Physiotherapy of the Pelvic Floor in Women With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (endofisio-01)

June 11, 2019 updated by: Mohamed Mabrouk, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy in Symptomatic Patients Affected by Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy in symptomatic patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis, using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound for evaluation of pelvic floor morphometry, NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) for evaluation of symptoms and validated questionnaires investigating intestinal, sexual and urinary functions.

These results will be compared with those obtained from symptomatic patients affected by deep infiltrating endometriosis following the standard care procedure that does not provide pelvic floor physiotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Symptomatic, nulliparous women with deep infiltrating endometriosis are included in the study.

During the first medical examination, endometriosis related symptoms are assessed using NRS (Numerical Rating Scale); intestinal, sexual and urinary functions are evaluated with validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)); pelvic floor morphometry at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during Valsalva manoeuvre is evaluated using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound through the assessment of the levator hiatus area (LHA). Gynaecological examination, transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound are performed.

After the first medical examination, enrolled patients are randomized into two groups: patients in Group A receive standard care procedure and pelvic floor physiotherapy; patients in Group B receive standard care procedure only. Pelvic floor physiotherapy protocol consists of six sessions (weeks 1, 3, 5, 8, 11 from the randomization). After four months from the first medical examination, endometriosis related symptoms, intestinal, sexual and urinary functions and pelvic floor morphometry are reassessed for all patients, using the same procedures, comparing the two groups and evaluating the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • BO
      • Bologna, BO, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproductive Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mohamed Mabrouk
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Renato Seracchioli
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Simona Del Forno
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Diego Raimondo
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alessandro Arena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with clinical and ultrasound diagnosis of deep endometriosis with related symptoms (chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, dyspareunia, dysuria)
  • Nulliparity
  • Obtaining Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an oncological disease or needing surgery for malignant pathologies
  • Urogenital prolapse
  • History of surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis
  • Congenital or acquired malformations of pelvis and pelvic floor
  • History of diseases characterised by chronic pelvic pain (interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel disease, chronic vulvodynia).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
assessment of symptoms at the first medical examination; standard care protocol; pelvic floor physiotherapy; assessment of symptoms after four months
assessment of endometriosis related symptoms using NRS (Numerical Rating Scale); intestinal, sexual and urinary functions are evaluated with validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)); pelvic floor morphometry at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during Valsalva manoeuvre is evaluated using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound through the assessment of the levator hiatus area (LHA) at the first medical examination
six individual sessions (weeks 1, 3 , 5, 8, 11 from the randomization) with pelvic floor consciousness exercises with mild contractions and relaxation (ex. 'kegel reverse' exercises); respiratory rate control exercises; extra exercises to perform at home are suggested.
the treatment is the same as usual in our center
assessment of endometriosis related symptoms using NRS (Numerical Rating Scale); intestinal, sexual and urinary functions are evaluated with validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)); pelvic floor morphometry at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during Valsalva manoeuvre is evaluated using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound through the assessment of the levator hiatus area (LHA) after four months from the randomization.
Experimental: Group B
assessment of symptoms at the first medical examination; standard care protocol; assessment of symptoms after four months
assessment of endometriosis related symptoms using NRS (Numerical Rating Scale); intestinal, sexual and urinary functions are evaluated with validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)); pelvic floor morphometry at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during Valsalva manoeuvre is evaluated using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound through the assessment of the levator hiatus area (LHA) at the first medical examination
the treatment is the same as usual in our center
assessment of endometriosis related symptoms using NRS (Numerical Rating Scale); intestinal, sexual and urinary functions are evaluated with validated questionnaires (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)); pelvic floor morphometry at rest, during pelvic floor contraction and during Valsalva manoeuvre is evaluated using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound through the assessment of the levator hiatus area (LHA) after four months from the randomization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on intestinal function
Time Frame: After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on symptomatic patients, using a validated questionnaire (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS).
After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on sexual function
Time Frame: After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on symptomatic patients, using a validated questionnaire (Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)).
After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on urinary function
Time Frame: After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on symptomatic patients, using a validated questionnaire (Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS)).
After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on pelvic floor muscles contraction
Time Frame: After four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the impact of pelvic floor physiotherapy on pelvic floor muscles contraction and pain using a gynecological examination and ultrasounds. All scans are obtained using a Voluson E6 system (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) with RAB 8-4-MHz volume transducer for all acquisitions. Measurements were evaluated using a dedicated software (4DView 14.4; GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria).
After four months from the randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of uro-genital hiatus using 3D-4D transperineal ultrasound
Time Frame: At randomization and after four months from the randomization

Women are firstly asked to rest and then contract the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) until the maximal cranioanterior displacement of the anorectal angle is attained.

The anorectal angle is defined as the angle between the posterior wall of the rectal ampulla and the anal canal.

All scans are obtained using a Voluson E6 system (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) with RAB 8-4-MHz volume transducer for all acquisitions. Measurements were evaluated using a dedicated software (4DView 14.4; GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria).

At randomization and after four months from the randomization
Evaluation of the 3D-4D transperineal ultrasound as a bio-feedback tool
Time Frame: After 1, 3, 5, 8, 11 weeks from the randomization
Patients are firstly asked to rest and then contract the pelvic floor muscles looking at the ultrasound screen in order to be aware of the contraction of the pelvic floor muscles and improve it. Voluson E6 system (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) with RAB 8-4-MHz volume transducer is used for all acquisitions.
After 1, 3, 5, 8, 11 weeks from the randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 345/2017/O/Sper

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on assessment of symptoms at the first medical examination

3
Subscribe