Evaluation of a Brief, Online Intervention for Military Personnel

February 12, 2020 updated by: Norman Schmidt, Florida State University

This randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized treatment targeting anxiety sensitivity compared to an active control: Physical Health Education Treatment (PHET) to determine efficacy among military personnel when delivered over the Internet.

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and acceptability of a computerized stress sensitivity treatment delivered online among a population of U.S. military personnel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the current proposal is to evaluate the efficacy of the Cognitive Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment (CAST) program in an online RCT through Amazon's Mechanical Turk with Veterans and military personnel. The primary outcome variables will be traumatic stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The study is being conducted at Florida State University.

Specific Aims: (1) Evaluate the efficacy of the CAST program delivered over the Internet among Veterans and military personnel; (2) Assess acceptability and usability of the CAST program delivered over the Internet without in person appointments; (3) Determine the feasibility of using Amazon's Mechanical Turk to recruit and conduct a fully online randomized controlled trial of a computerized treatment.

Veterans or active duty personnel (N = 100) who are at increased risk for mental health problems, as indicated by elevated anxiety sensitivity, will be recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Mechanical Turk is an online marketplace for individuals interested in completing computerized tasks, such as research surveys, for compensation. Participants will complete self-report symptom measures before and after the intervention as well as at a 4-month follow-up appointment. The intervention is a single session and lasts approximately 45 minutes. The intervention contains educational material to dispel commonly held false beliefs about the dangerousness of experiencing anxiety symptoms, for example elevated heart rate or a difficulty concentrating. Then participants are guided through an exercise designed to bring on these uncomfortable bodily sensations to help participants reduce the amount of distress these symptoms cause. Participants will also be asked to provide feedback related to acceptability and usability of the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32304
        • Florida State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age
  • current or past member of the U.S. military
  • elevated anxiety sensitivity as indexed by ASI-3 cognitive concerns subscale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention condition will involve participants completing baseline measures, the Cognitive Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment, post measures, and a 4 month follow up assessment.
The Cognitive Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment is a computerized treatment that is a combination of psychoeducation plus interoceptive exposure for anxiety sensitivity (AS). The psychoeducational component will focus on the nature of stress and its effect on the body. Interoceptive exposure (IE) exercises, designed to correct the conditioned fear to these bodily sensations, will be explained and practiced.
Placebo Comparator: Control
The control condition will involve participants completing baseline measures, the Physical Health Education Training, post measures, and a 4 month follow up assessment.
The Physical Health Education Training is a computerized active placebo matched in time and structure to CAST that includes information about general health and wellness (e.g. diet, exercise etc.).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Anxiety Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index - 3 (ASI-3; Taylor et al., 2007) is an 18-item self-report measure of AS. This scale was developed to provide a more stable measure of the three most widely recognized AS subfactors (cognitive, social and physical concerns) than the original ASI provides. The measure has shown good psychometric properties (Taylor et al., 2007).
Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006) is a 7- item self-report measure of generalized anxiety. Participants rate the frequency with which they experience anxiety-related symptoms on a scale of 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). The GAD-7 exhibited excellent internal consistency and good test-retest reliability (Spitzer et al., 2006). Total scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms.
Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
Change in Depressive Symptoms Module (PHQ-9).
Time Frame: Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
The Patient Health Questionnaire - Depression (PHQ-9) is the 9-item depression module of the larger Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ;Spitzer et al., 1999) which was designed to assess eight DSM-IV diagnoses, including major depressive disorder. The PHQ-9 exhibited excellent internal reliability and excellent test-retest reliability (Kroenke et al., 2001). Total scores range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
Change in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
The Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) is a brief, 20-item self-report instrument that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. We will use the PCL-5 to obtain total symptom severity scores and DSM-5 symptom cluster severity scores for each participant.
Baseline; change from baseline to immediately post intervention, change from baseline to 4 month FU
Usability of the computerized intervention
Time Frame: Immediately post intervention
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10 item self-report questionnaire assessing general usability of a given program (Brooke, 1996). The SUS total score ranges from 5 to 50 with higher scores indicating better usability.
Immediately post intervention
Client Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately post intervention
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8 item self-report questionnaire assessing general satisfaction with services of treatment received by the individual (Attkisson and Zwick, 1982). The CSQ has shown high reliability and internal consistency (Attkisson and Zwick, 1982). Total score ranges from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Immediately post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Norr02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Experimental

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Anxiety Sensitivity Treatment

3
Subscribe