Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care (MEOPanx)

April 16, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

The emergency setting, frequently associated with pain and the feeling of loss of control, can cause anxiety in patients.

Reaction anxiety may be an appropriate response to an emergency; Nevertheless, attention must be paid to the evaluation and management of the latter especially as anxiety and pain are closely linked.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

There is a definite interest in the management of patients' pre-hospital anxiety. The literature reports a strong association between anxiety, post-traumatic stress and chronic pain. A study conducted at SAMU 31 also found that anxiety on arrival at the emergency department was a negative factor in the treatment of pain. Anxiety can reduce the pain threshold and promote hyperalgesia.

The management of patient anxiety in pre-hospital offers interesting results in terms of analgesia and satisfaction of users of care and should not be neglected.

MEOPA has recently been available in SMUR vehicles (emergency and resuscitation mobile service) at SAMU 31 (urgent medical assistance service); its availability can lead teams to change their practices. More and more emphasis is placed on the importance of positive communication and comfort for which MEOPA, with its conscious sedating effect, could be a facilitating factor.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the level of anxiety of patients treated by SMUR teams in Toulouse and receiving MEOPA following the usual indications for pain-induced pain or pain alleviation.

This is a pilot study, which focuses on the assessment of anxiety in patients treated in pre-hospital care by SMUR Toulouse and receiving MEOPA as part of their care. No data exists in the literature on this subject.

This descriptive study based on qualitative data collected by the FAS1 scale will provide us with the first data on this population. It does not change the usual management of the patient since only patients who must receive MEOPA following the usual indications for pain relief or pain-induced care will be included in the study

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • University Hospital TOULOUSE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient treated by the SMUR receiving MEOPA during pre-hospital care (in the usual indications for pain relief or pain-induced care)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 18
  • Patient supported by a SMUR team from Toulouse
  • Patient receiving MEOPA during pre-hospital care (in the usual indications for pain relief or pain-induced care)
  • Patient having given his non-opposition to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with a contraindication to MEOPA:
  • Patient requiring pure oxygen ventilation
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Any alteration of the state of consciousness preventing the patient's cooperation
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Pneumothorax
  • Emphysema bubbles
  • Gas embolism
  • Diving accident
  • Abdominal gas distension
  • Patient who received an ophthalmic gas for ocular surgery less than three months old
  • Known and unsubstituted vitamin B12 deficiency
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Refusal of the patient to participate in the study
  • Barrier of the language or alteration of the communication
  • Patient in vital distress

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The state of anxiety of the patient assessed by Face Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: 2 hours

The state of anxiety of the patient assessed by FAS (face anxiety scale) self-assessment when supported by a SMUR team with MEOPA administration.

The FAS, called the Anxiety Faces Scale, is a validated anxiety assessment scale that was originally developed in the context of Critical Care, Critical Care (ICU) management.

The Faces Anxiety Scale is a valid single-item, self-report measure of state anxiety in intensive care patients that is easy to administer and imposes minimal respondent burden. It has the potential to be a useful instrument for the assessment of state anxiety by clinicians and for research into the reduction of anxiety in this vulnerable population.

2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pain felt by the patient, evaluated by the numerical scale (EN), in connection with his anxiety
Time Frame: 2 hours
EN is a self-rated scale of pain: the patient rates his or her pain on a numeric scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The evaluation of the pain at the SAMU is carried out in routine at each support by the EN. For the purposes of this study, the investigators will find the value of the EN in the same temporality as the assessment of anxiety.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Bounes, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC31/18/0222
  • 2018-A01687-48 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Administration of MEOPA as part of the care

3
Subscribe