Diuretic Response in Advanced Heart Failure: Bolus Intermittent vs Continuous INfusion (DRAIN)

July 9, 2018 updated by: Simone Frea, University of Turin, Italy

Diuretic Treatment in High Risk Decompensated Advanced Heart Failure. Bolus Intermittent Versus Continuous Infusion of Furosemide: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Loop diuretics are the main therapy for decongestion of patients with advanced acute heart failure. However, these patients often develop diuretic-resistance or even diuretic-refractoriness. In order to overcome such resistance to diuretic, the clinician can increase the dose of furosemide, or change the way of administration (continuous infusion versus boluses) or associate a different class of diuretics (thiazide diuretics, K+-sparing diuretics) up to the addition of low doses of inotropic agents to improve renal perfusion. At the present time there is no evidence in literature in advanced acute heart failure patients about the superiority of the treatment with furosemide in continuous infusion or in intermittent boluses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of furosemide in boluses versus continuous infusion in advanced acute heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • To
      • Torino, To, Italy, 10126
        • Simone Frea

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced heart failure
  • WET ≥ 12
  • Systolic blood pressure ≤ 110 mmHg
  • Serum sodium ≤ 135 mEq/L
  • Left systolic ventricular insufficiency (FE < 35%) note for at least 6 months
  • Class NYHA III-IV despite medical treatment maximal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Shock cardiogenic
  • Chronic renal failure stage V

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous infusion of loop diuretics
Furosemide continuous infusion: 125 or 250 mg die
intravenous administration of diuretics
Other Names:
  • furosemide
Active Comparator: Intermittent infusion of loop diuretics
Furosemide bolus intermittent: 125 or 250 mg die
intravenous administration of diuretics
Other Names:
  • furosemide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Freedom from congestion
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
72 hours after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worsening of renal function
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
Increase in creatinine value > 0.3 mg/dl or increase > 1.5 times
72 hours after randomization
Worsening or persistent HF at 72 h
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
Need to increase the dose of inotropes or diuretics
72 hours after randomization
Change in body weight
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
72 hours after randomization
Laboratory data variations in NTproBNP
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
72 hours after randomization
Treatment failure
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
Composed by the following events: persistence of congestion, need to increase diuretic treatment, need of renal replacement treatment
72 hours after randomization
Weight differences based on diuretic dose unity
Time Frame: 72 hours after randomization
72 hours after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simone Frea, MD, A.O.U. Città della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure NYHA Class III

Clinical Trials on Loop Diuretics

Subscribe