Macular Hole After Diabetic Vitrectomy

May 14, 2018 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital
To present the clinical characteristics and rational treatment of macular hole (MH) after the diabetic vitrectomy (DV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

All patients had received initial vitrectomy to treat complications of PDR. Recruited patients were divided to two groups: the persistent MH group, who had MH before the primary DV (group 1); and the newly-developed MH group, who developed MH after a successful primary DV (group 2). The patients' demographic data, records of ophthalmological examinations, and surgical procedures were collected, including best-corrected visual acuity before and after each operation, fundus changes, as well as MH repairing techniques. The extent of fibrovascular proliferation(FVP) was separated into four grades based on the severity of vitreoretinal adhesion : multiple-point adhesions with or without one site plaque-like broad adhesion (grade 1), broad adhesions in more than one but fewer than three sites, located posterior to the equator (grade 2), broad adhesions in more than three sites, located posterior to the equator or extending beyond the equator within one quadrant (grade 3), and broad adhesions extending beyond the equator for more than one quadrant (grade 4). The extent of retinal detachment (RD) was classified into "within the arcade" or "beyond the arcade". The macular structure was evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT). All patients had a follow-up duration of more than three months after the final surgical procedures.

Three different surgical techniques were used to treat MH: standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, inverted ILM flap insertion into the MH, and lens anterior or posterior capsular flap insertion into the MH. The indication(s) for each technique were:

standard ILM peeling was performed if no ILM peeling had been done in the previous surgery, and the MH size was less than 500um in an attached retina; inverted ILM flap insertion was performed if no ILM peeling had been done in the previous surgery, with a detached retina; lens anterior capsule flap insertion was performed if cataract surgery was performed in the same setting with no ILM tissue available; lens posterior capsule flap insertion was performed in a pseudophakic eye with no ILM tissue available. Only descriptive statistics was obtained.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from January 2010 to May 2017 treated by a single surgeon (Y.C.M) at National Taiwan University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients presenting with macular hole after primary diabetic vitrectomy
  • The persistent MH group after surgery, who had MH before the primary DV
  • Newly-developed MH group, who developed MH after a successful primary diabetic retinopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with peripheral breaks
  • Patients with macular hole before surgery, which closed after primary diabetic retinopathy
  • Missing clinical data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MH after diabetic pars plana vitrectomy
Recruited patients included, the persistent MH group, who had MH before the primary DV, and the newly-developed MH group, who developed MH after a successful primary DV
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with Internal limiting membrane peeling, inverted internal limiting membrane flap insertion into the macular hole, or lens anterior or posterior capsular flap insertion into the macular hole

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to macular hole closure
Time Frame: OCT was performed monthly after operation, until MH closure was achieved, up yo 1 year
Evaluation by optical coherence tomography
OCT was performed monthly after operation, until MH closure was achieved, up yo 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: One month after operation, and then the visual acuity was checked every six months. Up to 3.5 years.
Landolt C chart
One month after operation, and then the visual acuity was checked every six months. Up to 3.5 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chung-May Yang, MD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Pars plana vitrectomy

3
Subscribe