal diagnosis of an FASD based on the Revised 2016 Hoyme criteria (Hoyme et al., 2016)
- The child is in some form of out of home care (e.g., adoptive, foster, relative, or other legal guardian)
- The child has resided with the primary caregiver for at least a year and be expected to remain in that placement for at least 6 months (study duration).
Exclusion Criteria:
- A history of other genetic, neurological, or significant medical conditions, traumatic brain injury, serious psychiatric illness or disability that would preclude data collection
- Child has a moderate to severe intellectual disability (IQ < 55)
- Child or caregiver has insufficient proficiency in English
- Caregiver is a biological parent of the child with FASD
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: Delayed "tuning in to kids" intervention
Children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and their parents
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: "Tuning in to kids" intervention
Children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and their parents
|
The Tuning Into Kids Program involves:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Parent Awareness of Own Emotion Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent awareness sub-scale for sadness includes 9 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 9 to 45.
A higher score reflects greater parental awareness of their sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Acceptance of Own Expression Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent acceptance of expressivity sub-scale for sadness includes 8 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 8 to 40.
A higher score reflects greater acceptance of emotion expression for sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Regulation of Own Emotions Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent sub-scale for regulation of their own sadness includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects better parent regulation of their sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Awareness of Child Emotion Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent awareness of child's sadness sub-scale includes 8 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 8 to 40.
A higher score reflects greater parental awareness of their child's sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Acceptance of Child's Emotion Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent acceptance of their child's sadness sub-scale includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects greater acceptance of their child's sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Emotion Coaching Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent emotion coaching sub-scale for sadness includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects greater use of emotion coaching when their child is sad.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Child Regulation Score for Sadness at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The child regulation sub-scale for sadness includes 7 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 7 to 35.
A higher score reflects better child regulation of sadness.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Awareness of Own Emotion Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent awareness sub-scale for anger includes 9 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 9 to 45.
A higher score reflects greater parental awareness of their own anger.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Acceptance of Own Expression Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent acceptance of their anger expression sub-scale includes 8 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 8 to 40.
A higher score reflects greater parental acceptance of their own anger expression.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Regulation of Own Emotions Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent regulation sub-scale for anger includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects better parental regulation of their own anger.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Awareness of Child Emotion Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent awareness of their child's anger sub-scale includes 8 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 8 to 40.
A higher score reflects greater awareness of their child's anger.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Acceptance of Child's Emotion Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent acceptance of their child's anger sub-scale includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects greater parental acceptance of their child's anger.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Parent Emotion Coaching Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The parent emotion coaching sub-scale for anger includes 6 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 6 to 30.
A higher score reflects greater use of emotion coaching of the child's anger.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Child Regulation Score for Anger at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The meta emotion interview is a semi-structured interview administered to parents about their own experience of anger and sadness and their feelings, attitudes, and behaviors toward their children's anger and sadness.
Interviews can be analyzed quantitatively using a checklist rating system.
The Revised Meta-Emotion coding system uses a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree) with which coders rate each item based on both the content and the way parents talk about emotions.
The child regulation sub-scale for anger includes 7 items; sub-scale score is a sum of items with a total range of 7 to 35.
A higher score reflects better child emotion regulation.
|
baseline to post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Proportion of Observed Emotion Coaching Statements Using the Family Narrative Task at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The Family Narrative Task is a parent-child interaction task assessing how parents communicate about emotions with their children.
Parents are instructed to engage the child in a conversation about three emotional events in turn: a positive family experience, a difficult family experience, and a time when the child misbehaved.
Interactions are videotaped and coded for content and function using the Family Emotion Communication Scoring System, Revised.
Emotion coaching (e.g., "I could tell you were mad because you walked away," "How did you feel when that happened?")
and dismissing (e.g., "It wasn't anything to get upset over," abrupt change in topic) is coded.
The proportion of emotion coaching statements across all three scenarios made versus total statements is calculated.
Higher scores reflect greater proportion of emotion coaching statements made.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Proportion of Observed Emotion Dismissing Statements Using the Family Narrative Task at Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention (8 Weeks)
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
The Family Narrative Task is a parent-child interaction task assessing how parents communicate about emotions with their children.
Parents are instructed to engage the child in a conversation about three emotional events in turn: a positive family experience, a difficult family experience, and a time when the child misbehaved.
Interactions are videotaped and coded for content and function using the Family Emotion Communication Scoring System, Revised.
Emotion coaching (e.g., "I could tell you were mad because you walked away," "How did you feel when that happened?")
and dismissing (e.g., "It wasn't anything to get upset over," abrupt change in topic) is coded.
The proportion of emotion dismissing statements across all three scenarios versus total statements is calculated, with higher proportions reflecting more use of emotion dismissing statements.
|
baseline to immediate post-intervention (8 weeks)
|
Child Emotion Regulation Using the Emotion Regulation Checklist at Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, and 3-month Post-intervention Follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
The Emotion Regulation Checklist is a 24-item parent report questionnaire assessing children's affect lability (e.g., "exhibits wide mood swings," "is easily frustrated") and emotion regulation (e.g., "is empathetic towards others," "can say when s/he is feeling sad, angry, fearful, or afraid").
This assessment is 24 items rated by the parent on a 4 point scale of never to always given at baseline, 8 and 20 weeks.
There are 12 items of lability and 12 items of emotion regulation.
Items are summed for each sub-scale.
For the emotion regulation sub-scale the score ranges from 12-48 with higher scores reflecting better emotion regulation.
|
baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
Child Lability/Negativity Using the Emotion Regulation Checklist at Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, and 3-month Post-intervention Follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
The Emotion Regulation Checklist is a 24-item parent report questionnaire assessing children's affect lability (e.g., "exhibits wide mood swings," "is easily frustrated") and emotion regulation (e.g., "is empathetic towards others," "can say when s/he is feeling sad, angry, fearful, or afraid").
This assessment is 24 items rated by the parent on a 4 point scale of never to always given at baseline, 8 and 20 weeks.
There are 12 items of lability and 12 items of emotion regulation.
Item scores are summed for each sub-scale.
For the lability/negativity sub-scale, the score ranges from 12-48 with higher scores reflecting worse lability/negativity.
|
baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
Intensity of Disruptive Behaviors Using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory at Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, and 3-month Post-intervention Follow-up
Time Frame: baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory is a 36-item scale assessing the intensity of disruptive behaviors in children.
Parents rate each item on a 7 point scale.
This is then converted into a standardized score with a "T-score" with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Higher scores reflecting more problems.
This is given at baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month post-intervention follow-up.
Scores are considered clinically elevated when T>60.
|
baseline, immediate post-intervention (8 weeks), 3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RSRB69545
- R34AA025717 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
-
University of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia; Provincial Health Services Authority; Glenrose... and other collaboratorsCompletedSelf-regulation | Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder | AdolescentsCanada
-
University of ManitobaCompletedFetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder | Attachment DisordersCanada
-
IWK Health CentreCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Queen's University; Public Health... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Nova Southeastern UniversityCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedAlcohol Consumption | Students | Fetal Alcohol Syndrome DisordersUnited States
-
University of AlbertaCompleted
-
Parc de Salut MarFundación Mutua MadrileñaCompletedFetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS)Spain
-
University of MinnesotaNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedFetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders | Prenatal Alcohol Exposure | Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | Partial Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental DisorderUnited States
-
San Diego State UniversityCompletedFetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders | Prenatal Alcohol Exposure | Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | Partial Fetal Alcohol Syndrome | Alcohol-related Neurodevelopmental DisorderUnited States
-
University Hospital, RouenRecruitingFetal Alcohol SyndromeFrance
-
Northwestern UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Tuning In to kids intervention
-
University of OsloActive, not recruitingParent and Child Emotional Intelligence and Child Self-regulationNorway
-
University of OsloActive, not recruiting
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedADHD | Emotion Regulation | Parenting InterventionHong Kong
-
University of OsloCompleted
-
University Hospital, AkershusUniversity of Oslo; University of Melbourne; ExtrastiftelsenTerminated
-
St. Jude Children's Research HospitalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Not yet recruitingSickle Cell DiseaseUnited States
-
Oregon Social Learning CenterU.S. Department of EducationCompletedSchool ReadinessUnited States
-
Oregon Social Learning CenterNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute...Completed
-
Oregon Social Learning CenterU.S. Department of EducationCompleted
-
Université de MontréalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed