- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03638492
Trial of Surgical Excision Margins in Thick Primary Melanoma - 2
Long-term Follow-up of Survival in Surgical Resected Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas: Comparing 2-cm Versus 4 -cm Resection Margins - a Randomized, Multicenter Trial
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term follow-up of the overall and melanoma-specific survival in the randomised, open-lable multicenter trial (NTC NCT01183936) comparing excision margin of 2 cm versus 4 cm for patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) thicker than 2 mm.
Study hypothesis: The hypothesis is that there is no difference between the two treatment arms measured as melanoma-specific survival and overall survival.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Historically, CMMs have been excised with wide resection margins of 5-cm or more with the radical removal of lymph nodes. This treatment emerged from a recommendation from Handley in 1907 based on a single pathological specimen. This "radical" surgical management resulted in bad cosmetic results, lymphedema, long hospital inpatient stay, frequent skin grafting and/or complicated skin flap reconstructions. Not until some 60-plus years later did questions arise in clinical practices whether the need for this extensive surgery was mandated and clinical practice was not substantially changed until the late 1980's. Retrospective studies published in the 1980s suggested that narrower excision margins may be appropriate for treatment of some CMMs, especially thinner lesions.
Nowadays, the recommendations for surgical treatment are based on the Breslow thickness of the CMM, since it is considered the most important prognostic indicator of localized disease and is therefore the information upon which today's surgical strategies are founded. However, recommendations vary over the world, especially for thicker tumors which is clearly presented by Ethun et al. (2016). For CMM of ≤ 1 mm thickness most centers use a 1 cm margin, but for tumors 1.01 - 4 mm the margins of resection are 1-3 cm depending on the country. Most patients with primary CMM > 4 mm are operated on with a margin of 2-cm today. The different national guidelines are thus, somewhat confusing and in a report from 2004 Thomas JM et al. showed that a 1-cm margin for CMM with a poor prognosis (≥2 mm) is associated with a greater risk of regional recurrence than in a 3-cm margin, but with a similar survival rate.
Today, according to Sladden et al. (2018), there have been published six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing outcomes for surgical excision margins based upon Breslow thickness of invasive tumors. Three out of those six RCTs have included patients with CMMs 2-4 cm thick. Still, there are controversies and this report points out gaps of knowledge, e.g. lack of evidence about the optimal depth of excision and the optimal and minimal excision margins, since 1-cm versus 2-cm resection margins of invasive CMMs have not been directly compared yet.
Interestingly, out of one of the three RCTs analyzing melanomas with 2-4 mm thickness, long-term follow up data has recently been published by Hayes et al. 2016. They report an extended follow-up with a median follow-up of almost 9 years, concluding that 1-cm margin is not safe for high-risk CMMs compared to 3-cm margin.
From this point, based up on those interesting results, the investigators now present long-term follow-up of survival in patients included in the RCT published 2011 by Gillgren et al.
The original trial by Gillgren et al. 2011, is a randomized multicenter trial, launched from the Swedish Melanoma Study Group and the Danish Melanoma Group in 1992, included 936 patients from January 22 1992 to May 19 2004. Patients were recruited from Sweden (6 centers with 644 pat), Denmark (180 pat), Estonia (80 pat) and Norway (32 pat). Randomization routines were set up by the steering committee and eligible patients were randomized locally by telephone calls to national and international cancer centers (upon a histologically proven diagnoses and signed patient consent form). Only patients with a CMM >2 mm and with localized disease (who fulfilled the in- and exclusion criteria) were eligible for study inclusion. Patients with CMM on the hands, feet, head-neck and ano-genital region were excluded. Final surgery must had been planned within 8 weeks after date of diagnosis. All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Patients were followed clinically every 3 months for 2 years and thereafter every 6 months up to 5 years, with a median follow-up of 6.7 years. Follow-up data was thus collected from cancer registries, cause of death registries and medical records.
Statistical analyses were made by Kaplan Meier life-table curves. Prognostic factors were assessed with the use of a uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis.
In the original study, the primary melanomas were removed either by an excisional biopsy (margin of 1-3 mm) or with a 2-cm margin before randomization. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a 2-cm surgical excision margin or a 4-cm surgical excision margin. The physician enrolled the patients after histological confirmation of melanomas >2 mm. Patients who had a diagnostic initial excision were randomized to the 2-cm group or to an additional wide local excision with a margin of up to either 2 cm or 4 cm. Patients who had a 2 cm initial excision were allocated to either no further surgery and randomized to the 2-cm group. Radical surgery was to be performed within 8 weeks after the date of diagnosis. The method of surgery was to extend to, or include, the deep fascia. Pathological excision margins were not registered. The sentinel node biopsy technique was introduced in the end of the enrolment period and was allocated to the same follow-up as the other patients. There were no protocol violations since the sentinel node biopsies were all in clinical stage IIA-C preoperatively. The patients were followed by standard clinical routines within participating centers at that time every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months until 5 years. Data on clinical relapse were obtained at the follow-up visits. Outcome data were also assessed from regional cancer registries, the national cause-of-death registries, and medical records.
In the long-term follow-up study, each country collected date of death, primary cause of death and underlying cause of death from central registries. The entire cohort was followed-up until Dec 31, 2016.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Melanoma >2 mm
- Age ≤ 75 yr
- Patients operated on with ≤ 2-cm at diagnosis
- Final surgery planned within 8 weeks after date of diagnosis
- Patient fit for surgery
- Signed patient consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Melanoma on hand, foot, head-neck or ano-genital regions
- The presence of in-transit- regional and/or distant spread of the disease
- Illness making patient unfit for surgery
- Previous malignancies except basal cell- and in-situ colli uteri cancer
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 2 cm margin of excision
Patients with CMM >2 mm treated with an excision of 2-cm.
|
Patients with CMM treated with a surgical safety margin of 2-cm in the surrounding skin and down to the fascia.
|
Active Comparator: 4 cm margin of excision
Patients with CMM >2 mm treated with an excision of 4-cm.
|
Patients with CMM treated with a surgical safety margin of 4-cm in the surrounding skin and down to the fascia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Melanoma-specific survival
Time Frame: 24.9 years
|
Cause of death: cutaneous malignant melanoma
|
24.9 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall survival
Time Frame: 24.9 years
|
Cause of death: all death causes
|
24.9 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ulrik Ringborg, M.D., Ph.d., Karolinska inteitutet
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gillgren P, Drzewiecki KT, Niin M, Gullestad HP, Hellborg H, Mansson-Brahme E, Ingvar C, Ringborg U. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1635-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61546-8. Epub 2011 Oct 23. Erratum In: Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1626.
- Thomas JM, Newton-Bishop J, A'Hern R, Coombes G, Timmons M, Evans J, Cook M, Theaker J, Fallowfield M, O'Neill T, Ruka W, Bliss JM; United Kingdom Melanoma Study Group; British Association of Plastic Surgeons; Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 19;350(8):757-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030681.
- Hayes AJ, Maynard L, Coombes G, Newton-Bishop J, Timmons M, Cook M, Theaker J, Bliss JM, Thomas JM; UK Melanoma Study Group; British Association of Plastic; Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons, and the Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Wide versus narrow excision margins for high-risk, primary cutaneous melanomas: long-term follow-up of survival in a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):184-192. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00482-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
- Ethun CG, Delman KA. The importance of surgical margins in melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):339-45. doi: 10.1002/jso.24111. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
- Sladden MJ, Nieweg OE, Howle J, Coventry BJ, Thompson JF. Updated evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of melanoma: definitive excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma. Med J Aust. 2018 Feb 19;208(3):137-142. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00278.
- Utjes D, Malmstedt J, Teras J, Drzewiecki K, Gullestad HP, Ingvar C, Eriksson H, Gillgren P. 2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):471-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31132-8. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Margins Melanoma -2
- Country specific (OTHER: Swe; Nat Reg Nr, Dk; 5 dig ser nr (8XXXX), Ea; 5 dig ser nr (7XXXX), Ny; 4 dig ser nr (9XXX))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Melanoma
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteTurnstone Biologics, Corp.RecruitingMetastatic Melanoma | Conjunctival Melanoma | Ocular Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Uveal Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Iris Melanoma | Acral Melanoma | Non-Cutaneous MelanomaUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Mucosal Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Small Size | Iris Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IA Melanoma | Stage IB Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
MelanomaPRO, RussiaRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma, Stage II | Melanoma, Uveal | Melanoma in Situ | Melanoma, OcularRussian Federation
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Melanoma | Ciliary Body and Choroid Melanoma, Medium/Large Size | Iris Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Extraocular Extension Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC MelanomaUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of VirginiaCompletedStage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Stage III Skin Melanoma | Stage IIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIC Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Stage IA Skin Melanoma | Stage IB Skin Melanoma | Stage 0 Skin Melanoma | Stage I Skin Melanoma | Stage II Skin MelanomaUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkTerminatedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Metastatic Intraocular Melanoma | Recurrent Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IV Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Extraocular Extension Melanoma | Stage IIIA Intraocular Melanoma | Stage IIIB Intraocular Melanoma | Stage...United States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Melanoma | Stage IV Melanoma | Stage IIIA Melanoma | Stage IIIB Melanoma | Stage IIIC Melanoma | Stage IIB Melanoma | Stage IIC Melanoma | Stage IIA MelanomaUnited States
-
BiocadRecruitingMelanoma | Melanoma (Skin) | Melanoma Stage IV | Melanoma Stage III | Melanoma Metastatic | Melanoma Unresectable | Melanoma AdvancedIndia, Russian Federation, Belarus
-
Emory UniversityGenentech, Inc.Active, not recruitingStage IV Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIB Skin Melanoma | Stage IIIC Skin Melanoma | Unresectable Melanoma | Stage III Melanoma | Stage IIIA Skin Melanoma | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage III | Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage IVUnited States
Clinical Trials on 2-cm margin
-
Karolinska InstitutetSwedish Cancer Society; Stockholm Cancer SocietyCompletedMelanoma | Surgery | Treatment Outcome
-
Samsung Medical CenterNational Cancer Center, Korea; Asan Medical Center; Seoul National University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSurgery | Tongue Cancer | Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Resection Margin | Tongue Cancer TNM Staging Primary Tumor (T) T1 | Tongue Cancer TNM Staging Primary Tumor (T) T2Korea, Republic of
-
Mahidol UniversityCompleted
-
Kythera BiopharmaceuticalsCompletedHealthy | Submental FatUnited States, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom
-
Rakuten Medical, Inc.CompletedRecurrent Head and Neck CancerUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedAlzheimer DiseaseUnited States, Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Canada, Switzerland
-
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery HospitalUnknownHepatocellular CarcinomaChina
-
Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials LimitedNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Peter MacCallum...Active, not recruitingCutaneous Melanoma by AJCC V7 StageUnited Kingdom, United States, Sweden, Australia, Canada
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedSingle Edentulous SpaceUnited States
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted